Sounds like the pom for the project in the repository you have cloned has a
provided scope dependency on an open office JAR?
Is the CNFE in the server log or does it interfer with runtime operation of
the workbench? (I.e do you get an error pop up)
Sent on the move
On 28 May 2014 21:51,
Any solution to this item? I am having the same errors.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Compilation-errors-in-Drools-examples-tp4027650p4029754.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It looks like the class belongs to an ooxml-schemas jar. My project pom
does not specify any such dependency. However, I do see poi-ooxml-schemas
as an inherited dependency from drools-decisiontables which is currently
marked with a compile scope which should be properly including it at
runtime if
Curiosity question: Why does the @Modifies not have the @Inherited
annotation, allowing subclasses to inherit a method which may modify
something in the parent? Perhaps I have a misunderstanding of annotations
in this case but still am just wondering.
--
View this message in context:
I think some of my questions are still relevant here. For example, normally
if I need to get the latest changes from a master I would do 'git pull'.
However, the workbench doesn't seem to have any UI for that. For
repositories that are cloned from a remote repo, is the workbench
performing an
I'm wondering if this error is a red herring. In the Jboss log I am getting
the following errors on startup when it scans my project.
[Error: unable to resolve method using strict-mode:
org.drools.core.spi.KnowledgeHelper.MyClassUtils()]
[Near : {... MyClass obj = MyClassUtils.getObject(com.u
I have the same problem. It seems like the drool eclipse plugin can't
recognize third party classes (any jar files besides those within JRE
runtime and Drools runtime). Despite of the error messages, you can execute
the java application correctly.
However, I have asked around in this forum, in
Are the two following statements not equivalent?
forall($msg:Message()
Message(this==$msg, sent==true, status!=State._INITIALIZED)
)
not( Message(sent==false, status==State._INITIALIZED) )
My understanding is that they both ensure that there are no Message objects
in WM
Both should fire when there is no message.
This said, the two are not equivalent.
The negation of
Message( sent == true, status != INITIALIZED )
is:
Message( sent == false *||* status == INITIALIZED )
That is, by deMorgan's laws, you need to negate
the operators AND flip the and/or connectives.
Hi,
I didn't receive any personal email on this issue or at least I cannot find
it at the moment. Anyway sending personal emails complaining for a certain
defect or missing feature isn't of course a good idea.
I'll try to fix this issue asap.
Thanks for having reported it,
Mario
--
View
Davide,
Thank you for the clarification. My error was to interpret the not
operator as an existential function (ie: there is no such object that
exists) and viewing the object as a unit, rather than, as you pointed out,
logically manipulable.
In light of that, the logical OR in place of the comma
Hi Mario,
Thank you so much for taking care of this problem. I was pretty frustrated
by this problem and I got no answer after asking around. I thought it could
relate to another problem you solved earlier
Hi ge0ffrey
In the optoplanner example of the vehicle routing is there a way to change
the scale of the map?
as it is set to world and if locations are added within the same town or
city they are too close on the map.
also how would this example be altered to show the travel time around the
13 matches
Mail list logo
