Hi Golam,
This looks good. Would the following work as well?
-
sui.set_latex('s_{u,i}')
sui(x) = function('sui',x)
latex(sui(x))
s_{u,i}\left(x\right)
-
Or would the function assignment sui(x) =
Hi Florent,
On 31 Mrz., 22:22, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Dear Georg,
personally, I would have searched the Sage Developers Guide for
information on how sage -t works. And if there is nothing to find,
I'd look directly at the code (.../local/bin/sage-test).
Unfortunately this does not work for me:
mas...@host-56-150%pwd
/home/masgaj/sage
mas...@host-56-150%ls -l egros.py
-rw--- 1 masgaj ma 16242 2009-04-01 12:09 egros.py
mas...@host-56-150%sage -t /home/masgaj/sage/egros.py
sage -t /home/masgaj/sage/egros.py
File ./egros.py, line 18
from
Dear John,
when i had problems with doc testing outside the path, someone
(mabshoff?) pointed out that i need to do
export SAGEPATH=`pwd`
in the directory where the to-be-tested files are (in my case, it
was .pyx, not .py).
Your problem sounds related, so perhaps SAGEPATH helps.
Cheers,
thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately that makes no difference for me.
John
2009/4/1 simon.k...@uni-jena.de:
Dear John,
when i had problems with doc testing outside the path, someone
(mabshoff?) pointed out that i need to do
export SAGEPATH=`pwd`
in the directory where the
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:25:25 +0100
John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately that makes no difference
for me.
SAGE_PATH should work. I think this was also the tip on the wiki
page Florent was referring to.
Cheers,
Burcin
2009/4/1
2009/4/1 Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:25:25 +0100
John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately that makes no difference
for me.
SAGE_PATH should work. I think this was also the tip on the wiki
page Florent was
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 07:44:17 am John Cremona wrote:
I had already tried that variation. No luck!
mas...@host-56-150%echo $SAGE_PATH
/home/masgaj/sage
mas...@host-56-150%pwd
/home/masgaj/sage
mas...@host-56-150%sage -t /home/masgaj/sage/egros.py
sage -t /home/masgaj/sage/egros.py
2009/4/1 Joel B. Mohler j...@kiwistrawberry.us:
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 07:44:17 am John Cremona wrote:
I had already tried that variation. No luck!
mas...@host-56-150%echo $SAGE_PATH
/home/masgaj/sage
mas...@host-56-150%pwd
/home/masgaj/sage
mas...@host-56-150%sage -t
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:15 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/1 Joel B. Mohler j...@kiwistrawberry.us:
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 07:44:17 am John Cremona wrote:
I had already tried that variation. No luck!
mas...@host-56-150%echo $SAGE_PATH
/home/masgaj/sage
(Parenthetical note: Unfortunately, the Ubuntu webpage says: Ubuntu
From my experience I would say this is 100% due to lack of memory.
You really need
much more than 1GB RAM and 0GB swap to support 20-30 users at once.
Yup, I agree - I was just replying to the original post a little
2009/4/1 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
Yes. The sage -t foo.py thing only does from foo import * -- it
doesn't import the whole Sage library too. Maybe it should? That
would be easy to add, I think.
Perhaps not, as people might want to test python stuff without importing sage?
Sage Days 16 will take place June 22-27, 2009, and will take place at the
FME, in the campus of the UPC, in Barcelona.
More info:
http://www.uam.es/enrique.gonzalez.jimenez/sagedays16/*
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days16
*
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:20 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
(Parenthetical note: Unfortunately, the Ubuntu webpage says: Ubuntu
From my experience I would say this is 100% due to lack of memory.
You really need
much more than 1GB RAM and 0GB swap to support 20-30 users at once.
which seems harmless. The (only) reason I switched to a .py suffix
was that I could not get sage-mode to work in emacsbut that is a
different thread!
Please explain.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
April's fool joke? Nice. If all this fails, can you use Java instead :)
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:59 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
About two years ago we made the painful transition from using Darcs to
Mercurial for our revision control system. This was difficult, but had
to
Frankly, I think we have similar problems using Python at the core of
Sage. I've been thinking very hard about how to deal with this for
nearly a year now, and have come to the conclusion that we should make
a switch from using Python at the core of Sage to Lisp.
Too obvious.
Nick
A very closely related announcement is the following from Google:
http://mail.google.com/mail/help/autopilot/index.html
- kcrisman
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Well this is not a response to outline my concerns with the proposal
(which I have to say is ambitious). Instead, I'd like to add my
support to the project to convert all of Sage to LISP.
In particular, I'd be happy to work on forking MPIR and FLINT and
rewriting them in LISP (given appropriate
William Stein wrote:
2. Porting: We have an intense sequence if Lisp days, both
workshops and 1-day long IRC events, where we go line-by-line through
the Sage library and rewrite everything in Lisp. As we go, we'll
make sure that the rewritten code is always at least as fast as the
On Apr 1, 10:59 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
About two years ago we made the painful transition from using Darcs to
Mercurial for our revision control system. This was difficult, but had
to be done because it was hard to get Darcs to run everywhere, and
there were weird
Hi,
About two years ago we made the painful transition from using Darcs to
Mercurial for our revision control system. This was difficult, but had
to be done because it was hard to get Darcs to run everywhere, and
there were weird corner cases where Darcs would hang. Mercurial isn't
optimal but
I am deeply disappointed in the direction you are proposing. If you
are going to switch languages at this point, it should be to a more
modern language than Lisp. So I plan on forking the Sage project with
a Haskell rewrite. I think time will tell which is the better choice.
I am open to
For a long time, I've been complaining about the interface between
Maxima and Sage. It doesn't just make calculus slow, it slows
everything down -- every time I take a logarithm or a square root in a
numerical algorithm, Maxima slows me down. I now realize that the
right solution has just been
Whoah, hang on there. I hope you're not pushing for FLINT and MPIR in
lisp by next year!
That 4 year goal seems reasonable did NOT refer to FLINT and MPIR.
That referred to the lisp wrapper for the current C code.
Bill.
On 1 Apr, 20:10, Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
For a long
John Cremona wrote:
I still have some programs written in Algol68 if anyone is interested!
Algol60, not larger than 16k?
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:15 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/1 Joel B. Mohler j...@kiwistrawberry.us:
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 07:44:17 am John Cremona wrote:
I had already tried that variation. No luck!
mas...@host-56-150%echo $SAGE_PATH
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Marshall Hampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I am deeply disappointed in the direction you are proposing. If you
are going to switch languages at this point, it should be to a more
modern language than Lisp. So I plan on forking the Sage project with
a
On Apr 1, 2009, at 10:59 AM, William Stein wrote:
I've been thinking very hard about how to deal with this for
nearly a year now, and have come to the conclusion that we should make
a switch from using Python at the core of Sage to Lisp. The
transition won't be easy, but it will be well
2009/4/1 Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com:
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:15 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/1 Joel B. Mohler j...@kiwistrawberry.us:
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 07:44:17 am John Cremona wrote:
I had already tried that variation.
2009/4/1 Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl:
John Cremona wrote:
I still have some programs written in Algol68 if anyone is interested!
Algol60, not larger than 16k?
Certainly not, Algol 60 is so old-fashioned. With Alogol68 you can
define your own classes complete with your own in- pre- and
On Apr 1, 11:59 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
a switch from using Python at the core of Sage to Lisp. The
transition won't be easy, but it will be well worth the effort, since
in the time frame I have in mind (30 years, say) I see Lisp really
taking off,
You could have a very
Hey, I'm with you there Marshall!
I am going to create a Mathematica fork of Sage, where everything
in Sage will be rewritten in Mathematica. I'll start simple, say with
the basic commands on group theory and ring theory. Let's see, a name?
Got it. I'ill call the fork Mathematica Basic Sage or
I've spent the past few days tracking down a very nasty issue in my
recently installed sage notebook server.
It happens to me in front of the class and has happened in a seminar,
which kind of hurts my promotion of Sage here (I've just launched
offensive on several fronts, which I hope leads to
On Mar 31, 11:10 pm, Pat LeSmithe qed...@gmail.com wrote:
After some manual inspection of Sphinx's cmdline.py, I think I've made
some [crude] progress (screenshot attached). In cell.py, I replaced
Cell.set_introspect_html() with
This is cool. I've modified it a bit: I've deleted some of the
2009/4/1 John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com:
On Mar 31, 11:10 pm, Pat LeSmithe qed...@gmail.com wrote:
After some manual inspection of Sphinx's cmdline.py, I think I've made
some [crude] progress (screenshot attached). In cell.py, I replaced
Cell.set_introspect_html() with
This is
2009/4/1 Gonzalo Tornaria torna...@math.utexas.edu:
I've spent the past few days tracking down a very nasty issue in my
recently installed sage notebook server.
It happens to me in front of the class and has happened in a seminar,
which kind of hurts my promotion of Sage here (I've just
don't you mean... lisp?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:09 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/1 Gonzalo Tornaria torna...@math.utexas.edu:
I've spent the past few days tracking down a very nasty issue in my
recently installed sage notebook server.
It happens to me in front of the
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
here is a patch that adds two missing Greek
letters phi and Phi to the list common_varnames.
Could you please open a ticket for this patch? It is created
on top of sage-3.4 version.
Actually, if you want to
On Apr 1, 4:06 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/1 John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com:
Here's a link to a new picture: (how do I add links to posts?)
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/palmieri/misc/sphinx.png
John
Can you post your new code so I can try it out?
Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
here is a patch that adds two missing Greek
letters phi and Phi to the list common_varnames.
Could you please open a ticket for this patch? It is created
on top of sage-3.4
I have just received a cease-and-desist letter from the lawyers
(Dewey,CheetumHowe) hired by Mathematica. They say they
have a trademark on Mathematica BS. So that puts an end to
my plans to create a fork.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:21 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, I'm with you
Hi Stan,
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Stan Schymanski schym...@gmail.com wrote:
-
sui.set_latex('s_{u,i}')
sui(x) = function('sui',x)
latex(sui(x))
s_{u,i}\left(x\right)
-
Or would the function
About two years ago we made the painful transition from using Darcs to
Mercurial for our revision control system. This was difficult, but had
to be done because it was hard to get Darcs to run everywhere, and
there were weird corner cases where Darcs would hang. Mercurial isn't
optimal but
44 matches
Mail list logo
