Perhaps it should be disabled since *everyone* will have to remove those
files (which is annoying). I am not sure.
A2
On 1/24/13 1:25 AM, Andrew Mathas wrote:
Sorry, thanks for the pointer Anne. I've reabled the patch.
A.
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 18:58:01 UTC+11, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi Jean-Yves,
I'm very happy to see you starting to use sage and giving us constructive
feedback.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:31:37PM -0800, Jean-Yves Thibon wrote:
The problem is that, for the average user, Partitions(n), or
Compositions(n), or
Whatever(n) is expected to behave
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 20:31:36 UTC+11, Anne Schilling wrote:
Perhaps it should be disabled since *everyone* will have to remove those
files (which is annoying). I am not sure.
Following Hugh's hint, I found that
sage -sync-build
took care of the problem.
A
--
You received
On 24/01/13 19:58, Thierry Dumont wrote:
Dima,
I can make the translation into French.
==
Pour calculer les valeurs propres et les vecteurs propres d'une matrice
à coefficients flottants réels ou complexes, la matrice doit être
définie respectivement sur RDF (Real Double
Le 24/01/2013 09:35, Francois Bissey a écrit :
On 24/01/13 19:58, Thierry Dumont wrote:
Dima,
I can make the translation into French.
==
Pour calculer les valeurs propres et les vecteurs propres d'une matrice
à coefficients flottants réels ou complexes, la matrice doit être
Hi Travis,
On 2013-01-24, Travis Scrimshaw tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Isn't that a total mess? Is there a reason why UniqueRepresentation
provides __eq__ and __hash__, but not __cmp__?
I thought __cmp__() is only called if __eq__() is not implemented?
I did not check the documentation
This question is related to the following page
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/GraphTheoryRoadmap
Oh yeah. This is the page that sometimes pops up when I google something :-D
As one can see the last time it was modified was 3 years ago. Now in the
meantime many new things
Le 24/01/2013 10:04, Julien Puydt a écrit :
Le 24/01/2013 09:35, Francois Bissey a écrit :
On 24/01/13 19:58, Thierry Dumont wrote:
Dima,
I can make the translation into French.
==
Pour calculer les valeurs propres et les vecteurs propres d'une matrice
à coefficients flottants
I noticed that trac bug before, the patch pretty-printing messes up the
encoding.
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:20:40 AM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I've already added a Russian translation. By the way, does anyone know
why
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:20:40 AM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
For computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors of matrices over floating
point real or complex numbers, the matrix should be defined over ``RDF``
(Real Double Field) or ``CDF`` (Complex Double Field), respectively. If
no ring
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 10:19:33 UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote:
This question is related to the following page
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/GraphTheoryRoadmap
Oh yeah. This is the page that sometimes pops up when I google something
:-D
Yes! Someone even posted this as an
Hi folks,
I was told about NIFTY, a Python package for numerical information
field theory. Don't know if anyone is interested in checking it out.
--
Regards,
Minh Van Nguyen
http://bit.ly/mvngu
-- Forwarded message --
From: Torsten Ensslin enss...@mpa-garching.mpg.de
Date:
Hello everybody,
What do you think of the idea of adding two new roles (such as the ones
existing for trac and wikipedia) :
:arxiv:`hep-ph/0206021`
and
:doi:`10.1007/BF02546665`
The idea is to try to have more links in the references, towards the outer
web, so that one can click to the
On 24 January 2013 12:15, Frédéric Chapoton fchapot...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
What do you think of the idea of adding two new roles (such as the ones
existing for trac and wikipedia) :
:arxiv:`hep-ph/0206021`
and
:doi:`10.1007/BF02546665`
The idea is to try to have more
Hellooo !!
I am now wondering how fast are we in comparison with other packages.
Yep, me too :-)
I agree with this philosophy of not comparing progress with others. My
motivation stems mostly from the fact that I'd like to have a list of
missing features so that sometimes when I
oops, I didn't check that the French version of this tutorial part ends
somehow abruptly some 20 lines above the place for this paragraph, so I
can't use this translation :-(
Perhaps someone should open a ticket to fix this?
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 17:36:44 UTC+8, tdumont wrote:
Le
+2
Yes, definitely a good idea.
Another possiblity would be :msn: for matscinet links, but this has the
downside of not being accessible to everybody.
Andrew
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 23:15:26 UTC+11, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
Hello everybody,
What do you think of the idea of adding
Le 24/01/2013 13:15, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
Hello everybody,
What do you think of the idea of adding two new roles (such as the ones
existing for trac and wikipedia) :
:arxiv:`hep-ph/0206021`
and
:doi:`10.1007/BF02546665`
The idea is to try to have more links in the references, towards
While testing for speed regressions due to #12313, I actually
encountered a serious slowdown from sage-5.5 to sage-5.6:
def test():
for count in range(12):
for n in [2..20]:
for g in Gamma0(n).gamma_h_subgroups():
G = g.image_mod_n()
assert
I think the name should be as short as reasonably possible. The end user
will only see a hyperlink so there isn't really any benefit from
namespacing the trac roles.
Though MathSciNet is already an abbreviation, I don't think we need to
shorten it further. Certainly not something that could
Computing a determinant of a random matrix over a big finite field
became slower *by a factor 10* in sage-5.6.beta3:
def test(k):
for count in range(20):
d = random_matrix(k,50).det()
k = GF(next_prime(10^20))
time test(k)
sage-5.6.beta2: 2.6s
sage-5.6.beta3: 27.0s
--
You
+1
Another possiblity would be :msn: for matscinet links, but this has the
downside of not being accessible to everybody.
I thought Make Link gives a link which is always accessible contrary to
the searching page.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
This was introduced in sage-5.6.beta1.
On 2013-01-24 15:36, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
While testing for speed regressions due to #12313, I actually
encountered a serious slowdown from sage-5.5 to sage-5.6:
def test():
for count in range(12):
for n in [2..20]:
for g in
See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14007
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On 1/24/13 6:25 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
But there mustbe other functions somewhere : I haven't seen the methods
they use to remove/add vertices and edges.
I like the elegance in Mathematica for highlighting vertices and edges
when drawing a graph:
Hi,
we are looking for someone who is can maybe review patch #13765 on
embeddings between cyclotomic fields, since our patch #8327 depends on
it. We would like to work on top of that during the Sage Days:
Multiple Dirichlet Series, Combinatorics, and Representation Theory at
ICERM in 2 weeks, so
Hey Simon,
Isn't that a total mess? Is there a reason why UniqueRepresentation
provides __eq__ and __hash__, but not __cmp__?
I thought __cmp__() is only called if __eq__() is not implemented?
I did not check the documentation before writing the following, but I
think it is as
On Jan 24, 11:29 am, Travis Scrimshaw tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote:
And now the catch: In a Cython class, you can not directly implement
__eq__, but you *must* implement __richcmp__ instead.
That seems strange to me...
That's just how Cpython chose to implement those routines. Instead of
Hi Nils,
On 2013-01-24, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
And that's a
problem when cythoning UniqueRepresentation, because currently it is a
Python class with __eq__, __ne__ and __hash__ implemented, but not with
__richcmp__.
That is NOT a problem! If you don't want to implement __le__,
On 2013-01-24, Sébastien Labbé sla...@gmail.com wrote:
--=_Part_123_6277205.1359040957811
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
+1
Another possiblity would be :msn: for matscinet links, but this has the
downside of not being accessible to everybody.
I thought Make Link gives a
30 matches
Mail list logo
