Hi!
Currently, I try to resume writing code for modules over finite
dimensional path algebra quotients. At #12630, Jim Stark proposes some
code that apparently has a non-empty intersection with what I need, but
much of it is orthogonal.
So, I'm seeking advice how to fit my experimental code with
Dear Simon,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:38:38AM +, Simon King wrote:
Currently, I try to resume writing code for modules over finite
dimensional path algebra quotients. At #12630, Jim Stark proposes some
code that apparently has a non-empty intersection with what I need, but
much
Hi Nicolas,
On 2013-04-29, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
First question: Would you agree that a quiver should be identified with
the algebraic structure formed by paths with concatenation? Or should
quiver as a digraph be kept separate from quiver as an algebraic
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:38:38AM +, Simon King wrote:
Second question: How do we call this structure? It is not a monoid, unless
there is a single vertex (it has idempotents corresponding to its vertices),
If it has more than one vertex, then it contains a zero element that one
obtains
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:35:43PM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I think the problem was mainly unclarity with the definition of
module. I thought you wanted to split up the sources into
different repos, like we have now. And that's the only thing I am
against.
hi Jeroen.
that's great. in
On 04/29/2013 09:18 AM, Felix Salfelder wrote:
theres not even a need for a
monolithic build system within git/src?
No, there is no need for a monolithic build system. In fact, I prefer a
separate build system for each module. Of course, there should be a
top-level Makefile which runs the
Hi sage-devel!
I would like to invite you to the new SWMATH service.
http://www.swmath.org/
It's an information service regarding math. software
and it's main emphasis lies in collecting
citations of mathematical software.
So, it's a service where you might benefit when writing research
In sage-5.9.rc1, this now gives:
$ ./sage -t --optional --long foo.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /mazur/release/merger/sage-5.9.rc1/local/bin/sage-runtests,
line 86, in module
DC = DocTestController(options, args)
File
here is the ticket adding CSDP as an experimental package:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14505
On Thursday, 11 April 2013 11:52:30 UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Dear all,
we'd like to add CSDP, (a fast semidefinite programming solver, one of the
very best around),
as an
here is the ticket adding CSDP as an experimental package:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14505
Wow. Cool !
Why do you prefer to create 2 tickets for that ? It feels a bit weird to
review an interface between Sage and a spkg which is not included, and it
feels weird to add to Sage a
On Monday, 29 April 2013 21:09:44 UTC+8, Nathann Cohen wrote:
here is the ticket adding CSDP as an experimental package:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14505
Wow. Cool !
Why do you prefer to create 2 tickets for that ? It feels a bit weird to
review an interface between
e.g. Flagmatic only needs csdp executable installed.
So, in a way, it already makes sense without anything extra.
Oh. I see !
Haveyou already created a ticket for the interface ?
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To
On Monday, 29 April 2013 22:26:37 UTC+8, Nathann Cohen wrote:
e.g. Flagmatic only needs csdp executable installed.
So, in a way, it already makes sense without anything extra.
Oh. I see !
Haveyou already created a ticket for the interface ?
not yet, it's in the works still.
not yet, it's in the works still.
Ok, cool ! Send me a line when you will begin to work on that. And to
Jernej too, whom I added to this email. He may be part of GSOC this
summer, and may want to work on that too.
Could you send an email to sage-devel to ask them how the hell we are
supposed to
On 2013-04-29, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
not yet, it's in the works still.
Ok, cool ! Send me a line when you will begin to work on that. And to
Jernej too, whom I added to this email. He may be part of GSOC this
summer, and may want to work on that too.
Could you send an
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
not yet, it's in the works still.
Ok, cool ! Send me a line when you will begin to work on that. And to
Jernej too, whom I added to this email. He may be part of GSOC this
summer, and may want to work on that too.
The code is here:
The code is here:
https://github.com/mghasemi/pycsdp
(written by our new postdoc)
it still lacks docstrings, etc etc.
O_o
But how do you get this into Sage ? I don't get how you work...
Probably further on the GIT road than I can understand right now :-P
Nathann
--
You received this
On 2013-04-29, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
The code is here:
https://github.com/mghasemi/pycsdp
(written by our new postdoc)
it still lacks docstrings, etc etc.
O_o
But how do you get this into Sage ? I don't get how you work...
I'm telling him for a month already to get
Hi Sage-Devel/Sage-Notebook,
I've created a mailing list
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/sage-cloud
for discussion of a website called https://cloud.sagemath.com, whose
mission statement is: Create a viable way to do computational
mathematics in the cloud using Sage.
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:52:30 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Dear all,
we'd like to add CSDP, (a fast semidefinite programming solver, one of the
very best around),
as an optional package.
https://projects.coin-or.org/Csdp/
I assume this works on Linux as well - there were
Le 29/04/2013 19:23, kcrisman a écrit :
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:52:30 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Dear all,
we'd like to add CSDP, (a fast semidefinite programming solver, one
of the very best around),
as an optional package.
https://projects.coin-or.org/Csdp/
On 2013-04-29, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
--=_Part_5928_32884296.1367256180205
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:52:30 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Dear all,
we'd like to add CSDP, (a fast semidefinite programming solver, one of
On 2013-04-29, Thierry Dumont tdum...@math.univ-lyon1.fr wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--060206000403010900080606
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Le 29/04/2013 19:23, kcrisman a =E9crit
23 matches
Mail list logo
