Hello,
the patchbot seems to be broken again. The round icons says something like
unavailable for maintenance
Frederic
Le mercredi 22 octobre 2014 09:05:38 UTC+2, Robert Bradshaw a écrit :
The patchbot didn't survive the migration to the new machine. Fixed.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:22
On 18 November 2014 21:22, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org
wrote:
On 18 November 2014 17:40, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
In my notation, the Wirtinger derivative is d f(z) / d z and d f(z) /
d
On 2014-11-19 9:36 AM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org wrote:
...
Then I noticed that if we have f=z we get
conjugate(z).diff(z)
which is 0. So the 2nd term is 0 and the result is just the first
Wirtinger derivative.
Perhaps I am misinterpreting something?
Oops, my fault.
I really like the idea of moving threads to sage-flame when they start to
go out of hand. What was the criterion to do so until now?
Also, from an ownership point of view, the right to move discussions
between google groups belongs to google, and google's rules state that they
would do so when
OK, this looks better!
(1) - D(abs(x),x)
_
x + x
(1) ---
2abs(x)
Type:
Expression(Integer)
(2) - D(conjugate(x),y)
(2) 0
Type:
Expression(Integer)
(3) -
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:30 PM, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
Also, from an ownership point of view, the right to move discussions between
google groups belongs to google, and google's rules state that they would do
so when the person that opened the group decides (correct me if i am wrong).
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org wrote:
On 2014-11-19 9:36 AM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org wrote:
...
Then I noticed that if we have f=z we get
conjugate(z).diff(z)
which is 0. So the 2nd term is 0 and the result is just the first
Wirtinger
On Nov 19, 2014 8:30 AM, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
I really like the idea of moving threads to sage-flame when they start to
go out of hand. What was the criterion to do so until now?
Also, from an ownership point of view, the right to move discussions
between google groups belongs to
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org wrote:
OK, this looks better!
(1) - D(abs(x),x)
_
x + x
(1) ---
2abs(x)
Type:
Expression(Integer)
(2) - D(conjugate(x),y)
(2)
I had always assumed that sage-flame was a fictional entity! Please
don't post a link here, I do not want to be tempted to read it
John
On 19 November 2014 16:30, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
I really like the idea of moving threads to sage-flame when they start to go
out of hand. What
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org wrote:
OK, this looks better!
(1) - D(abs(x),x)
_
x + x
(1) ---
2abs(x)
Just a random thought after coming back from a very nice evening out:
A bunch of 10~20 guys who can talk together for days about having or
not a code of conduct, each expressing his own voice and mixing it
with the others'... really have no communication problem :-P
Good night to all ! One
Since this mostly concerns FriCAS I am cross posting to that group. I will
also post the patch there. For FriCAS list reference the original email
thread is here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/6j-LcC6tpkE
Here is the result of compiling the patch against the current
A bunch of 10~20 guys who can talk together for days about having or
not a code of conduct, each expressing his own voice and mixing it
with the others'... really have no communication problem :-P
Am I misreading this or does this belong on sage-sexist-comments ?
-Mike
--
You received
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Mike Zabrocki mike.zabro...@gmail.com wrote:
A bunch of 10~20 guys who can talk together for days about having or
not a code of conduct, each expressing his own voice and mixing it
with the others'... really have no communication problem :-P
Am I misreading
2014-11-19 20:56 GMT+01:00 Mike Zabrocki mike.zabro...@gmail.com:
A bunch of 10~20 guys who can talk together for days about having or
not a code of conduct, each expressing his own voice and mixing it
with the others'... really have no communication problem :-P
Am I misreading this or does
with the others'... really have no communication problem :-P
In that case, may I request a moment of silence to be held in honor of the
irony of this comment?
-Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group
Hi,
After obtaining the source code from the git repository, I tried to build
Sage but it failed. This is the error I see:
checking complex.h usability... no
checking complex.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: complex.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: complex.h: check
Hi everyone,
I have been following this for a while even if I didn't post. I am actually
in favor of a code of conduct even so I understand its limitations.
Anyway, what I think we really need is something to do when you feel
insulted or offended in a thread. Something to take into account is
This test if your c++ complier is recent enough and complete enough. You may
have to install some extra development packages for your compiler.
I would actually be curious to see your config.log.
Francois
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:07:18 Nicolás Sirolli wrote:
Hi,
After obtaining the source
In my mind, moving a conversation to sage-flame is a constructive,
if imperfect way to handle conversations that are going off the deep
end. It's a way that we can flag a conversation as being
inappropriate for the tone of sage-devel without pointing fingers. If
somebody doesn't want to
This morning I wanted to install sage on another machine so I went to the sage
installation guide http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/index.html to
remind myself where to clone the git repository from. As far as I can see,
there's no mention of git anywhere in this guide. In particular,
Since this mostly concerns FriCAS I am cross posting to that group. I
will also post the patch there. For FriCAS list reference the original
email thread is here:
But if you come up with a solution Sage (or Ginac, or whatever) can
implement too, please let us know!
--
You received
In my mind, moving a conversation to sage-flame is a constructive,
if imperfect way to handle conversations that are going off the deep
end. It's a way that we can flag a conversation as being
inappropriate for the tone of sage-devel without pointing fingers. If
somebody doesn't want
On 19 November 2014 21:23, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Since this mostly concerns FriCAS I am cross posting to that group. I will
also post the patch there. For FriCAS list reference the original email
thread is here:
But if you come up with a solution Sage (or Ginac, or
This morning I wanted to install sage on another machine so I went to the
sage
installation guide http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/index.html
to remind myself where to clone the git repository from. As far as I can
see, there's no mention of git anywhere in this guide. In
Hello !
Am I misreading this or does this belong on sage-sexist-comments ?
I wondered the same, but I would definitely given Nathann the benefit
of the doubt, because:
Thank you for the benefit of the doubt. I can use some of that !
The truth is that I have no idea how to say gender-neutral
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org wrote:
On 19 November 2014 21:23, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Since this mostly concerns FriCAS I am cross posting to that group. I will
also post the patch there. For FriCAS list reference the original email
Hi,
Le 17/11/2014 12:17, Volker Braun a écrit :
Our gcc 4.9.2 doesn't compile on arm, and nobody
reviewed http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17348 so far.
Somebody did before I found the time to read about it...
Snark on #sagemath
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
29 matches
Mail list logo
