On the other hand, things that *are* plots should be plotted (duh) and if
you ask to show them, since the default behavior has been to plot and not
LaTeX, that should probably continue.
Not exactly related, but here is the behaviour in beta3 (see [1] and [2]):
sage: show(posets.ChainPoset(5))
The Developer's guide
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/packaging.html#directory-structure
states the ported packages' tarballs have to be in *lower case* :
The build scripts and associated files are in a subdirectory
SAGE_ROOT/build/pkgs/package, where you replace package with a
Hi Nathann,
There is a tiny bit of documentation in sage.structure.sage_object. Look
in particular at register_unpickle_override that allows you to redefine
how old pickles have to be pickled. There are tons of examples in the
Sage library. Just grep register_unpickle_override.
On the other
On 30 April 2015 at 01:51, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
I don't think I've seen it reported before: running make ptestlong on
Sage-6.6 after distclean crashed my server last night.
Similar has been reported to sage-release about two weeks ago:
Hi,
I've recently faced this surprising appearance of a logarithm (in Sage
6.7.beta3 as well as in any older versions I've tried, down to Sage 6.3):
sage: var('y')
y
sage: f = function('H', x, y); f
H(x, y)
sage: loads(dumps(f))
-x*log(-x*y + 1)
If we use a lower case symbol, it is fine:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 10:09:55 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 April 2015 23:17:19 UTC+1, Bill Page wrote:
On Apr 29, 2015 7:30 AM, Dima Pasechnik dim...@gmail.com wrote:
this patch should go into Sage proper, as it also fixes the same as
with SMC
issue
On Wednesday, 29 April 2015 23:17:19 UTC+1, Bill Page wrote:
On Apr 29, 2015 7:30 AM, Dima Pasechnik dim...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
this patch should go into Sage proper, as it also fixes the same as
with SMC
issue with Sage's notebook.
Sure. What is the best
Hellooo everybody,
I come to you because I plan to (seriously) rewrite the internal
strucure of graph classes. While this makes no difference on the
outside, I am meeting problems with pickles:
Indeed, there are two classes in sage.graphs.base.backends which are
named (since 2010):
-
On Tuesday, 17 February 2015 14:55:35 UTC, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am trying to compute a couple of things on polyhedra, and for that I
need to generate and test a lot of them, each at a time. While I never
store them in any way my code stops after a while because of
On 2015-04-30 08:57, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
The Developer's guide
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/packaging.html#directory-structure
states the ported packages' tarballs have to be in *lower case* :
The build scripts and associated files are in a subdirectory
On 30/04/2015, at 21:43, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2015-04-30 08:57, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
The Developer's guide
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/packaging.html#directory-structure
states the ported packages' tarballs have to be in *lower case* :
The build
I get an internal server error when I try to login with the password.
Were there recent changes to the corresponding server?
Dima
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 2:43:43 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2015-04-30 08:57, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
The Developer's guide
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/packaging.html#directory-structure
states the ported packages' tarballs have to be in *lower case* :
I just tested the patch and now I get the following in a Sage worksheet on SMC:
axiom.eval()version)
'alue = Axiom Axiom (May 2012) built on Friday July 25, 2014 at 23:34:17 \r\n'
%sage
from axiom import axiom
axiom.eval()version)
'Value = Axiom Axiom (May 2012) built on Friday July 25, 2014
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 18:12:00 UTC+1, Bill Page wrote:
I just tested the patch and now I get the following in a Sage worksheet on
SMC:
axiom.eval()version)
'alue = Axiom Axiom (May 2012) built on Friday July 25, 2014 at 23:34:17
\r\n'
%sage
from axiom import axiom
John H Palmieri wrote:
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 2:43:43 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2015-04-30 08:57, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
The Developer's guide
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/packaging.html#directory-structure
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 17:11:39 UTC+1, Bill Page wrote:
On 30 April 2015 at 05:29, Dima Pasechnik dim...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 10:09:55 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 April 2015 23:17:19 UTC+1, Bill Page wrote:
PPS. if you
On 30 April 2015 at 13:34, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 17:11:39 UTC+1, Bill Page wrote:
...
well, for rants we have a special newsgroup called sage-flame.
Yes, although I consider what I wrote more of an inconvenient
statement of fact so maybe I used the
On 30 April 2015 at 13:29, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 18:12:00 UTC+1, Bill Page wrote:
I just tested the patch and now I get the following in a Sage worksheet on
SMC:
axiom.eval()version)
'alue = Axiom Axiom (May 2012) built on Friday July 25, 2014
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org wrote:
On 30 April 2015 at 13:34, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 17:11:39 UTC+1, Bill Page wrote:
...
well, for rants we have a special newsgroup called sage-flame.
Yes, although I
It seems that a consensus on those issues should be reached *before*
patching anything : the different behaviors of different platforms (Macs
nvs other Unices, and do not forget Windows, which is still a target...)
make some assumptions hardly enforceable (or even checkable). The scripts
On 30 April 2015 at 21:45, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Page wrote:
It just occurred to me that for such
simple things there should be simple solutions. And I guess there is:
Well, that has been discussed a lot. There *is* one possibility now - you
can open a pull request at
Yes, I guess we do so at our own risk. :) My intention was not to
flame but rather just expressing my reaction after reading
http://sagemath.org/doc/developer/git_trac.html#chapter-git-trac
and considering the possible fate of my 3 line patch if I don't find
the time to do things this
Hello everybody,
I have a simple problem. I need to implement a __reduce__ function for pickling,
and such a function must apparently return a pair:
(f, args)
You can then build the original object with f(*args).
I would like to do the same, but with additional keywords arguments,
i.e.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org wrote:
I won't claim that Sage's
doctests make Sage have fewer errors or problems than the other
systems you use (they surely have their own approaches to testing).
However, I absolutely claim -- and I'm sure anybody with
On 30 April 2015 at 16:06, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org
wrote:
...
You stated 'that the Sage developer emphasis on doc tests has
resulted in any fewer errors or problems in Sage in comparison to
other systems.'
Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2015-04-30 08:57, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
The Developer's guide
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/packaging.html#directory-structure
states the ported packages' tarballs have to be in *lower case* :
The build scripts and associated files are in a subdirectory
On 30 April 2015 at 05:29, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I thought that on SMC in a Sage worksheet you can do %axiom
and this will call a system-wide Axiom. Currently SMC is hanging for me,
so I can't check.
OK, one can start axiom in an SMC terminal, by typing axiom
it is
I'm having different trouble: I used to authenticate with Google open ID,
which doesn't work anymore. I tried recover via email. It does recognize
my email addres and reports Account recovery email sent. No mail seems to
arrive, though.
--
You received this message because you are
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
I'm having different trouble: I used to authenticate with Google open ID,
which doesn't work anymore. I tried recover via email. It does recognize
my email addres and reports Account recovery email sent. No mail seems to
arrive,
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 2:30:48 AM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
Hi,
I've recently faced this surprising appearance of a logarithm (in Sage
6.7.beta3 as well as in any older versions I've tried, down to Sage 6.3):
sage: var('y')
y
sage: f = function('H', x, y); f
H(x, y)
sage:
Am Donnerstag, 30. April 2015 05:56:11 UTC+2 schrieb Volker Braun:
On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 11:37:38 PM UTC-4, Martin R wrote:
Oh, now that's an explanation! So the explanation in the third post on
this thread,
displayhook: calls __repr__ on the value of the last statement and
On 30 April 2015 at 05:29, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 10:09:55 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 April 2015 23:17:19 UTC+1, Bill Page wrote:
PPS. if you really are pressed for time, I can submit this patch
instead...
Thanks I would
33 matches
Mail list logo
