Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Christopher Swenson ch...@caswenson.com wrote: I like the idea of having an official Docker image. I think also creating a standard, say, VirtualBox image with the latest Sage on a reasonable Linux OS (like the latest LTS ubuntu), and releasing that as well

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Christopher Swenson
Perfect. :) On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:01 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Christopher Swenson ch...@caswenson.com wrote: I like the idea of having an official Docker image. I think also creating a standard, say, VirtualBox image with the latest

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Anne Schilling
I posted something on the SMC wiki (with a link to it in the FAQ). It is the result of a few iterations of the process. https://github.com/sagemathinc/smc/wiki/SageMath-Development-on-SageMathCloud I just followed the steps there and everything worked great! Thanks to everyone who

[sage-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Anne Schilling
I posted something on the SMC wiki (with a link to it in the FAQ). It is the result of a few iterations of the process. https://github.com/sagemathinc/smc/wiki/SageMath-Development-on-SageMathCloud I just followed the steps there and everything worked great! Thanks to everyone who

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Christopher Swenson
I like the idea of having an official Docker image. I think also creating a standard, say, VirtualBox image with the latest Sage on a reasonable Linux OS (like the latest LTS ubuntu), and releasing that as well could be cool. --Christopher On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:35 PM, William Stein

[sage-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC (was: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report)

2015-06-13 Thread Franco Saliola
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 6:15:44 AM UTC-5, Darij Grinberg wrote: Hi Anne, On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Anne Schilling an...@math.ucdavis.edu javascript: wrote: The SageMathCloud was great for those who had trouble installing Sage on their own computer. Sometimes we had

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Franco Saliola
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Franco Saliola sali...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 6:27:28 PM UTC-5, William Stein wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Franco Saliola sali...@gmail.com wrote: Here is a mini report on Sage Day 65. I'm not an organizer so this is

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Franco Saliola
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Franco Saliola sali...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 6:27:28 PM UTC-5, William Stein wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Franco Saliola sali...@gmail.com wrote: Here is a mini report on Sage Day 65. I'm not an organizer so this is

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Franco Saliola
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 5:03:02 AM UTC+2, Franco Saliola wrote: Most of these problems were related to installing on Macs: various different OS versions (10.10, 10.9, 10.8, ...); XCode versions Apple does not

[sage-devel] Re: SageManifolds Install Issue

2015-06-13 Thread Jan Groenewald
Another side effect in 6.7 PPA is any foo? or foo?? in the sage command line says ImportError: no module named conf, but it seems help(foo) still works. In the notebook foo? and foo?? still works. Not sure whether this is PPA or 6.7 specific. Another option is to have another PPA with a deb with

[sage-devel] Functions returning sub-structure

2015-06-13 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
I am making functions to compute, for example, maximal sublattices or Frattini sublattice of a lattice. It is somewhat faster to return only list of elements instead of lattice. What you think, should the function return 1) a sublattice, ready to use as a lattice for further computations; user

Re: [sage-devel] Re: revisions to sandpiles needs review

2015-06-13 Thread Nathann Cohen
What if they would be willing to systematically review my revisions according to the usual conventions (e.g., http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/reviewer_checklist.html#chapter-review)? Does this seem like a reasonable way to proceed? Yes, there is nothing wrong with that. Anybody can

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Volker Braun
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 5:03:02 AM UTC+2, Franco Saliola wrote: Most of these problems were related to installing on Macs: various different OS versions (10.10, 10.9, 10.8, ...); XCode versions Apple does not support OSX 10.10, so I don't see how we could (or should). (3) A computer

Re: [sage-devel] Functions returning sub-structure

2015-06-13 Thread Johan S . R . Nielsen
Jori Mäntysalo writes: At least for now we don't have parameter like trust_me_i_know_what_i_am_doing=True for posets or lattices. Such a parameter would make lots of sense, I think. This can be seen for example with C500=Posets.ChainPoset(500), and after that even C500.join(100,200)

Re: [sage-devel] The future of polybori

2015-06-13 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
Your plan does look good to me Martin. Just note it wont be trivial. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-devel group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To

Re: [sage-devel] Functions returning sub-structure

2015-06-13 Thread Johan S . R . Nielsen
Jori Mäntysalo writes: At least for now we don't have parameter like trust_me_i_know_what_i_am_doing=True for posets or lattices. Such a parameter would make lots of sense, I think. I have thinked about it. It needs some more thinking - how much should be trusted? But at least for

[sage-devel] Re: Documentation: Adding function from A to list of functions in B

2015-06-13 Thread Simon King
Hi! On 2015-06-08, Viviane Pons vivianep...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-06-08 9:51 GMT-05:00 Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com: To me it is not a problem of doc but a problem of code. The issue is that we have 99% of the poset functions in the poset/ folder, and a couple of them in the

Re: [sage-devel] Functions returning sub-structure

2015-06-13 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
I would make the function which returns a list a private function and then the public function calls the private one and converts it into a poset/lattice as overall, I don't like arguments which change the output type (and who really wants to deal with passing them along too?). However,

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Darij, Step 3: maybe explain how to tell when the copying is complete? I think it took more than 3min for me (I used du -s to check on it). Step 4: IOError: [Errno 122] Disk quota exceeded What should I do? Perhaps you skipped Step 1?? 1. Open the SMC project that you intend to use

[sage-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Darij, Step 3: maybe explain how to tell when the copying is complete? I think it took more than 3min for me (I used du -s to check on it). Step 4: IOError: [Errno 122] Disk quota exceeded What should I do? Perhaps you skipped Step 1?? 1. Open the SMC project that you intend to use

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
In regards to Franco's suggestion, I like it, but I think it should not send it to sage-devel. Best, Travis non-CI On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 8:29:14 AM UTC-7, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: sage-devel or sage-support (or sage-install or sage-apple or sage-osx :) -- You received this message

Re: [sage-devel] Functions returning sub-structure

2015-06-13 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: At least for now we don't have parameter like trust_me_i_know_what_i_am_doing=True for posets or lattices. Such a parameter would make lots of sense, I think. I have thinked about it. It needs some more thinking - how much should be trusted?

[sage-devel] Re: Documentation and functions in wrong place

2015-06-13 Thread Simon King
Hi Nathann, On 2015-06-09, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: I would have much less objections if we decided that the category of X should be implemented in the main file that implements X (and not centralize everything in the subfolders of category/). This way, the poset category

[sage-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC (was: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report)

2015-06-13 Thread Darij Grinberg
Hi Franco, thank you! I'm trying to follow the instructions now. Step 3: maybe explain how to tell when the copying is complete? I think it took more than 3min for me (I used du -s to check on it). Step 4: IOError: [Errno 122] Disk quota exceeded What should I do? Best regards, Darij On

Re: Copying installations on SMC (was: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report)

2015-06-13 Thread Darij Grinberg
Hi Franco, thank you! I'm trying to follow the instructions now. Step 3: maybe explain how to tell when the copying is complete? I think it took more than 3min for me (I used du -s to check on it). Step 4: IOError: [Errno 122] Disk quota exceeded What should I do? Best regards, Darij On

[sage-devel] difference between optional and default in documention

2015-06-13 Thread David Perkinson
When should one use optional versus default in docstrings? I've noticed a lot of variation in the files in /src/sage/. Often, optional is used if the argument in question defaults to None, but I also see (default: None) or (default: ``None``). On the other hand, I also see examples of

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Darij Grinberg
Hi Anne, ah, this got updated while I wasn't looking :) Thanks for the reminder! Best regards, Darij On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Anne Schilling a...@math.ucdavis.edu wrote: Hi Darij, Step 3: maybe explain how to tell when the copying is complete? I think it took more than 3min for

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Darij Grinberg
Hi Anne, ah, this got updated while I wasn't looking :) Thanks for the reminder! Best regards, Darij On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Anne Schilling a...@math.ucdavis.edu wrote: Hi Darij, Step 3: maybe explain how to tell when the copying is complete? I think it took more than 3min for

[sage-devel] Re: Documentation: Adding function from A to list of functions in B

2015-06-13 Thread Simon King
Hi Nathann, On 2015-06-08, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: I disagree with that. There's some advantage: if your code only depends on general mathematical properties of posets and not on the specific implementation of the poset object, then it should be in the category.

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Darij Grinberg darijgrinb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Anne, ah, this got updated while I wasn't looking :) Thanks for the reminder! It got updated because you were looking :-) Best regards, Darij On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Anne Schilling

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Darij Grinberg darijgrinb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Anne, ah, this got updated while I wasn't looking :) Thanks for the reminder! It got updated because you were looking :-) Best regards, Darij On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Anne Schilling

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
sage-devel or sage-support (or sage-install or sage-apple or sage-osx :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-devel group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To

[sage-devel] Re: difference between optional and default in documention

2015-06-13 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey David, My general rule is that default is something that is a necessary part of the method's input data and optional is, well, optional. For example, suppose I have a q-deformation of a statistic on permutations, so why write another method? Instead let's add a parameter q that defaults

[sage-devel] Re: Question about Free algebra

2015-06-13 Thread Simon King
Hi John, On 2015-06-09, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote: sage: list(X) [((1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0,= =20 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0), 1)] It looks like the tuple is a concatenation of 6 (one for each factor of X)= =20

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Darij Grinberg
Hi, thanks to both of you for your help on step 3, but I've got another problem on step 4 now: ~/sage-dev-images/sage-6.8.beta3$ git trac config --user darij --pass [redacted] Saved trac username. Saved trac password. Trac xmlrpc URL: http://trac.sagemath.org/xmlrpc (anonymous)

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Darij Grinberg
Hi, thanks to both of you for your help on step 3, but I've got another problem on step 4 now: ~/sage-dev-images/sage-6.8.beta3$ git trac config --user darij --pass [redacted] Saved trac username. Saved trac password. Trac xmlrpc URL: http://trac.sagemath.org/xmlrpc (anonymous)

Re: [sage-devel] Automatic test of optional packages+updates

2015-06-13 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 13/06/15 12:41, Nathann Cohen wrote: This mail advertises a couple of changes that appeared in the latest beta: - sage -t now involves all (installed) optional packages by default [1] Cool! This means that if you installed an optional package X, you don't have to add

Re: [sage-devel] Functions returning sub-structure

2015-06-13 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: I think that the default of returning a sublattice makes most sense by far. Yes, if we have both then this should be the default. In case the speed difference is very significant (why would this be the case?), At least for now we don't have

Re: [sage-devel] The future of polybori

2015-06-13 Thread Francois Bissey
On 13/06/2015, at 22:00, 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel sage-devel@googlegroups.com wrote: Hi all, On Friday 12 Jun 2015 13:45:05 R. Andrew Ohana wrote: What about this: Now: We work on making polybori an optional package in sage. * At least going by this thread, the number of

Re: [sage-devel] The future of polybori

2015-06-13 Thread 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel
On Saturday 13 Jun 2015 10:08:32 Francois Bissey wrote: On 13/06/2015, at 22:00, 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel sage-devel@googlegroups.com wrote: Hi all, On Friday 12 Jun 2015 13:45:05 R. Andrew Ohana wrote: What about this: Now: We work on making polybori an optional

Re: [sage-devel] The future of polybori

2015-06-13 Thread mmarco
I am pretty much with Martin here (although i guess he uses polybory far more often than i do). I don't know much about autotools, but i can try to give a small hand on that and the python3 part. I hope with the arrival of July i will have some spare time for that. I am also considering

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 13/06/15 01:26, William Stein wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Franco Saliola sali...@gmail.com wrote: Here is a mini report on Sage Day 65. I'm not an organizer so this is not official. Thanks to Anne Schilling for helping to prepare this. - 24 tickets on trac are tagged with

Re: [sage-devel] Automatic test of optional packages+updates

2015-06-13 Thread Nathann Cohen
What is our politic about that? Should we force a patchbot green light with respect to all optional packages? A green patchbot is not exactly a requirement for a ticket to pass. It's more a help than anything else. You see what it says, act on that knowledge. 1) the set of installed optional

[sage-devel] Re: [GAP] GAP 4.7.8 release

2015-06-13 Thread Alexander Konovalov
Thanks. A proper announcement could be found at https://mail.gap-system.org/pipermail/gap/2015-June/000113.html. Alexander On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 3:04:55 PM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote: GAP 4.7.8 is out. I opened http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18689 -- Forwarded

Re: [sage-devel] The future of polybori

2015-06-13 Thread 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel
Hi all, On Friday 12 Jun 2015 13:45:05 R. Andrew Ohana wrote: What about this: Now: We work on making polybori an optional package in sage. * At least going by this thread, the number of people who use polybori in Sage is small enough for it to make sense to have polybori as an optional

Re: [sage-devel] The future of polybori

2015-06-13 Thread 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel
Hi all, FYI, I put this out. Let's see if there *are* other users besides me: https://martinralbrecht.wordpress.com/2015/06/13/polybori-is-dead-it-needs-your-help/ Cheers, Martin On Saturday 13 Jun 2015 11:00:16 Martin Albrecht wrote: Hi all, On Friday 12 Jun 2015 13:45:05 R. Andrew Ohana

Re: [sage-devel] The future of polybori

2015-06-13 Thread Francois Bissey
On 13/06/2015, at 22:30, 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel sage-devel@googlegroups.com wrote: On Saturday 13 Jun 2015 10:08:32 Francois Bissey wrote: On 13/06/2015, at 22:00, 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel sage-devel@googlegroups.com wrote: Hi all, On Friday 12 Jun 2015 13:45:05 R.

[sage-devel] Automatic test of optional packages+updates

2015-06-13 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hellooo everybody, This mail advertises a couple of changes that appeared in the latest beta: - sage -t now involves all (installed) optional packages by default [1] This means that if you installed an optional package X, you don't have to add --optional=sage,X to sage -t in order to

Re: [sage-devel] The future of polybori

2015-06-13 Thread 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel
Hi all, On Saturday 13 Jun 2015 10:41:15 Francois Bissey wrote: I think Andrew has already done quite a bit of the porting to autotools and some python 3 fixes. But neither he or I want to be a maintainer - at least for the long term. ah, sorry that I missed that. Great! How about this: 1.

[sage-devel] Copying installations on SMC (was: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report)

2015-06-13 Thread Darij Grinberg
Hi Anne, On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Anne Schilling a...@math.ucdavis.edu wrote: The SageMathCloud was great for those who had trouble installing Sage on their own computer. Sometimes we had connection issues to the SMC (the wheel was just spinning). Franco gave a nice talk on how to

Re: [sage-devel] Functions returning sub-structure

2015-06-13 Thread Johan S . R . Nielsen
I think that the default of returning a sublattice makes most sense by far. In case the speed difference is very significant (why would this be the case?), one could add an optional argument to the function to just return a list. Could be named as_list = False, I guess. Johan Jori Mäntysalo

Re: [sage-devel] Automatic test of optional packages+updates

2015-06-13 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 13/06/15 13:25, Nathann Cohen wrote: What is our politic about that? Should we force a patchbot green light with respect to all optional packages? A green patchbot is not exactly a requirement for a ticket to pass. It's more a help than anything else. You see what it says, act on that

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Darij Grinberg
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: The last public key is invalid, there is no space to set off the comment from the b64'ed key. Ah, thank you! I was overzealous in deleting whitespaces that came from the copypasting. -- You received this message

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Darij Grinberg
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: The last public key is invalid, there is no space to set off the comment from the b64'ed key. Ah, thank you! I was overzealous in deleting whitespaces that came from the copypasting. -- You received this message

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Volker Braun
The last public key is invalid, there is no space to set off the comment from the b64'ed key. On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 7:51:08 PM UTC+2, Darij Grinberg wrote: Hi, thanks to both of you for your help on step 3, but I've got another problem on step 4 now:

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Copying installations on SMC

2015-06-13 Thread Volker Braun
The last public key is invalid, there is no space to set off the comment from the b64'ed key. On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 7:51:08 PM UTC+2, Darij Grinberg wrote: Hi, thanks to both of you for your help on step 3, but I've got another problem on step 4 now:

[sage-devel] Re: Interfacing Kenzo with Sage?

2015-06-13 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
+1 to including it as an optional spkg, especially since it seems is easy to integrate. Best, Travis On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 12:34:33 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: Is there interest in providing algorithms available in Kenzo ( https://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~sergerar/Kenzo/

[sage-devel] Re: Inheriting from GradedAlgebras

2015-06-13 Thread Simon King
Hi Viviane, On 2015-06-11, Viviane Pons vivianep...@gmail.com wrote: --001a11c30bf01b2ff30518428ad5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes, but my problem is that I am inheriting in a file and that is not working at the moment. I did in the command line to show the error, but actually

Re: [sage-devel] Automatic test of optional packages+updates

2015-06-13 Thread Vincent Delecroix
All right, I now have a lot of optional packages on librae arb bliss cbc cryptominisat d3js database_cremona_ellcurve database_gap database_odlyzko_zeta database_pari database_stein_watkins database_symbolic_data gambit lidia modular_decomposition mpir nauty normaliz nose plantri python2 sage

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Volker Braun
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 1:27:30 AM UTC+2, William wrote: I'm also curious if anybody has any -- possibly *radical* -- suggestions about how to address this problem using new ideas. Use Docker (or boot2docker on OSX and Windows) to build and run Sage. Pro: Instant windows port.

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Volker Braun
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 1:27:30 AM UTC+2, William wrote: I'm also curious if anybody has any -- possibly *radical* -- suggestions about how to address this problem using new ideas. Use Docker (or boot2docker on OSX and Windows) to build and run Sage. Pro: Instant windows port.

[sage-devel] Interfacing Kenzo with Sage?

2015-06-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Is there interest in providing algorithms available in Kenzo (https://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~sergerar/Kenzo/) in Sage? In principle, Kenzo runs on ECL (with a 2-line patch, see https://github.com/dimpase/kenzo), and so can be embedded, just as Maxima is. Dima -- You received this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2015-06-13 01:26, William Stein wrote: suggestions about how to address this problem using new ideas. More testing? More and different buildbot machines testing more operating systems? Perhaps using VM's? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-devel] Automatic test of optional packages+updates

2015-06-13 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2015-06-13 22:21, Vincent Delecroix wrote: By the way I add trouble by installing some of them which tries to write in '/jones' or '/something' (that were two databases). Yes, there are some old packages which don't install anymore. In any case, like Nathann said, the automatic optional

Re: [sage-devel] Automatic test of optional packages+updates

2015-06-13 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2015-06-13 22:21, Vincent Delecroix wrote: The problem is that now some tests fail (with make ptestlong) sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/binary_tree.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t --long src/sage/homology/examples.py # 6 doctests failed sage -t --long src/sage/geometry/fan.py # 4

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread William Stein
On Saturday, June 13, 2015, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: On 2015-06-13 01:26, William Stein wrote: suggestions about how to address this problem using new ideas. More testing? More and different buildbot machines testing more operating systems? Perhaps using VM's? Andrew

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
OS X in VM's? Is that legal? Maybe only on OS X hardware? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-devel group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

[sage-devel] Re: Interfacing Kenzo with Sage?

2015-06-13 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 12:34:33 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: Is there interest in providing algorithms available in Kenzo ( https://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~sergerar/Kenzo/) in Sage? Absolutely! John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

2015-06-13 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com wrote: OS X in VM's? Is that legal? Maybe only on OS X hardware? It is legal on OS X hardware. In my office I have a mac pro with 32GB RAM, which could be used for build testing with VM's. It's not being used for much of