On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not have a strong opinion about whether lower case is better or not.
But I strongly support having a convention and mention it in the developer
manual. I opened #18974.
I would say that we already have
OK cool ! Thanks again !
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:40:46 PM UTC+2, Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Jul 31, 2015, at 08:36 , Pierre wrote:
Hi,
I have asked a version of this question here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/2KJQhOf-N7Y
However I now have
Dear Bernard,
Thanks for the note and links. I was not very aware of GIAC. It could be
a useful thing for MathBook XML authors to have available.
Have you considered using MathJax within your HTML output? It too is
Javascript and can be configured to execute locally.
Rob
On Friday, July
On Saturday, 1 August 2015 01:03:25 UTC+1, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 4:06:01 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
You don't need a closing tag that can be inserted by software,
as certainly is the case for \section or \item..
(unless you spent a large part of your life
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 4:06:01 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
You don't need a closing tag that can be inserted by software,
as certainly is the case for \section or \item..
(unless you spent a large part of your life writing HTML or XML by hand,
of course :-))
So where does a
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 4:06:01 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I wish Knuth did review (X)HTML format proposals for sanity...
I should add that MathBook XML adds no new syntax for mathematics proper.
In other words, symbols, equations, displays are not written in something
like MathML
On 07/31/2015 05:25 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
And if it is so easy to convert LaTeX into HTML, why hasn't anybody done it
successfully? tex4ht is the only one I know that comes close, and only
because it is the only one that uses the tex executable.
sure, why is this bad to use
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 2:26:59 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 10:22:50 UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote:
I prefer lower case (you don't want to miss a method in tab-completion
because of case).
I swear I spent 15 minutes last night looking for graphs.Chang* !
In most cases, MathBook XML is not more cumbersome than
LaTeX, particularly if you are using an editor which
automatically inserts closing tags. For example, in LaTeX
\section{...} starts a section, and you do not have to
explicitly indicate where the section ends. In MBX, you have
to supply
Hi,
The test takes about 92ms on my laptop (Sage 6.8.rc1, core i7-4600 @ 2.10 GHz).
So if it's a Sage 6.7-thing, it's fixed again :-)
Johan
William Stein writes:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Pierre pierre.guil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have asked a version of this question here:
I do not have a strong opinion about whether lower case is better or
not. But I strongly support having a convention and mention it in the
developer manual. I opened #18974.
Best,
Vincent
On 31/07/15 16:44, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 2:26:59 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik
I've created http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18975 for default
case-insensitive searching.
+1
This new default can only help.
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 7:44:50 AM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 2:26:59 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 10:22:50 UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote:
I prefer lower case (you don't want to miss a method in tab-completion
because of case).
Hi,
I have asked a version of this question here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/2KJQhOf-N7Y
However I now have a minimal working example, and sage-devel is perhaps
better than sage-support for this question (is it?)
So when working with multivariable polynomials over ZZ
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Pierre pierre.guil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have asked a version of this question here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/2KJQhOf-N7Y
However I now have a minimal working example, and sage-devel is perhaps
better than sage-support for
Thanks for your answers ! Let's hope it is fixed by 6.8 then. I shall
refrain from upgrading to 6.7 on my machine :-)
(and for 6.8 I will wait for osx binaries, and until I've upgraded to OSX
10.10)
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 6:36:03 PM UTC+2, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote:
Hi,
The test
I do not have a strong opinion about whether lower case is better or not.
But I strongly support having a convention and mention it in the developer
manual. I opened #18974.
I would say that we already have conventions about upper and lower
cases when it comes to functions (lower) and class
To revive a very old thread, OpenSSL is now in the process of
switching to a GPL-compatible license, finally!
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2015/08/01/cla/
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:45 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Volker Braun
Le vendredi 31 juillet 2015 03:17:27 UTC+2, Rob Beezer a écrit :
MathBook XML is the XML application I am designing. It is a collection
of XML tags meant to be usable for an author: chapter, section, theorem,
example, exercise, etc. I have written converters to LaTeX (for PDF,
print)
Hi Rob,
This is really very nice!
I took my first steps in algebra reading Tom Judson's book on my own,
quite some years ago. Already back then, math and programming were both
major interests of mine. Having Tom Judson's book containing intriguing
Sage examples and challenges makes it, it seems
Hello,
While working on http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18613 I ran into the
following problem:
sage: matrix(2, 1).echelon_form().is_mutable()
False
sage: matrix(2, 0).echelon_form().is_mutable()
True
i.e. while usually echelon_form returns an immutable matrix this is not the
case with
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 3:47:56 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
XML? I wish pandoc (http://pandoc.org/) could handle conversions to and
from your format...
Do people really want to write XML by hand? I tried it once (GAP docs can
be prepared using XML) and was not amused.
Just
On Friday, 31 July 2015 15:27:19 UTC+1, David Farmer wrote:
In most cases, MathBook XML is not more cumbersome than
LaTeX, particularly if you are using an editor which
automatically inserts closing tags.
You don't need a closing tag that can be inserted by software,
as certainly is
Dear Johan,
Thanks for taking the time to write. The encouragement helps! ;-)
Rob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Friday, 31 July 2015 02:59:26 UTC-6, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
In various places one sees things like Graph.tutte_polynomial,
Graph.lovasz_theta; whenever I see this (leave alone writing code like
this) I feel this is a typo, and it must become Graph.Tutte_polynomial, etc.
Am I alone here,
I prefer lower case (you don't want to miss a method in tab-completion
because of case). If it has to be upper case, then the best protection
against missing functions is to update it everywhere in Sage, so that users
expect it.
Nathann
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:59:26 AM UTC+2, Dima
In various places one sees things like Graph.tutte_polynomial,
Graph.lovasz_theta; whenever I see this (leave alone writing code like
this) I feel this is a typo, and it must become Graph.Tutte_polynomial, etc.
Am I alone here, or this ought to be capitalised throughout?
Dima
--
You received
On Friday, 31 July 2015 10:22:50 UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote:
I prefer lower case (you don't want to miss a method in tab-completion
because of case).
I swear I spent 15 minutes last night looking for graphs.Chang* !
Searched trac, searched the source, to no avail...
(it's in fact
On Friday, 31 July 2015 02:17:27 UTC+1, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 12:59:54 PM UTC-7, parisse wrote:
I had a quick look, but I'm still a little bit confused how the source
are written. Do you write your source files in xml or have you some kind of
converter from a
29 matches
Mail list logo
