On 17/08/15 09:27, David Roe wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Vincent Delecroix
20100.delecr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
As mentioned by Søren on ask [1] the subs method of matrices behave
differently than the subs method on coefficients
sage: R.x = PolynomialRing(ZZ)
sage: m =
On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 2:34:19 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2015-08-17 19:01, William Stein wrote:
Let's at least establish what people are likely to think sage -i
already is (after 10+ years of Sage).
I guess this is one of the questions: should Sage users be encouraged
How many packages currently have such (additional) dependencies now as
opposed to several years ago? I only expect it to install one package at a
time but I also can't remember installing a lot of packages that had
dependencies that weren't standard packages. Maybe we're separating out
There was a cron job setup for cleaning /tmp, but I just looked and it
seems like it was disabled... I re-enabled it and manually cleaned it at
the same time.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Vincent Delecroix
20100.delecr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Again...
Trac detected an internal
This should now be resolved.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Kwankyu Lee ekwan...@gmail.com wrote:
I looked into this thread because I have the same issue with the following
ticket.
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18807
Anyway, your ticket URL seems to have no problem :-)
--
You
Fantastic. Thanks!
On 17/08/15 19:18, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
There was a cron job setup for cleaning /tmp, but I just looked and it
seems like it was disabled... I re-enabled it and manually cleaned it at
the same time.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Vincent Delecroix
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
[...]
What would you like?
What does every other package manager do? (I am being somewhat
rhetorical because I think I know the answer.) Maybe we should do
what *everybody* else does in this case, to minimize
I'm first trying to build with the current Cython version. If that doesn't
work, then next I will try that.
Best,
Travis
On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 9:05:34 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 08:56:27 UTC-7, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
I'm using gcc version 4.9.3.s
This question is because of discussion at #18859.
The current behaviour of sage -i PKG is to install package PKG (if the
latest version of that package is not already installed), without
looking at the dependencies of PKG.
Now what should the recommended user interface be for installing a
On 2015-08-17 18:35, William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
[...]
What would you like?
What does every other package manager do?
I don't think that's relevant. The question is not whether or not it
should be possible to install
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2015-08-17 18:35, William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be
wrote:
[...]
What would you like?
What does every other package manager do?
I don't think
On Monday, 17 August 2015 08:56:27 UTC-7, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
I'm using gcc version 4.9.3.s
Is it able to build Sage on Linux?
I currently don't have access to a Linux system to test it, and I probably
won't for another 1-2 weeks.
did you try building sage's gcc (4.9.2) and
I'm using gcc version 4.9.3.s
Is it able to build Sage on Linux?
I currently don't have access to a Linux system to test it, and I probably
won't for another 1-2 weeks.
Best,
Travis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To
What would you like?
As your ticket aims at making users install packages in a way that takes
dependencies into account, I vote for (A) which does not change the command
that they are used to type to install packages.
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Vincent Delecroix
20100.delecr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
As mentioned by Søren on ask [1] the subs method of matrices behave
differently than the subs method on coefficients
sage: R.x = PolynomialRing(ZZ)
sage: m = matrix(R, [[x]])
sage:
On 2015-08-17 19:12, kcrisman wrote:
How many packages currently have such (additional) dependencies now as
opposed to several years ago?
Currently, the only packages which depend on a package which is not
standard are:
* python_igraph depending on igraph
* qepcad depending on saclib
By a
On 2015-08-17 19:01, William Stein wrote:
Let's at least establish what people are likely to think sage -i
already is (after 10+ years of Sage).
Personally, I see it as a low-level command, analogous to other
low-level commands like ./sage -b and ./sage --docbuild.
-i [packages] --
17 matches
Mail list logo
