Re: [sage-devel] Non-negative integer vectors

2017-09-28 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Good question :-) On 28/09/2017 20:00, Ursula Whitcher wrote: Yes, that looks like exactly the functionality I wanted! Why doesn't the documentation at http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/integer_vector.html link to the documentation for integer lists? --Ursula.

[sage-devel] trac not showing branch changes

2017-09-28 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
I've seen it happen before a few times and now Ursula Whitcher reports it while reviewing https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22391 : if you click on the branch name it just shows that 3 files are deleted, which is scary and useless. Would be nice to know what is causing this issue and how to fix

Re: [sage-devel] let's make FriCAS optional

2017-09-28 Thread mmarco
Indeed. This last GSoC there was some work to include the Rubi integrator in sympy. That could allow to compute a larger set of integrals (although I have read that it can be kind of slow). It would be a good idea to consider which one of these options we should call by default in each case.

Re: [sage-devel] Non-negative integer vectors

2017-09-28 Thread Ursula Whitcher
Yes, that looks like exactly the functionality I wanted! Why doesn't the documentation at http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/integer_vector.html link to the documentation for integer lists? --Ursula. On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 10:27:14 AM UTC-4,

Re: [sage-devel] doctesting tab completion

2017-09-28 Thread Volker Braun
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 9:26:57 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > basically, the crash comes from importing being done in a separate thread > rather than the main > thread. So an alternative way to trigger this would be to use the > appropriate multprocessing/threading module. >

[sage-devel] Re: doctesting tab completion

2017-09-28 Thread John H Palmieri
Is there a typo? Should the line causing the crash start with "from"? (Same question on the trac ticket.) On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 8:55:16 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > How does one write a doctest for tab completion on the command line? > I don't care for the output, I just

Re: [sage-devel] Non-negative integer vectors

2017-09-28 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Do you mean sage: IntegerListsLex(length=2, min_sum=0, max_sum=5).list() [[5, 0], [4, 1], [4, 0], [3, 2], [3, 1], [3, 0], [2, 3], [2, 2], [2, 1], [2, 0], [1, 4], [1, 3], [1, 2], [1, 1], [1, 0], [0, 5], [0, 4], [0, 3], [0, 2], [0, 1], [0, 0]] On 28/09/2017 15:55,

[sage-devel] Non-negative integer vectors

2017-09-28 Thread uaw
In preparation for Sage Days 91, I'm looking at the thesis of Malcolm Kotok (as in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19865 ). That thesis incorporates a class to list all non-negative integer vectors of a fixed length with sum less than n. I see that we already have an IntegerVectors class for

Re: [sage-devel] let's make FriCAS optional

2017-09-28 Thread kcrisman
On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 1:21:23 PM UTC-4, rjf wrote: > > To the extent that Macsyma/Maximaand Scratchpad/Axiom/Fricas have > overlapping capabilities, it would be interesting to have a competent > assessment as to > which of them should be used by Sage for some functionalities.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: changelogs missing in http://www.sagemath.org/changelogs/index.html

2017-09-28 Thread kcrisman
I'll try to have a look today. > That would be fantastic if this could be back up, granted the definitely nontrivial work involved getting it going again. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

[sage-devel] sage downloads

2017-09-28 Thread kcrisman
1) At http://www.sagemath.org/download-windows.html it still only has the virtual machine solution. Should Erik Bray's solution be there as well? 2) There are a LOT fewer mirrors than just a few months ago, if I read it right; North America used to have six or seven ... did something change?

Re: [sage-devel] doctesting tab completion

2017-09-28 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 6:54:59 AM UTC+1, David Roe wrote: > > I'm not sure, but maybe you can find the iPython call which is doing the > completion. Something like > > sage: from IPython import get_ipython > sage: ip = get_ipython() > sage: completer = ip.Completer > sage: