Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-09-04 Thread William Stein
Indeed, that link is no longer valid. Please visit this one instead: https://tinyurl.com/yac6cyzg On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 7:48 PM, saad khalid wrote: > Hello: > > The link seems to be broken, I was hoping to take a second look at some of > the items on the wishlist. is there any way you could

[sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-09-04 Thread saad khalid
Hello: The link seems to be broken, I was hoping to take a second look at some of the items on the wishlist. is there any way you could repost it? Thank you. -Saad On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 3:18:32 PM UTC-4, William wrote: > > Hi, > > I just wrote a short talk that I'm about to give at

[sage-devel] Persistent homology software

2018-09-04 Thread John H Palmieri
If anyone with topological interests wants a new project, take a look at incorporating these into Sage: - Ripser, "a lean C++ code for the computation of Vietoris–Rips persistence barcodes",http://ripser.org - Flagser, "Computing homology of directed flag complexes" (based on ripser),

Re: [sage-devel] r-3.4.4.p0 configure/install error

2018-09-04 Thread Nagesh Adluru
Wow! That did the trick!! Thanks for taking those guesses :) Best, Nagesh On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 3:25 PM John H Palmieri wrote: > I am not an expert in configure scripts, but it looks to me as though the > next thing in R's configure script deals with java. Maybe java is broken on > your

Re: [sage-devel] r-3.4.4.p0 configure/install error

2018-09-04 Thread John H Palmieri
I am not an expert in configure scripts, but it looks to me as though the next thing in R's configure script deals with java. Maybe java is broken on your system badly enough that it halts the configure script? You could try this: - copy the flies java and javac from

Re: [sage-devel] r-3.4.4.p0 configure/install error

2018-09-04 Thread Nagesh Adluru
Hi Dima and John, I got the libstd++-static installed. I did not use screen this time. I am not sure how to make "check ...static libraries" to yes. The gcc, g++ and gfortran are all version 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5). I am still getting the error for r. I am attaching the fresh log again

Re: [sage-devel] Tools to compute Hilbert Poincaré series

2018-09-04 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Note that some interest has recently emerged in renewing the Sage's interface to Macaulay2, see - Sage trac ticket 25885 Fixes for outdated Macaulay2 interface https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25885 For other Sage tickets related to Macaulay2, see

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Enabling Merge Requests from GitLab

2018-09-04 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 3:02 PM Daniel Krenn wrote: > > On 09/04/2018 02:33 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Let me make one important comment (something that I've said before > > though): a large part of what makes the current workflow work is not so > > much Trac itself but our git server and the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Enabling Merge Requests from GitLab

2018-09-04 Thread Erik Bray
Keeping in mind that this is still sort of off-topic, in my mind, from the subject at hand which is allowing merge request submissions from GitLab, which still get turned into Trac tickets... On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:33 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Let me make one important comment (something

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Enabling Merge Requests from GitLab

2018-09-04 Thread Daniel Krenn
On 09/04/2018 02:33 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Let me make one important comment (something that I've said before > though): a large part of what makes the current workflow work is not so > much Trac itself but our git server and the "git trac" scripts. > > For example, I very much like the fact

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Enabling Merge Requests from GitLab

2018-09-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:33 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Let me make one important comment (something that I've said before > though): a large part of what makes the current workflow work is not so > much Trac itself but our git server and the "git trac" scripts. > > For example, I very much like

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Enabling Merge Requests from GitLab

2018-09-04 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Let me make one important comment (something that I've said before though): a large part of what makes the current workflow work is not so much Trac itself but our git server and the "git trac" scripts. For example, I very much like the fact that we have a single git repo where all pull

Re: [sage-devel] Tools to compute Hilbert Poincaré series

2018-09-04 Thread Simon King
Hi Dima, On 2018-09-04, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > M2 needs a libgc-compatible version of everything, including fflas. That's > probably why > two copies etc. > > > M2 is maintained and developed. What is not maintained is Sagemath's M2 > package. I see. In that case: *IF* someone explains to me

Re: [sage-devel] Tools to compute Hilbert Poincaré series

2018-09-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, 11:57 Simon King, wrote: > Hi Clement, > > On 2018-09-04, Clement Pernet wrote: > > Le 02/09/2018 à 14:13, Simon King a écrit : > >> > /home/king/Projekte/Macaulay2/M2/M2/usr-host/include/fflas-ffpack/fflas/fflas_ftrsm_src.inl:279:27: > error: ‘openblas_set_num_threads’ was

Re: [sage-devel] Tools to compute Hilbert Poincaré series

2018-09-04 Thread Simon King
Hi Clement, On 2018-09-04, Clement Pernet wrote: > Le 02/09/2018 à 14:13, Simon King a écrit : >> /home/king/Projekte/Macaulay2/M2/M2/usr-host/include/fflas-ffpack/fflas/fflas_ftrsm_src.inl:279:27: >> error: ‘openblas_set_num_threads’ was not declared in this scope >>

Re: [sage-devel] Tools to compute Hilbert Poincaré series

2018-09-04 Thread Clement Pernet
Le 02/09/2018 à 14:13, Simon King a écrit : 5. Use Macaulay2 Bad: (a) The experimental spkg is broken, it won't install. (b) The installation instructions for Ubuntu on the project pages are rather verbose and require adding obscure repositories.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Enabling Merge Requests from GitLab

2018-09-04 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:04 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2018-09-03 15:53, Erik Bray wrote: > > P.S. If anyone has additional comments, positive or negative, on > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25914 they would be most appreciated > > That doesn't seem the right ticket. No, that's the

Re: [sage-devel] Tools to compute Hilbert Poincaré series

2018-09-04 Thread Simon King
FWIW: Hannes wrote in the Singular forum that he finds it a bad idea to use 64 bit integers, because it would behave differently on 32bit machines. He also argues that bigint vectors exist in Singular, since there are bigint *matrices* in Singular; right, but the syntax is different and thus it