For sure, you can.
Thanks !
t.d.
Le 14/12/2018 à 02:09, Travis Scrimshaw a écrit :
>
>
> On Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 1:28:09 AM UTC+10, William wrote:
>
> "COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS WITH SAGEMATH" is now in English and
> published on paper by a traditional publisher.
>
On Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 9:05:51 PM UTC-5, Amir Zia wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 8:38:45 PM UTC-5, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>>
>> Fri 2018-12-14 01:53 UTC+1, Amir Zia:
>> >
>> > Ubuntu 18.04
>> > Sagemath 8.1-7
>> > Texmacs 1.99.8
>> > the plugin is downloaded
On Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 8:38:45 PM UTC-5, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> Fri 2018-12-14 01:53 UTC+1, Amir Zia:
> >
> > Ubuntu 18.04
> > Sagemath 8.1-7
> > Texmacs 1.99.8
> > the plugin is downloaded from this page around 3 hours ago:
> >
>
Fri 2018-12-14 01:53 UTC+1, Amir Zia:
>
> Ubuntu 18.04
> Sagemath 8.1-7
> Texmacs 1.99.8
> the plugin is downloaded from this page around 3 hours ago:
> https://wiki.sagemath.org/TeXmacs?action=AttachFile=view=texmacs-sage.tar.gz
Oh, that wiki page is very out of date (we should add a
warning
On Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 1:28:09 AM UTC+10, William wrote:
>
> "COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS WITH SAGEMATH" is now in English and
> published on paper by a traditional publisher.
> http://bookstore.siam.org/ot160/
>
> There's also a free online version.
>
On Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 6:35:39 PM UTC-5, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> - What operating system?
> - What version of SageMath? How was it installed?
> - What version of TeXmacs?
> - What version of the TeXmacs Sage plugin?
> In particular is it the latest version from
>
- What operating system?
- What version of SageMath? How was it installed?
- What version of TeXmacs?
- What version of the TeXmacs Sage plugin?
In particular is it the latest version from
https://github.com/texmacs/SageMath.tm
?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Here is what I was getting at the beginning after going to
insert/session/sage:
[image: texmacs.jpg]
then I realized I should add sage to $PATH, So this is what I did:
which sage
Output: /usr/bin/sage
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/sage /usr/local/bin/
Now, This is the error I am getting:
[image:
Once I got cryptominisat installed, I was able to replicate the bug. I also
rearranged the equations and got it to solve as well, without rearranging the
order of the variables.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 13, 2018, at 11:58 AM, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
>
> I tested cryptominisat, picosat
I tested cryptominisat, picosat and glucose. Glucose (added as a optional
or experimental package in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26361) finds a
solution in the first case. In the second case (variables in reverse
order), all of them finds something.
My experiments are copied below.
sage:
It seems one now needs to specify the marker edge color.
This might have to do with the upgrade to matplotlib 2.2.2
in [Sage Trac ticket 25702](https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25702).
One can discover the existence of the optional argument `markeredgecolor`
by reading the documentation for
Hi Mate,
On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 10:39:02 PM UTC+1, Mate Soos wrote:
>
> OK, so I need to understand this a bit more and need a bit of
> hand-holding. The issue as far as I understand is the following:
>
> 1) If the equations are entered in one way, the solution is found.
> Solution
This week I was using Sage on cocalc.com to generate some graphs for a
Calculus I final. Earlier in the semester, I had generated some graphs
with discontinuities and I used the point() function to draw some open
circles and closed circles that denote closed and open endpoints of a graph
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 16:42, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Le 13/12/2018 à 17:17, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
> > On 2018-12-13 13:11, John Cremona wrote:
> >> The problem is that t is a pari gen and Sage tries too hard to compare
> >> that with python 0.
> >
> > This has
Le 13/12/2018 à 17:17, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
On 2018-12-13 13:11, John Cremona wrote:
The problem is that t is a pari gen and Sage tries too hard to compare
that with python 0.
This has nothing to do with Sage or Python, the "problem" is that PARI
considers [0] and 0 equal.
Which make
The binary tetrahedral group has order 24, but the "Tetra" group as defined
here:
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/groups/sage/groups/matrix_gps/finitely_generated.html
has order 48.
sage: K. = CyclotomicField(4)
sage: Tetra = MatrixGroup([(-1+i)/2,(-1+i)/2, (1+i)/2,(-1-i)/2], [0,i,
On 2018-12-13 13:11, John Cremona wrote:
The problem is that t is a pari gen and Sage tries too hard to compare
that with python 0.
This has nothing to do with Sage or Python, the "problem" is that PARI
considers [0] and 0 equal.
Personally, I think that Sage (really the package cypari2
In 8.4:
sage: F1 = NumberField(x,'b')
sage: F2 = F1
sage: F1==F2
True
sage: F1.is_isomorphic(F2)
False
Oops. In the code the work is done in the line
t = self.pari_polynomial().nfisisom(other.pari_polynomial())
which in this case returns [0], meaning that the element 0 in F1 satisfies
the
Le jeudi 13 décembre 2018 04:48:20 UTC+1, kcrisman a écrit :
> That's all great news, and especially thanks and congratulations to the
> whole team who worked on both the French and English versions!
>
Indeed this book is excellent! Congratulations to the authors!
Eric.
--
You received
I have a concrete and reproducible example where doing more doctests in a
file breaks other, unrelated,
doctests, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26856#comment:8
I don't even know where to start debugging this...
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 12:58:34 PM UTC, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
