Re: [sage-devel] error while building sage

2019-03-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:04 PM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel wrote: > > > > > On Mar 5, 2019, at 08:06 , John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > In case others have this problem before the next beta is released: not just > > sphinx is missing as a dependency, but also ppl. You should do > > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

2019-03-05 Thread kcrisman
On Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 12:01:16 PM UTC-5, Harald Schilly wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:36 AM Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > >> > So I just ran into this now that it is not in the "usual" place >>

Re: [sage-devel] error while building sage

2019-03-05 Thread 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel
> On Mar 5, 2019, at 08:06 , John H Palmieri wrote: > > In case others have this problem before the next beta is released: not just > sphinx is missing as a dependency, but also ppl. You should do > > ./sage -i sphinx ppl > > followed by > > make I have seen this now with 2 of 3

Re: [sage-devel] Linux build fails on sagelib (and numpy?)

2019-03-05 Thread Ike Stoddard
THANK YOU! On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 09:58 E. Madison Bray wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:34 AM Ike Stoddard > wrote: > > > > But why not ATLAS? Should I look at the numpy makefile? > > I have reported this before as https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20507 > > > > -- > You received this

Re: [sage-devel] short python3 report (March of the last python2 year)

2019-03-05 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Le 05/03/2019 à 19:53, Nils Bruin a écrit : On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 10:27:47 AM UTC-8, vdelecroix wrote: Just to give some elements of comparison. Following the specifications of the standard math library in C what MPFR [3] does is that - "floor", "ceil", "round", "trunc" are the

Re: [sage-devel] short python3 report (March of the last python2 year)

2019-03-05 Thread Nils Bruin
On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 10:27:47 AM UTC-8, vdelecroix wrote: > > Just to give some elements of comparison. Following the specifications > of the standard math library in C what MPFR [3] does is that > > - "floor", "ceil", "round", "trunc" are the standard rounding > functions to some

Re: [sage-devel] short python3 report (March of the last python2 year)

2019-03-05 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Le 05/03/2019 à 17:32, E. Madison Bray a écrit : On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 2:12 PM Frédéric Chapoton wrote: Hello everybody. In sage 8.7.b6 built with python3, there are now 464 failing doctests, in a total of 137 files. Among these files, 55 have just one failing doctest. The worst file is

Re: [sage-devel] Error when installing rst2ipynb --- log attached

2019-03-05 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Le mar. 5 mars 2019 à 16:34, E. Madison Bray a écrit : > > Hi Samuel (and anyone else reading as I'm just posting this to help > future readers), > > This is misleading, unfortunately (I have been misled by it myself). > The "pandoc" that's on PyPI [1] is *not* ("the Haskell program > 'pandoc'")

Re: [sage-devel] ValueError: filedescriptor out of range in select()

2019-03-05 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2019-03-03 11:48, Vincent Delecroix wrote: > > Is this supposed to crash Sage? > > OK, I missed that part. The fact that you run out of file descriptors is > not a bug, but the fact that it crashes Sage is a bug. I'm not sure I'd even

Re: [sage-devel] error while building sage

2019-03-05 Thread 'RAJAT MITTAL' via sage-devel
Thank You for the prompt response after using ./sage -i sphinx ppl it built successfully. On Tue 5 Mar, 2019, 9:36 PM John H Palmieri In case others have this problem before the next beta is released: not > just sphinx is missing as a dependency, but also ppl. You should do > > ./sage -i

Re: [sage-devel] short python3 report (March of the last python2 year)

2019-03-05 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 2:12 PM Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > > Hello everybody. > > In sage 8.7.b6 built with python3, there are now 464 failing doctests, in a > total of 137 files. Among these files, 55 have just one failing doctest. The > worst file is now 'src/sage/matroids/matroid.pyx' with 22

Re: [sage-devel] error while building sage

2019-03-05 Thread John H Palmieri
In case others have this problem before the next beta is released: not just sphinx is missing as a dependency, but also ppl. You should do ./sage -i sphinx ppl followed by make On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 2:56:00 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Thanks, you found a bug in Sage -

Re: [sage-devel] Error when installing rst2ipynb --- log attached

2019-03-05 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:40 AM Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > To install pandoc, you can run > > sage --pip install pandoc > > or first enter a sage shell by running > > sage --sh > > and in the sage shell run > > pip install pandoc > > and finally exit the sage shell by running > >

Re: [sage-devel] error while building sage

2019-03-05 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Tue 2019-03-05 11:56:00 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik: > > Thanks, you found a bug in Sage - it's missing dependency of pplpy on sphinx > > To work around it, do > > ./sage -i sphinx > > followed by > > make Note: this was reported and fixed at - Sage Trac ticket 27403: pplpy full build failure

Re: [sage-devel] error while building sage

2019-03-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Thanks, you found a bug in Sage - it's missing dependency of pplpy on sphinx To work around it, do ./sage -i sphinx followed by make On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:18 AM rajat.mittal.mat15 via sage-devel wrote: > > Hello, > I am installing sage's developer version using following > >