+1 for threejs as default.
David
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 7:24 PM Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> +1 for making the default threejs.
>
> Best,
> Travis
>
> On Monday, September 23, 2019 at 9:51:23 PM UTC+10, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>>
>> Dear Sage-dev,
>>
>> This is a poll to make three.js
+1 for making the default threejs.
Best,
Travis
On Monday, September 23, 2019 at 9:51:23 PM UTC+10, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Dear Sage-dev,
>
> This is a poll to make three.js (https://threejs.org/) the default 3d
> viewer
> in Sage, in replacement of Jmol
Le lundi 23 septembre 2019 13:51:23 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
> Indeed, thanks to the work of Paul Masson, the three.js 3d viewer is doing
> a
> very good job in displaying Sage 3d plots, as you can see in these examples
> taken from Sage reference's manual:
>
>
Le lundi 23 septembre 2019 21:41:55 UTC+2, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) a
écrit :
>
>
> Also, the java issue is now fixed, which also means that jmol is still
> maintained.
>
>
Yes. To be 100% clear: this poll is not about deprecating Jmol, but about
making three.js the default.
Eric.
--
Le lundi 23 septembre 2019 14:53:32 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>
>
>
>- The "minor transparency issues" he mentions may deprive the
>resulting plot of part of its mathematical meaning (for example, the plot
>of a sphere and a cone can curently clobber the display of the
+1 for threejs
I tried to compare the two: in a single Jupyter notebook, I plotted the
same function with both viewers. threejs produced the plot faster, and it
was snappier when rotating, zooming, etc. (This is with both Firefox and
Safari on OS X.) Same from the command-line: the threejs
Hi Simon,
the py3 image has the tag :develop-py3 instead of :develop. That image is a bit
old unfortunately since https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28041 (positive
review) has not been merged yet.
I'm not a travis expert but I think you want to add a matrix that adds an
environment variable say
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 07:32:48AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
> > That said, I support the idea of the switch of defaults (if only because
> > of spite against Java ;-).
> >>
> Though I believe we mostly use Jmol in its jsmol form in the notebooks, for
> what it's worth :-) Nonetheless having a
> That said, I support the idea of the switch of defaults (if only because
> of spite against Java ;-).
>>
>>
>>
Though I believe we mostly use Jmol in its jsmol form in the notebooks, for
what it's worth :-) Nonetheless having a fully functional threejs is great
news too.
--
You received
Eric quite eloquently made the case for threejs. I tend to agree with him
on most of the points. However, a couple points should be complemented:
- The "minor transparency issues" he mentions may deprive the resulting
plot of part of its mathematical meaning (for example, the plot of a
Dear Sage-dev,
This is a poll to make three.js (https://threejs.org/) the default 3d viewer
in Sage, in replacement of Jmol (https://sourceforge.net/projects/jmol/).
Indeed, thanks to the work of Paul Masson, the three.js 3d viewer is doing a
very good job in displaying Sage 3d plots, as you can
11 matches
Mail list logo
