The glpk test failures are being discussed at
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29493.
On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 1:19:51 PM UTC-7, Andy Howell wrote:
>
> I originally sent this to sage-release when 9.1 was released. I see the
> same test failures under 9.2.beta0. I didn't see a way to make
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:55 PM Michael Jung wrote:
>
> Sorry, I meant: "especially for the division-free algorithm of the
> determinant."
>
> Am Freitag, 29. Mai 2020 23:46:55 UTC+2 schrieb Michael Jung:
>>
>> Dear Sage Developers,
>> is there a mutliprocessing support available for
Sorry, I meant: "especially for the division-free algorithm of the
determinant."
Am Freitag, 29. Mai 2020 23:46:55 UTC+2 schrieb Michael Jung:
>
> Dear Sage Developers,
> is there a mutliprocessing support available for computations with
> matrices of large dimensions? Especially with respect
Dear Sage Developers,
is there a mutliprocessing support available for computations with matrices
of large dimensions? Especially with respect to the division-free algorithm?
Best wishes
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 1:19:51 PM UTC-7, Andy Howell wrote:
>
> I originally sent this to sage-release when 9.1 was released. I see the
> same test failures under 9.2.beta0. I didn't see a way to make exceptions
> for which system packages are used if installed, based on the OS release.
>
I originally sent this to sage-release when 9.1 was released. I see the
same test failures under 9.2.beta0. I didn't see a way to make
exceptions for which system packages are used if installed, based on the
OS release. Maybe the best option is to simply document the configure
options under
Dear all,
I've tagged Flint 2.6.0-rc3 [2]. The new changes are:
* better support for old version of MSVC (fix some prototypes)
* support for building Flint without pthreads (only useful for old platforms)
* add const to some mpoly functions
As these are not considered serious problems, the
On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 9:25:53 AM UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> Le 29/05/2020 à 18:17, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:56 PM Vincent Delecroix
> > <20100.d...@gmail.com > wrote:
> >> I do have a gcc 10 that sage configure does not accept. How do I force
> >>
Hi Dima,
Le 29/05/2020 à 18:17, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
Hi Vincent,
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:56 PM Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,
I do have a gcc 10 that sage configure does not accept. How do I force
./configure to pick gcc from the system (I don't care if
Hi Vincent,
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:56 PM Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I do have a gcc 10 that sage configure does not accept. How do I force
> ./configure to pick gcc from the system (I don't care if things break, I
> would rather fix them than compile
Dear all,
I do have a gcc 10 that sage configure does not accept. How do I force
./configure to pick gcc from the system (I don't care if things break, I
would rather fix them than compile gcc)?
Naively, I thought that the `--force` option would do that but instead
it stops the configure
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 10:44:30 PM UTC-7, matthew Drescher wrote:
>
> I have written some code which runs k rounds of Sherali-Adams relaxation
> hierarchy on a system Ax >= b. It was enough of a pain that I would like to
> potentially save others from it in the future :-)
> So I am
Thank you Vincent, Matthias and Michael for your answers!
Best regards,
Eric.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
13 matches
Mail list logo
