I think it might be related to Mac having an old version of makeinfo. I
see from your config.log that you use homebrew. To get ECL to build you
can try
brew install texinfo
export PATH="/usr/local/opt/texinfo/bin:$PATH"
and then rerunning configure and make. I haven't tested with sage, but
I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30173 for this
On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 5:50:30 PM UTC-7, David Einstein wrote:
>
> Attempting to rebuild sage I run into problems building ecl. This baffles
> me, as it seems to die while building the documentation for ecl.
> Attached are the
Looks like a missing makeinfo problem. I thought we had a fix for that included.
But I only poorly followed the ecl upgrade ticket due to other commitments.
> On 19/07/2020, at 12:50 PM, David Einstein wrote:
>
> Attempting to rebuild sage I run into problems building ecl. This baffles
> me,
On 19.07.20 01:01, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 2:57:21 PM UTC-7, Christian Nassau wrote:
Hi Sverre,
I don't think it's a good idea to have different zeroes in an
algebraic structure that is also categorized as an abelian group,
unless you take the
On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 2:57:21 PM UTC-7, Christian Nassau wrote:
>
> Hi Sverre,
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to have different zeroes in an algebraic
> structure that is also categorized as an abelian group, unless you take the
> point that a "graded abelian group" should not be
Can you give a specific example of a computation in which you care about
the degree where your zero element lives? Or where you can't just recover
it from its component elements (if ab=0, then you have an element in degree
= deg(a) + deg(b)). I'm struggling to understand this.
If you are doing
On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 11:31:43 PM UTC+2, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> In any case where the degree matters, you should first test whether an
> element is zero (in which case it won't have a degree) and then perhaps
> whether it is homogeneous. If not, you can raise an error (to keep
Hi Sverre,
I don't think it's a good idea to have different zeroes in an algebraic
structure that is also categorized as an abelian group, unless you take
the point that a "graded abelian group" should not be an "abelian group".
But let me also point out that something similar to what you
Hi,
Thank you for your comments so far. I feel I need to expand some more on
the issue of zero elements which is the central thing for the problem we
are adressing.
It is mathematically equivalent to think of a graded k-algebra A as either
1) a direct sum A = \bigosum_i A_i, together with a
On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 2:31:01 AM UTC-7, Sverre Lunøe-Nielsen wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> I have been involved in preparing a package by M. Catanzaro and R. Bruner
> lately, which implements finitely presented modules over the mod `p`
> Steenrod algebra.
>
> We have encountered a conflict
Developers interested in the Jupyter notebook may also want to look into
working on the overdue upgrade of relevant packages -- see
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26919
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from
Hi Sverre,
I ran into similar problems in my "yacop" package
(https://github.com/cnassau/yacop-sage), which also deals with graded
modules over the Steenrod algebra.
I think when I began, Sage didn't even have its own category of graded
things, so I ended up inventing my own category of
I am working on making A/D, primarily on Raspberry Pis, easier to use
within the Jupyter notebook by providing some GUI elements for setting up
the data collection. Everything is available as python 3 packages so should
install in a Sagemath kernel. I haven't tried doing that as you have to be
Hello,
On Jul 18, Sverre Lunøe-Nielsen wrote:
Dear list,
I have been involved in preparing a package by M. Catanzaro and R. Bruner
lately, which implements finitely presented modules over the mod `p` Steenrod
algebra.
We have encountered a conflict regarding how to present graded objects,
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020, 23:41 Grant Ellis, wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In regards to the interest in making Sagemath present on the Raspberry Pi
> platform it would be helpful in also having the GPIO module available in
> Sagemath.
>
> It would be helpful to have Sagemath be able to access
yes, this beta is a bit broken w.r.t. ./sage -b
See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30153
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 9:32 AM Michael Jung wrote:
>
> Apparently, the makefile in src is missing somehow. But the original build
> was successful.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are
Dear list,
I have been involved in preparing a package by M. Catanzaro and R. Bruner
lately, which implements finitely presented modules over the mod `p`
Steenrod algebra.
We have encountered a conflict regarding how to present graded objects, and
I am writing to the list to get other
Apparently, the makefile in src is missing somehow. But the original build
was successful.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hello,
today, I have built Sage 9.2.beta5 completely from scratch. I wanted to
checkout a ticket and quickly rebuild the source code by using "./sage -b".
Surprisingly, I got the following error message (I hope, it is correctly
translated into English):
make: *** No targets specified and no
19 matches
Mail list logo
