Re: [sage-devel] Unimodular transformation matrix of LLL algorithm

2020-09-28 Thread 'Martin R. Albrecht' via sage-devel
Hi there, Sage is using FP(y)LLL under the hood, so there shouldn’t be that much of a performance difference. As far as I can see, both Sage and FPyLLL have the same defaults so it’s not clear to me why you see this performance difference. Cheers, Martin Santanu Sarkar writes: > Dear

Re: [sage-devel] Unimodular transformation matrix of LLL algorithm

2020-09-28 Thread Santanu Sarkar
Dear Nils, Thanks a lot for your help. On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 08:27, Nils Bruin wrote: > > > On Sunday, September 27, 2020 at 1:48:03 PM UTC-7, Santanu Sarkar wrote: >> >> Dear Nils, >>Thank you so much for your comments. >> I consider Matrix E=[I,M1], where I is identity matrix. >>