[sage-devel] Downgrade R to optional? See #31409.

2021-03-07 Thread John H Palmieri
Dear all, You should be aware that ticket #31409 (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31409) intends to downgrade R to an optional package because of difficulties building it on Cygwin. Just letting you know in case you care about R being part of Sage and/or you have ideas about how to fix the

[sage-devel] Re: python3-3.8.5 won't compile under Big Sur

2021-03-07 Thread Volker Braun
Looks like its #31326, but I posted some details to #30651 On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 8:16:08 PM UTC+1 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Details please -> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30651 > > On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 3:16:37 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > >> For the record, I've set up a BS

[sage-devel] Re: Help needed with adding user packages as optional/experimental packages

2021-03-07 Thread Matthias Koeppe
9.3.beta8 adds: snappy On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 4:49:23 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > The first few user packages have been added in 9.3.beta7: > ore_algebra, sage_flatsurf, admcycles, slabbe, surface_dynamics. > > > On Wednesday, January 13, 2021 at 7:41:48 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe

[sage-devel] Re: python3-3.8.5 won't compile under Big Sur

2021-03-07 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Details please -> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30651 On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 3:16:37 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > For the record, I've set up a BS buildbot at http://build.sagemath.org, > but it currently doesn't succeed in compiling Sage. > > > > On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 9:01:51

[sage-devel] Re: python3-3.8.5 won't compile under Big Sur

2021-03-07 Thread Volker Braun
For the record, I've set up a BS buildbot at http://build.sagemath.org, but it currently doesn't succeed in compiling Sage. On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 9:01:51 PM UTC+1 harald@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to compile Sage on a Mac running macOS 11.2.2 (Big Sur). > (I first