Re: [sage-devel] "Copy" vs "Refactor"

2022-04-24 Thread Matthias Koeppe
"configure" was deliberately made a separate, manual step because users need to read (and act upon) its output. On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 10:21:45 PM UTC-7 hohoa...@gmail.com wrote: > P.S: > """ > Everyone wants the top-level "sage" script to work out of the box > without being configured,

Re: [sage-devel] "Copy" vs "Refactor"

2022-04-24 Thread ph h
P.S: """ Everyone wants the top-level "sage" script to work out of the box without being configured, built, or installed """ > Maybe experienced users in this camp can share some undocumented use case scenarios? While waiting for someone to share their secrets, It was found that the "advanced

[sage-devel] Re: Did you run configure?

2022-04-24 Thread John H Palmieri
If they indeed haven't run `./configure`, then they should. I think it's not too much to ask someone to read the README file before trying to build Sage. If they have already run `./configure`, then the error message needs to be fixed. On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 7:19:45 PM UTC-7 Matthias

[sage-devel] Re: Did you run configure?

2022-04-24 Thread Matthias Koeppe
The error message could be improved. I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33753 for this. On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 5:36:04 PM UTC-7 hohoa...@gmail.com wrote: > Dear All, > > Someone is trying to build and run 'sage' with this advanced incantation > 'sage -br' > >

[sage-devel] Re: Memory Leak in canonical_label with bliss?

2022-04-24 Thread 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel
Hi Thomas, Could the memleak be coming from within bliss? Best, Travis On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 1:50:26 AM UTC+9 t.will...@gmail.com wrote: > Dear all, > > there seems to be a memory leak in canonical_label(...), using bliss. > Here is a test script to demonstrate the problem: > >

[sage-devel] Did you run configure?

2022-04-24 Thread ph h
Dear All, Someone is trying to build and run 'sage' with this advanced incantation 'sage -br' ~/sage-9.6/rc0.mod2$ sage.GOOD/sage -br and she was asked " Did you run configure?" Unfortunately, "sage --advanced" does not give any incantation for this ('sage -c' is NOT for 'configure') She is

Re: [sage-devel] Limitations of GAP interface

2022-04-24 Thread Dima Pasechnik
the following works with Sage 9.6.rc1 sage: t=libgap.function_factory('''function() : local Q, KQ, rel, A; : LoadPackage("qpa"); : Q:=Quiver(3,[[1,2,"a"],[2,3,"b"]]); : KQ:=PathAlgebra(GF(3),Q); : AssignGeneratorVariables(KQ); : rel:=[a*b]; : A:=KQ/rel; : return A;

Re: [sage-devel] ~/.sage and sage-cleaner

2022-04-24 Thread ph h
P.S: It happened because sage was run before 'make configure' was done ~/sage-9.6$ git/sage.mod/sage On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 5:43 PM ph h wrote: > Dear All, > > When is it safe to clean up '~./.sage' ? > How can 'sage-cleaner' be invoked manually? > Why is it invoked because of

[sage-devel] ~/.sage and sage-cleaner

2022-04-24 Thread ph h
Dear All, When is it safe to clean up '~./.sage' ? How can 'sage-cleaner' be invoked manually? Why is it invoked because of 'ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'sage'? Please find appended below the console output Regards, phiho Sourcing /home/hph/sage-9.6/git/sage.mod/resolvelinks.dot,

[sage-devel] Limitations of GAP interface

2022-04-24 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
This has been reported at https://github.com/sagemath/sagecell/issues/560 but as far as I can see is the problem of GAP interface in Sage itself. Perhaps somebody familiar with it may want to take a look ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups