Hallo,
Ok, by brute forcing i.e. removing Brew, the sage installation proceeded
without problems (and still compiling as of now, if I don't reply later, it
means it worked).
The above tickets seem to head in the right direction: it seems odd that
sage would detect automatically that brew is
>From your config.log:
configure:84048: checking for the package system in use configure:84051:
result: homebrew
It looks like you have linuxbrew installed (sorry, I didn't see that before
when I looked at your log).
This is an untested configuration.
See
Try if it goes away if you uninstall the ecl system package
On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 10:05:37 AM UTC-7 jplab wrote:
> Here they are.
>
> Le mercredi 4 mai 2022 à 12:26:02 UTC-4, Matthias Koeppe a écrit :
>
>> Top-level config.log and full ecl build log please
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 4, 2022
Top-level config.log and full ecl build log please
On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 9:11:22 AM UTC-7 jplab wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I haven't compiled sage for too long (shame on me...). I have a fresh
> installation of Debian bullseye, and the compilation fails at ecl-21.2.1.
> The relevant log
Hello,
I haven't compiled sage for too long (shame on me...). I have a fresh
installation of Debian bullseye, and the compilation fails at ecl-21.2.1.
The relevant log mentions:
Building ecl_min...
25 ./ecl_min: error while loading shared libraries: libffi.so.8: cannot
open shared object
I am guessing that Travis' Representation class does the trick, but I have
to figure out how to use it.
On Wednesday, 4 May 2022 at 13:40:07 UTC+2 kcrisman wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 7:48:07 AM UTC-4 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>> Won't you be better off thinking of it as a
On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 01:56 -0400, ph h wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Sadly, readlink is not a POSIX standard utility; otherwise we would
> > already be using it in place of resolvelinks().
>
> In that case, please try this:
>
> #SELF=$(readlink -f $0)
> SELF=$(cd `dirname $0` ; pwd)/`basename $0`
>
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:02 AM 'Martin R' via sage-devel
wrote:
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33784 is now ready for review.
>
Thank you!
Here's another example, for those following this thread:
sage: A = lambda g, x: g(x)
sage: Gamma = graphs.ButterflyGraph()
sage: G =
On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 7:48:07 AM UTC-4 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:
> Won't you be better off thinking of it as a representation, then?
>
>
Correct, but I don't know how to construct those on arbitrary vector spaces
in Sage. That is to say, if I know the vector space, and I know the
action,
Hi William,
Le dimanche 1 mai 2022 à 19:24:54 UTC+2, wst...@gmail.com a écrit :
> Hello Sage-Devel,
>
> The 3 people who expressed interest in being on the Sage dev prize
> committee are me, John Cremona, and Karl-Dieter Crisman. Would
> anybody else like to be on the committee?
Sorry for
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33784 is now ready for review.
I am still open for discussion, of course. In particular, we might want to
discuss whether we should also provide a separate class which models a
group action, and not only the homomorphic image of the acting group.
Martin
On
11 matches
Mail list logo
