Re: [sage-devel] Re: Colours

FWIW: I've observed a similar behavior (see this post ). I was using Firefox with a markdown plugin. In the preview, MD rendered correctly (I used quotes (">") and inline code ("`") tags). After posting, MD was removed and

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

On Sat, 4 Feb 2023, 16:29 Matthias Koeppe, wrote: > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:09:15 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > There is no reason for "real" github accounts to be marked as mannequins. > > No, you are mistaken. > > An org can only create issues & comments in the name of its

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

Nathan Cohen stopped contributing to Sage definitively around the time William started SageMathCloud (now cocalc) as he thought that William was profiting from his work. I couldn't find any posts from him since 2013. John On Sat, 4 Feb 2023, 16:29 Matthias Koeppe, wrote: > On Saturday,

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:09:15 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: There is no reason for "real" github accounts to be marked as mannequins. No, you are mistaken. An org can only create issues & comments in the name of its members, not arbitrary GitHub users. Which is why the invites had

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 12:22 PM Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > 2) GitHub nathanncohen is a real GitHub account, not a mannequin - and > it corresponds to Trac's ncohen just fine. > > Perhaps he didn't respond to the recent invitation. There is no reason for "real" github accounts to be marked as

[sage-devel] Re: Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

I plan to start the final import today (Saturday) at 22:00 UTC. On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 2:38:10 AM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > The first preview is now available at https://github.com/sagemath/sage > (it is "archived", i.e., read-only). > > -- You received this message because you

[sage-devel] Re: Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 3:11:47 AM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote: An issue with many comments folds the comments in middle. For example, https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/34340 It's inconvenient to unfold it again and again. Is there a configuration that leave them unfolded by default?

[sage-devel] Re: problem building pyscipopt

The real error appears farther down in the log. src/pyscipopt/scip.c: In function '__Pyx_AddTraceback': src/pyscipopt/scip.c:463:62: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'PyFrameObject' {aka 'struct _frame'} 463 | #define __Pyx_PyFrame_SetLineNumber(frame, lineno)

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 4:22:55 AM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote: 2) GitHub nathanncohen is a real GitHub account, not a mannequin - and it corresponds to Trac's ncohen just fine. Perhaps he didn't respond to the recent invitation. That's correct – one of many outstanding invitations -

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 7:22 AM Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > 2) GitHub nathanncohen is a real GitHub account, not a mannequin - and > it corresponds to Trac's ncohen just fine. > > Perhaps he didn't respond to the recent invitation. > Dima would know better than I, but my guess is that Nathann Cohen

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

2) GitHub nathanncohen is a real GitHub account, not a mannequin - and it corresponds to Trac's ncohen just fine. Perhaps he didn't respond to the recent invitation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

It seems it's still being updated. On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:44:49 PM UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > 1) there is something funny with search - it it because it's still not > done? > > > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues?q=is%3Aissue+strongly+regular+is%3Aopen > > gives > > 5

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:11 AM Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > An issue with many comments folds the comments in middle. For example, > > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/34340 > > It's inconvenient to unfold it again and again. one reason for this is probably that it takes extra bandwidth and

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

1) there is something funny with search - it it because it's still not done? https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues?q=is%3Aissue+strongly+regular+is%3Aopen gives 5 Open 71 Closed No results matched your search. so there are 5 open issues, but they are not shown. (searching

[sage-devel] Re: Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

An issue with many comments folds the comments in middle. For example, https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/34340 It's inconvenient to unfold it again and again. Is there a configuration that leave them unfolded by default? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[sage-devel] problem building pyscipopt

I built sage 9.8.rc0 from scratch, and then did ./sage -i pyscipopt, but this failed. The log is attached. I get the same result with 9.8.beta7 (but I did not build it from scratch). The puzzle is that I believe I had SCIP already working. I do not understand the error message at all:

[sage-devel] Re: Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

Thank you! On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 7:38:10 PM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > The first preview is now available at https://github.com/sagemath/sage > (it is "archived", i.e., read-only). > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel"

[sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

The first preview is now available at https://github.com/sagemath/sage (it is "archived", i.e., read-only). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Migration end date changed to Monday Feb 6 at 08:00 UTC

Thanks for keeping us posted and above all for all the hard work all of you are doing. As they say in French: *Bon courage !* Guillermo On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 at 03:38, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > We've hit a technical problem in the import (for which we already have > identified a solution), so I