Re: [sage-devel] Migration to GitHub complete

2023-02-05 Thread G. M.-S.
Huge thanks to everybody involved. Guillermo On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 08:03, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > https://github.com/sagemath/sage > > See > https://github.com/sagemath/trac-to-github/blob/master/docs/Migration-Trac-to-Github.md > for a transition guide from Trac to GitHub. > -- You

[sage-devel] Re: Migration to GitHub complete

2023-02-05 Thread Kwankyu Lee
Great! Thank you! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

[sage-devel] Migration to GitHub complete

2023-02-05 Thread Matthias Koeppe
https://github.com/sagemath/sage See https://github.com/sagemath/trac-to-github/blob/master/docs/Migration-Trac-to-Github.md for a transition guide from Trac to GitHub. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this

[sage-devel] Suggested contribution: algebraic dependendecy of numerical data

2023-02-05 Thread Georgi Guninski
Hi sage devs, I am proposing contribution to sage. Attaching https://j.ludost.net/code/algdep_numeric.py.txt >From the comments: Given a list F of numeric lists F_{i,1},F_{i,2},...F_{i,k} Finds a list of polynomials G_i, such that G_i(F_j)=0 Examples: F=[

[sage-devel] Re: Sage GSoC2023 Ideas Page

2023-02-05 Thread 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel
Hi everyone, I know things are a bit hectic with the transition right now. However, the deadline for submitting our GSoC proposal is tomorrow (at least for me). I would appreciate it if you could add a project (you don't have to agree to be a mentor) or let me know if you are willing to

[sage-devel] Re: problem building pyscipopt

2023-02-05 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Build with python 3.10 from the system? On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 9:50:31 AM UTC-8 axio...@yahoo.de wrote: > any idea what I could try? > > On Saturday, 4 February 2023 at 15:45:37 UTC+1 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > >> The real error appears farther down in the log. >> >>

[sage-devel] Re: problem building pyscipopt

2023-02-05 Thread 'Martin R' via sage-devel
any idea what I could try? On Saturday, 4 February 2023 at 15:45:37 UTC+1 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > The real error appears farther down in the log. > > src/pyscipopt/scip.c: In function '__Pyx_AddTraceback': > src/pyscipopt/scip.c:463:62: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete > type