Call me a Luddite, but let me remind you that "disputed PRs on CI" appear
to be the only way to engage in discussions where the project is heading,
and whether it is sustainable this way.
That is a noble discussion. I humbly respect that. But we should not stop
the machines, for that.
--
On 19 December 2023 21:21:13 GMT, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
>
>I would have assumed that no-one would look at a PR whose automatic tests
>were failing, since that *should* indicate that something is wrong with the
>PR.
>
>
>+++1
>
>
> My complaint is that even with a PR based on the current
I would have assumed that no-one would look at a PR whose automatic tests
were failing, since that *should* indicate that something is wrong with the
PR.
+++1
My complaint is that even with a PR based on the current develop branch,
tests are failing which are not caused by the PR.
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023, 19:44 Matthias Koeppe,
wrote:
> Meanwhile various PRs that make improvements to the CI are waiting for
> review:
> - https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36726
> - https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36694
> - https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36829
> -
Meanwhile various PRs that make improvements to the CI are waiting for
review:
- https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36726
- https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36694
- https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36829
- https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36498
On Tuesday, December 19, 2023 at
On 19 December 2023 14:49:19 GMT, John Cremona wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 14:20, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 1:54 PM John Cremona
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I am finding it impossible to get simple PRs to get past the automatic
>> testing workflow system, which are
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 14:20, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 1:54 PM John Cremona
> wrote:
> >
> > I am finding it impossible to get simple PRs to get past the automatic
> testing workflow system, which are repeatedly failing for reasons which
> have noting to do with any code
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 1:54 PM John Cremona wrote:
>
> I am finding it impossible to get simple PRs to get past the automatic
> testing workflow system, which are repeatedly failing for reasons which have
> noting to do with any code I have changed.
>
> Two current examples are
>
> -
I am finding it impossible to get simple PRs to get past the automatic
testing workflow system, which are repeatedly failing for reasons which
have noting to do with any code I have changed.
Two current examples are
- https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36786 ( a simple bugfix which I
I openen as issue
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36920
On Tuesday, December 19, 2023 at 8:41:32 PM UTC+9 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The string "sig_on_count() # check sig_on/off pairings (virtual doctest)"
> is from src/sage/doctest/sources.py line 234.
> As I understand it, the
Hi,
The string "sig_on_count() # check sig_on/off pairings (virtual doctest)"
is from src/sage/doctest/sources.py line 234.
As I understand it, the warning is caused by a bug in the method
_create_doctests() in the same file, which fails to add optional tags
correctly to the string.
Matthias
11 matches
Mail list logo
