Am Samstag, 22. November 2014 16:48:09 UTC+1 schrieb Nicolas M. Thiéry:
Conclusion:
[...]
Of course, nothing beats leading by example.
Given that a formal Code of Conduct seems to make uncomfortable some
developers for whom I have a strong respect, I am not anymore in favor
of it.
Am Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2014 11:11:34 UTC+2 schrieb Jori Mantysalo:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Ok. To have join(a,b,c,...) or join([a,b,c,...])?
Hmmm.. Well, we can have both at the same time.
True, but is it good for user perspective to have two ways to same end?
Am Donnerstag, 11. September 2014 01:36:40 UTC+2 schrieb Nils Bruin:
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:54:06 AM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote:
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:38:50 AM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote:
sage: Permutation([0,1,2])
In fact, one CAN see from this list whether the
Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014 19:54:06 UTC+2 schrieb Nils Bruin:
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:38:50 AM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote:
sage: Permutation([0,1,2])
aw shoot. The problem is there already, because we're defining
permutations by *ordered list of images* rather than as a
Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014 21:03:36 UTC+2 schrieb Nils Bruin:
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 11:51:55 AM UTC-7, Martin R wrote:
I think that's what PermutationGroup and PermutationGroupElement do.
No:
sage: PermutationGroupElement((2,3,4)).parent()
Symmetric group of order 4! as a
The ticket only adds a new feature allowing for the natural 0-based
permutations. Otherwise it does not change the current behavior.
But why shouldn't the current behaviour be deprecated? I think requiring
that the domain is 0..n-1 (is possible, with a check) would be much better.
Martin
Hi there!
Do I understand correctly, that this patch only concerns how permutations
act on matrices, and that this is defined in the matrix class?
If so, I think that I wouldn't expect standard permutations (i.e.,
permutations of 1,...,n) to work - unless of course there is a matrix class
Ack! Sorry I didn’t reply to you earlier. Needless to say it’s working
for me. I wonder if you have an old version hanging around. I presume you
restarted Emacs? What are the values of `sage-mode-version’ and
`sage-startup-before-prompt-command’? If you customized the latter, you
will
OK, great, thanks for clarifying!
Am Mittwoch, 28. Mai 2014 20:53:36 UTC+2 schrieb Simon King:
Hi Martin,
On 2014-05-28, 'Martin R' via sage-combinat-devel
sage-comb...@googlegroups.com javascript: wrote:
E.g., it should know domain and codomain, and it should know
what category it
E.g., it should know domain and codomain, and it should know
what category it belongs to. I think it makes sense to let a morphism
know whether it is injective or surjective. However, additional
information that is certainly interesting to researchers (e.g.: Was first
defined by John
Hi Ivan!
thanks for your rapid reply! I only got to the problematic computer
today. So:
%colors NoColor
works (which is wonderful!), but
https://bitbucket.org/gvol/sage-mode/downloads/sage_mode-0.11.spkg
doesn't :-(
Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
I'm sorry, I should have mentioned that I tried both sage_mode 0.10 and
https://bitbucket.org/gol/sage-mode/downloads/sage_mode-20140407.spkghttps://bitbucket.org/gvol/sage-mode/downloads/sage_mode-20140407.spkg
without
success.
In case it is of any help: I tried the %psearch within sage,
501 - 512 of 512 matches
Mail list logo
