Re: [sage-devel] vote for making nauty a standard package (Re: About license of nauty and poset generator)

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Thursday, 21 January 2016 07:16:45 UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> On 2016-01-21 00:29, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> > Surely, if the official nauty got another licence it would have solved >> > the problem easier. >>

Re: [sage-devel] vote for making nauty a standard package (Re: About license of nauty and poset generator)

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Here is a ticket with the new nauty release, and a proposal to make it a > standard package. > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19919 > > Please vote (it is already an optional package for long time, I think), and > there

Re: [sage-devel] Re: A Sage function with a good deal of GAP native code

Just to be clear what the disagreement is, as far as I can tell, this is not simply a call to GAP but a call to a GAP package "Grape" which is not part of Sage's standard installation of GAP. As a compromise: can a (possibly slower) version be written as well, which does not call an optional

Re: [sage-devel] Sage bdist changes (OSX El Capitan)

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > This is the first test of the new system for binary tarballs. Now, these > have to be made with a special script (https://github.com/vbraun/binary-pkg) > and they can only be relocated once using the new install.py

Re: [sage-devel] Sage on OS X: El Capitan

o work if you enable root > again" > Colleague: "Oh no, I don't want to do that. I guess I'll wait and se." > Me: "You can use the cloud for the time being" > Colleague: "Yes. I'll probably do that" > I agree with your colleague. I'm going to try to bui

Re: [sage-devel] Sage on OS X: El Capitan

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 6:49 PM, David Joyner <wdjoy...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:10 PM, David Joyner <wdjoy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Are those the new binaries t

Re: [sage-devel] Sage on OS X: El Capitan

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:10 PM, David Joyner <wdjoy...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Are those the new binaries that I built with SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes, or the >> previous ones? The new md5sum is: >

Re: [sage-devel] Sage on OS X: El Capitan

84a372987539a3fc4d > MD5 (sage-6.10.beta1-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.11.dmg) = > f5eba161c01c37aa0422519dd4f028d6 > I have the old one. I'll try again. > > > > On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 8:36:04 PM UTC+1, David Joyner wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:3

Re: [sage-devel] Sage on OS X: El Capitan

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Christian Nassau wrote: > On 25.10.2015 01:03, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> I've used that ticket to build relocatable OSX 10.11 binaries and uploaded >> them to http://files.sagemath.org/osx/intel/index.html. They work except you >> can't

Re: [sage-devel] Porting SageMath to Windows 64

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:58 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, October 8, 2015, David Joyner <wdjoy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Before this thread drops off the radar, I have a question. How hard >> would it be to rebuild (not

Re: [sage-devel] Porting SageMath to Windows 64

Before this thread drops off the radar, I have a question. How hard would it be to rebuild (not port) Sage starting with windows Python, then adding windows GAP, windows SIngular, networkxx, and SymPy+friends, of which GAP+Singular communicate with the Sage terminal via pexpect? Call it WinSage

Re: [sage-devel] Nauty vs SageMath speed comparisons?

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Stefan wrote: > Hi guys, > > Everybody knows nauty (and maybe traces?) is the state of the art in graph > isomorphism and canonical labeling of graphs. What I don't know (but maybe > you do?) is how far SageMath is lagging behind. Did

Re: [sage-devel] Simultaneously citing Sage and a new paper

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: I'm working on a paper where we coin a new term and implement a new algorithm. I'd like to cite Sage as an implementation, but then I have a chicken and egg problem. I'd like the code to work before we submit the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: revisions to sandpiles needs review

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:24 PM, David Perkinson dav...@reed.edu wrote: Yes, I think it will be much more efficient to address these changes all at once. I would really prefer that, if possible. I downloaded the code as a tarball and manually installed it (as opposed to using git). I didn't

Re: [sage-devel] Re: revisions to sandpiles needs review

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:31 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/trac.html#reasons-to-invalidate-tickets I think what Nathann is trying to say is that it might be good to split this up into smaller pieces. However, given the trouble you had

Re: [sage-devel] Vector weirdness: to be or not to be immutable

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Johan S. R. Nielsen santaph...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sage-devel We just crashed our heads against a bug in our code due to extremely weird semantics of Sage. Consider the following code which creates a sub-space C of the four-dimensional vector space over the

Re: [sage-coding-theory] Re: [sage-devel] Minimum distance of a Hamming code

On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, 23 May 2015 22:36:10 UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: On 23/05/15 12:53, Dima Pasechnik wrote: please review #18480 that fixes the corner case Thanks for the fix Dima. For r 5 it seems to hang

Re: [sage-devel] Minimum distance of a Hamming code

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Vincent Delecroix 20100.delecr...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, On 22/05/15 04:33, Rob Beezer wrote: The code below fails on 6.7 with a RuntimeError. r = 2 C = codes.HammingCode(r, GF(2)) C.minimum_distance() This is a bug in the algorithm since it does not

Re: [sage-devel] Re: European Horizon 2020 project OpenDreamKit accepted

I second that! Sent from Type Mail On May 19, 2015, 9:04 PM, at 9:04 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: Yes! Congratulations! We are delighted to announce that the Horizon 2020 research proposal OpenDreamKit was accepted by the European commission: opendreamkit.org

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Exterior algebras.

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:12 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry for dredging this up from the depths... So I see that http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14418 has a more explicit interface. What gets me wondering about the current state in Sage is an article in the most recent Notices

Re: [sage-devel] cartesian_product

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:59 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm unhappy that this doesn't work: sage: cartesian_product([[1,2,3], [1,2,3]]) BOOM! It seems clear from the docstring that this not working is intentional.Is anybody opposed to making the above work

Re: [sage-devel] Sage code for educational purposes only?

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:10 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: ... I think it's best to name any functionality that is is extremely slow and for educational purposes explicitly with toy somewhere in the

Re: [sage-devel] Sage is grown up; needs a last name

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:13 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sage Developers, Several people and events have suggested to me that the official name of Sage should be filled out to be SageMath, like the website url (which is sagemath.org and has been since I bought it in 2006).

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 10 year anniversary of Sage

of Sage. I made it inspired by a conversation at the 2005 JMM with David Joyner, who saw me working on my private code there. Based on that date, we could say that Sage will be 10 years old this Friday.Alternatively, it seems the first tarball I posted has the date Feb 28, 2005. [1] http

Re: [sage-devel] Re: What is Interface Issues doing in the Constructions document ?

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:08 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: The best outcome would be to have a true how do I do *** in Sage document that keeps being updated; A small remark: in combinatorial

Re: [sage-devel] Installing gap_packages on mac

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:53 AM, anurag bishnoi annu2...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to install the gap_packages in my sage installation so that I can construct the McLaughlinGraph which uses the design package of GAP. You can do this by hand: (1) Go to the GAP website (gap-system.org), (2)

Re: [sage-devel] functions for work in finite fields

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Sam Rogers samueljroger...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I'm a high school student, and I just finished doing some research with my Linear Algebra professor in Finite Field Theory. Most of my research was conducted using Sage, and my professor recommended I

Re: [sage-devel] SageMathCloud now open source

On Thursday, December 11, 2014, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, SageMathCloud is now completely open source.The complete source code is here, so if you've ever wondered how something in SMC works, you can now find out... https://github.com/sagemath/cloud There is also a

Re: [sage-devel] PyClaw

On Wednesday, December 3, 2014, Thierry Dumont tdum...@math.univ-lyon1.fr wrote: I would like to know if anybody tried to install PyClaw in Sage. http://www.clawpack.org/doc/pyclaw/ I am interested, and I propose to make an spkg. I didn't try but know people who are also interested, so

Re: [sage-devel] PyClaw

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Thierry sage-googlesu...@lma.metelu.net wrote: Hi, perhaps this does not even require maintaining a spkg, does the following work ? sage -i pip sage -pip install clawpack Didn't work for me (mac OS 10.10) but for the people I know that would be

Re: [sage-devel] PyClaw

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Thierry sage-googlesu...@lma.metelu.net wrote: Hi, perhaps this does not even require maintaining a spkg, does the following work ? sage -i pip sage -pip install clawpack This doesn't work for me using ubuntu linux and sage6.4.rc0 built from source.

Re: [sage-devel] PyClaw

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, December 3, 2014 12:09:54 PM UTC+1, David Joyner wrote: maybe having it installed on the cloud would be better anyway? It should be installed on SMC for some time now. Not sure how to to test

Re: [sage-devel] Re: What to do with sage-abuse

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:10 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:07 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: one of the questions that was raised by Thierry and not answered (there

Re: [sage-devel] discussion of sage

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:49 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: There is a somewhat depressing discussion of Sage here... http://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=14/11/13/206252 What if you ignore CirclesInSand? Sounds like a troll to me. -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 2-year project with full-time software developer for improving coding theory in Sage

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:47 PM, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: That is great news Agreed. great news! AFAIK, there is still some code from last year's GSoC which is not merged, so maybe it is a good oportunity to retake that (ticket #14973) El miércoles, 15 de octubre de 2014

Re: [sage-devel] Re: #16577: enable 0-based row/column permutation of matrices

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: I just had a quick look at it, and the following looks downright scary: It is one of this code's many wonders. Also, note that : sage: Permutation([1,2,3]) [1, 2, 3] sage: Permutation((1,2,3)) [2, 3, 1] I hate

Re: [sage-devel] Re: #16577: enable 0-based row/column permutation of matrices

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Viviane Pons vivianep...@gmail.com wrote: The Permutation0 might be a good idea, I don't know... It wouldn't change the tuple vs. list thing which is used to distinguish between the cycle notation and the word notation. I agree some of the syntax could be

Re: [sage-devel] Groups in Sage

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: Hello guys ! If anybody asks you whether Sage supports groups, here is an answer : sage: AG=cartesian_product([CyclicPermutationGroup(5),CyclicPermutationGroup(4),CyclicPermutationGroup(4)]) Is this a confusion

Re: [sage-devel] Groups in Sage

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: Yo !! Is this a confusion over categories, Nathann? Or natural stupidity, your choice. sage: G1 = CyclicPermutationGroup(5) sage: G2 = CyclicPermutationGroup(4) sage: D1 =

[sage-devel] new Sage special interest group in coding theory

topics, and other coding-theory patches. It will be likely be a low traffic group. Please join if you are interested! - David Joyner -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-devel group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [sage-devel] A digital non-deterministic random bit generator

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:22 PM, mknight@gmail.com wrote: is available here www.tag.md/public/ While this looks spammy, it seems to be an implementation of Nash's algorithm from 1955 (recently declassified, http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/press_room/2012/nash_exhibit.shtml). I thought

Re: [sage-devel] boxen files almost all gone?!

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote: all what is left on http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/ is Index of /home The discussion has been on sagemath-us...@googlegroups.com. Do you subscribe? [ICO] NameLast modified SizeDescription [DIR]

Re: [sage-devel] Who won the Spies Prize?

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:35 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: http://youtu.be/I9Myt5NTeCc Congrats, Volker! -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-devel] Document

This post is spam and was deleted. On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Hari Krishna Malladi harikrishnamalladi.i...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Did you receive the list of items which I have sent earlier? I have re-uploaded them on my Google drive. Click Here, Everything you need is in there..

Re: [sage-devel] bug with FinitelyGeneratedMatrixGroup (worked with previous version)

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Ben Cote cote...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to get sage to list the elements of a (finite) finitely generated matrix group. It works in version 5.9 installed on a Mac, but not on 6.1.1 on linux or on the cloud, which leads me to believe somewhere between

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Reproducibility in CS

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote: Hi! On 2014-03-19, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: --=_Part_2984_18125917.1395194931633 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Not directly about math, but definitely relevant to the open source community...

Re: [sage-devel] class LinearRecurrence

Have you looked at what SymPy has already (it is included in Sage)? On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Ralf Stephan gtrw...@gmail.com wrote: Please make your comments on the design while it's baking. http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15714 Regards, Ralf Stephan -- You received this message

Re: [sage-devel] Re: AMS/MAA Joint Mathematics Meeting

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:27 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 7:24:19 PM UTC-5, William wrote: Hi, There is going to be Sage / SageMathCloud booth at the Joint Mathematics Meetings in Baltimore next week. Like last year, I'm planning to be there *most*

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Review needed for some combinatorial constructions

On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 6:22:27 AM UTC-5, Nathann Cohen wrote: Hellooo everybody !!! I send this email because I want to add new stuff to our combinat/designs/ folder, and I really need some help to review patches. These are constructions of combinatorial designs, i.e. SOoo

[sage-devel] Re: Review needed for some combinatorial constructions

On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 6:22:27 AM UTC-5, Nathann Cohen wrote: Hellooo everybody !!! I send this email because I want to add new stuff to our combinat/designs/ folder, and I really need some help to review patches. These are constructions of combinatorial designs, i.e. SOoo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-trac] #15107: Projective Plane designs

On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: Hell ! Hi Nathann, The trac seems to be down for me, so I write here. What you propose is a misnaming of the object, akin to, say, creation of a Sage function that returns for given n the next prime power,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-trac] #15107: Projective Plane designs

On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: I meant #15521, not #15482. And I meant claims something different from what it returns, not from what it claims. Nathann Nathann: At the risk of being punch in the face by trying to mediate this slugfest, ducks

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-trac] #15107: Projective Plane designs

? An argument over semantics isn't worth it when you can get the syntax you want. You have won! And don't forget it is almost Happy New Year! On 4 Jan 2014 21:50, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: I meant

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-trac] #15107: Projective Plane designs

On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Dima! Nathann: Please relax, calm down and except this as a peace offering from Dima. Okay? An argument over semantics isn't worth it when you can get the syntax you want. You have won! O_o What the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-trac] #15107: Projective Plane designs

On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: Helloo !! ... Nathann, all that is left is to make a small change to the ticket to add the default argument type = Pappian or type = Desarguesian, say. Does this seem reasonable Nathann? Does it seem

Re: [sage-devel] Reviewing package version updates (in particular, gap)

On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: The current process of updating third-party packages is broken: a) There isn't really anything to review beyond running it on the buildbot b) Nobody dares to press the positive review button c) Frustation to see your

Re: [sage-devel] About groups.tab, designs.tab, and the brand-new codes.tab

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: Hellooo everybody ! I just created ticket that adds a new codes.tab object to Sage gathering all codes that Sage can build, the same way that we already have such objects for groups/graphs/designs/matroids and

Re: [sage-devel] About groups.tab, designs.tab, and the brand-new codes.tab

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 4:11 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Now, how about plot.tab ? :-) (1) plot is already a specific command

Re: [sage-devel] OS X Mavericks

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:07 PM, R. Andrew Ohana andrew.oh...@gmail.com wrote: I've uploaded a binary to http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/ohanar/builds/sage-5.13.beta3-x86_64-Darwin.dmg -- no promises it will work for you. This worked for me. Thank you! On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:51

Re: [sage-devel] *PAID FOR* Sagemath Cloud that quarantees minimal quality of service a money maker

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Chris Seberino cseber...@gmail.com wrote: Paid for Sagemath Cloud sounds like a win for everyone. Most of my student run Windows and Macs and many have trouble installing Sage.. Paid for Sagemath Cloud will be attractive to avoid installing but still have

Re: [sage-devel] Sage package name convention

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Thomas Feulner thomas.feul...@uni-bayreuth.de wrote: I have produced a new Sage package (http://www.algorithm.uni-bayreuth.de/de/team/Feulner_Thomas/codecan-1_0_spkg.zip) which applies to Sage 5.11. Now, for the current version 5.12 of Sage the source code

Re: [sage-devel] Optional spkg databases scheduled for deletion

On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: There are a number of optional databases without or with incomplete SPKG.txt. If nobody knows the copyright status of the following optional spkgs then they will have to be deleted: cunningham_tables

Re: [sage-devel] Re: aut codes patch

On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Thomas Feulner thomas.feul...@uni-bayreuth.de wrote: Thanks for all your help. @Volker: You are right, the names are terrible. I will change them. There is no need to have LinearCode_AutGroupCanLabel in the global namespace. I think LinearCode should have a

Re: [sage-devel] Jon Hanke (Georgia) contact info

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: Hello, I want to contact Jon Hanke from UGA (Georgia) concerning the buildbot machine rosemary.math.uga.edu. He doesn't seem to respond to the email address I found on

Re: [sage-devel] Re: aut codes patch

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Thomas Feulner thomas.feul...@uni-bayreuth.de wrote: The last post to this thread is 2 years old, but I have continued my work on canonical forms for linear codes. I have followed up Dima`s proposal and prepared a package, which is entirely written in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: aut codes patch

for a standard package. For you have a paper or webpage that explains all the functionality or your package? Thanks again, David On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:04 AM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Thomas Feulner thomas.feul...@uni-bayreuth.de wrote: The last post

Re: [sage-devel] Re: How can we improve 3d graphics in sage?

I wonder if https://github.com/nilesjohnson/sage_animate could be expanded upon? On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: Matplotlib doesn't have real 3d, only isometric projection. Often good enough, but nothing where you can really rotate the scene. My

Re: [sage-devel] Magma

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:44 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:07 AM, XXX wrote: Hi William, I know you have had a long and interesting history with Magma. You're probably already aware of this but if you're not, apparently the Simons Foundation is now

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Products of permutations use nonstandard order of operation

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2013 4:43:09 PM UTC-7, darijgrinberg wrote: Is this too barbarous a solution? Is the problem not much of a problem? Thanks for bringing this off Trac and to the wider audience. Some thoughts.

Re: [sage-devel] Jenks Prize

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:48 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, According to Victor Miller [1], Sage one the Jenks Prize [2] last Great news! Thanks William for putting all this together in the first place! night. Congrats to us Sage developers! [1]

Re: [sage-devel] The 2013 Spies Prize winner is...

Congrats Jeroen! On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 2:48 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Jeroen Demeyer has provided excellent service to the Sage community as release manager, starting with Version 4.6.1 in January 2011, just five months after his first code contribution. He has continued to

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: use Sage!

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:41 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: ... I think a review process, editorial board, and useful reviews/rankings on Amazon.com are starting to matter more to people than it's published by Springer (or O'Reilly). These are things we can accomplish together,

Re: [sage-devel] Huge patch on Trac 7477: Matroid theory

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote: Dear sage-devel, ... So I would be in favor of accepting this en masse if it had a knowledgeable review for fitting into Sage, as Nathann and Volcker propose. I also hope +1 .. Rob -- You received this

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] use Sage!

Hi WIlliam: I'm curious, is there any further progress on this plan of a Use Sage! series at Springer? - David On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:27 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sage-Developers, There is a big series of small books about R that Springer publishes:

Re: [sage-devel] Huge patch on Trac 7477: Matroid theory

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Stefan van Zwam stefanvanz...@gmail.comwrote: Dear Sage developers, Over the past two years I've been working with several people on bringing Matroid Theory to Sage. We wanted this to be research-level code that will remain relevant for a long time, so we

Re: [sage-devel] Is it OK to add a module intended for teaching?

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14288 provides a module for teaching the simplex method, i.e. you should NOT use it routinely to just get solutions of optimization problems. Dima has pointed out

Re: [sage-devel] Please test this if you have OS X 10.8

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:53 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! Thanks to very hard work by Ivan Andrus, we have Sage double-clicking sws files on Mac. We just need one more test to make it complete. If you DO have OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion but have NOT ever made something that makes

Re: [sage-devel] Fix busted sage -valgrind

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@lri.fr wrote: On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:59:21PM -0500, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:46:24PM +, John Cremona wrote: On 6 February 2013 22:02, Minh Nguyen mvngu.n...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Michael, On

Re: [sage-devel] Testing new MPIR and zn_poly on Mac OS X.

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, Could someone try to build the new MPIR from http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13137 and build zn_poly on top of it (especially the make check target). It is included in 5.7.b0 and I can't get sage

Re: [sage-devel] Testing new MPIR and zn_poly on Mac OS X.

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: On 2013-01-25 12:02, David Joyner wrote: Does that mean something is still wrong? Yes, this bug hasn't been fixed. The bug is non-deterministic, try building again. But it seems that the new MPIR somehow made

Re: [sage-devel] Testing new MPIR and zn_poly on Mac OS X.

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: On 2013-01-25 12:21, David Joyner wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: On 2013-01-25 12:02, David Joyner wrote: Does that mean something is still wrong? Yes

Re: [sage-devel] Defining Clifford Algebras

I am not sure but I think Clifford Algebras are implemented in SymPy, which is included with Sage. On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Dox o.castillo.felis...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I've asked in asksage how to define a Clifford Algebra. Benjaminfjones has suggested I start by looking at the

Re: [sage-devel] Groups and ParentWithGens vs. Parent

On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 4:58 PM, David Roe roed.m...@gmail.com wrote: I haven't tried, but I fully support moving it to the new-style Parent. David +1 On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: Right now sage.groups.group.Group class (base for all groups)

Re: [sage-devel] am using ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS version...which version of sage is compatible? pls help...

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Prasun pras...@gmail.com wrote: am using ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS version...which version of sage is compatible? pls help... 64 bit binaries are here: http://mirror.clibre.uqam.ca/sage/linux/64bit/index.html 32 bit binaries are here:

Re: [sage-devel] Scholarship mention at documentation

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Raniere Gaia Silva r.gaia...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I search in the developer reference but can't find how property mention a scholarship. How can I do it? Can I use - person, scholarship (date in ISO year-month-day format): short desc Maybe I am

Re: [sage-devel] Scholarship mention at documentation

described in the first link, that will be okay. Sage itself does not have an institute but if you attended any of the Sage Days to do your work, you may want to reference that and where it was held. Raniere On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:32 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 9

Re: [sage-devel] LibGAP spkg vote!

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: LibGAP (the C library interface to GAP) is finally usable and ready to be released into the wild! We will ship it as a separate spkg since ... Per the usual rules, new spkgs need a vote so now is your chance to be

Re: [sage-devel] Invariant theory

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: I need some classical invariant theory and didn't find the formulae in Sage, so I'm adding it. My plan is to have a single invariant_theory factory object in the global namespace: sage: R.x,y,z = QQ[] sage:

Re: [sage-devel] Automorphisms of Matrices Under Row/Column Permutations

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:17 AM, samgonshaw samgons...@gmail.com wrote: Hey all, I'm trying to implement an algorithm of Alexander Kasprzyk improving the capabilities of PALP's normal form algorithm for lattice polytopes. The procedure uses ideas of finding permutations of rows and columns of

Re: [sage-devel] Adding Quantum Coding Theory

I don't know anything about QEC but this sounds like a welcomed addition. You would need a track account and a developer who would review your work. I guess you would add your new module in the sage/coding directory. On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:36 AM, fabiol fabiol...@gmail.com wrote: - This is my

Re: [sage-devel] Please test sage-5.1.rc1

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: Because many of the Sage testing machines (redhawk and all of Skynet) are down, version sage-5.1.rc1 has been tested much less than usual. So, please build sage-5.1.rc1 and report unexpected problems, especially if

Re: [sage-devel] Please test sage-5.1.rc1

On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote: Hi David, On 7 July 2012 12:53, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: Because many of the Sage testing machines (redhawk and all of Skynet

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hi / Stores From America --- SPAM!!!

Yes, definitely spam. My fault for approving the membership but i got no email moderating the post. How did that email get through? I thought first posts were moderated. On Tuesday, July 3, 2012, Dima Pasechnik wrote: -- To post to this group, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] new computer - any special Lion instructions?

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:11 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: So although my 3-year-old MacBook Pro with Snow Leopard on it works fine, due to warranty issues my employer is basically forcing me to get a new machine.  (I won't be paying for it, or I'd say no - I love this little guy.)

Re: [sage-devel] Gap packages

On Saturday, June 2, 2012, mmarco wrote: If the maintainers of the gap_packages spkg agree, i would propose to include in it as many gap packages as possible. We could email the authors of the packages asking them for permission to distribute them under the GPL and include all the packages

Re: [sage-devel] Sage (tm)

On Friday, June 1, 2012, William Stein wrote: On Friday, June 1, 2012, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'mich...@orlitzky.com'); wrote: On 06/01/12 02:05, Martin Albrecht wrote: Secondly, it shouldn't be a problem but to verify: having a trademark on the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Gap packages

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:44 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 May 2012 22:15, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:10 PM, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: I have contacted the author of the kbmag package (which has no copyright note at all), and he

Re: [sage-devel] Gap packages

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:50 AM, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: One of the complains i have heard from my colleagues that use sage (and i have noticed myself) is the lack of certain gap packages in the sage distribution.  There is an spkg with some of them, but most are missing. Also, it is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Gap packages

packages. On May 29, 12:54 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:50 AM, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: One of the complains i have heard from my colleagues that use sage (and i have noticed myself) is the lack of certain gap packages in the sage

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in gap_packages-4.4.12.p1 (was: [GAP Forum] problem with AutomorphismGroup)

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote: An author to GAP's package braid suggests to switch to an officially GAP-supported package mapclass, which offers a superset of the functionality. Should we do this? I vote yes. (I assume the license is the same.)

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >