On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:23:51 +0200
Hikari Boulders hikari.bould...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
about 4ti2: is there some master-plan to make sage more modular or
smaller?
Moore's law does mostly take care of this, but unless I
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.comwrote:
(hate new google groups...)
I think you may be able to make a link from /dev/shm to /run/shm
That seems to be mostly an issue if you use Debian or Debian based distro
since they are following the HFS standard - see
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:35 AM, pang pablo.ang...@uam.es wrote:
sudo rm -rf /dev/shm sudo **ln -s /run/shm /dev/shm
It really looked promising, but unfortunately, it didn't work: is a reboot
necessary?
Eh, it depends: What went wrong?
Cheers,
Michael
--
You received this message
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Cannot OS X run a VM?
Sure, but Sage does have a native 32 bit as well as 64 bit OSX port,
so aside from the lag of supporting a new OSX major release there
never is the need for one. Or did I just not get your
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
One clarification regarding credit for #6042: I shouldn't get reviewer
credit for it. David rebased and reviewed all of it himself.
Fixed.
Best,
Alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Hi Brian,
no need to CC me on bug reports you send to sage-devel.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:45 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Your comment about the sum function suggests to me that something
similar might be behind the weird thing I reported yesterday.
Yeah, we ought to suggest to the pari people to rename such generic
function. Even with
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:55 AM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Will 4.0.a0 be released sometime today? (I'm leaving early tomorrow morning
for SD15 and may not get internet access quickly when I arrive.)
Well, my main goal is to get ecl into 4.0.a0. Since the status meeting
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:57 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/14 Michael Abshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:45 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Your comment about the sum function suggests to me that something
similar might
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
Hmm, two possibilities:
(a) This is a 32 bit issue, but since William tested that code on OSX
I doubt it.
(b) You have multiple heads, so please check. Maybe otherwise there
is also junk laying around for you
On Mar 30, 7:29 am, Ryan Hinton iob...@email.com wrote:
Michael,
I'm not entirely sure of the protocol for giving credit, but M.Albrecht
also helped with #5519 and #5535, and C.Witty looked over my patch for
#5535.
Thanks!
- Ryan
Ok, when I understand you correctly the credits for
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
SNIP
Hi Ondrej,
If building openmx really benefits from make -j you might consider
putting something clever in spkg-install to detect available cores and
maybe build using them...
Yes, but I need this for all
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:50 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
checking the number of available CPUs... 1
checking the number of available CPUs... 1
checking for x86 cpuid 0x0 output... unknown
checking for the processor vendor... Unknown
262144
32768
second level name
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:40 AM, mathieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
An attenpt to install sage 3.1.1 has failed on a linux
system:
Linux mammitum 2.6.25.5-1.1-pae #1 SMP 2008-06-07 01:55:22 +0200 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
CPUinfo gives:
processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:40 AM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:38 AM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What happened in the nanosecond between releases 3.0.4 and 3.0.5? I'm
wondering whether to bother building the latter having just done the
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:57 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 28, 4:45 pm, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
On Jun 28, 2:10 pm, Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
What is the policy on breaking backward compatibility of pickling at
major
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Francois,
I just found out that I have xmaxima in my $SAGE_LOCAL/bin folder.
I am pretty sure no one ordered that. It seems that it will build by
default
if the configure script finds tk. Actually I had a look at the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:41 AM, IzI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Iztok,
I humbly apologize for bothering you with such a trivial problem, the
libc6-dev package was missing on my installation.
No problem and don't worry about it since everybody around here has had
something very similar go
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:27 PM, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:19 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
[...]
No clue. Can you actually compare the gp binary from Sage directly
with the timings from your self
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jun 7, 3:12 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops, pressed return by accident.
This is 3.0.3.alpha1 and it was never meant to see the light of day
since I wanted to use it internally to test rebuild on
종현 정 wrote:
Dear Jong Hyun Jung,
Dear whom it may concern,
I am writing about a bug report on plot_vector_field.
**
* OS Name: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
o Version: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build 2600
o Processor: x86 Family 6 Model
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Dave,
I've got a bit further with building sage-3.0.3.alpha1. After a few
hacks to ntl and flint, I got problems when building polybori
It is a known issue - see below.
1) One of the problems
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since I have errors building polybori, and its a known issue which I
don't think I will be able to fix (not knowing C++), is there a way to
try to build Sage without this? Even if there is no chance of it
working, it
eduardo wrote:
Hi Michael! thanks for the answer!
Hi Eduardo,
please stay on list since I see an insane amount of email volume, so a
private email from somebody I do not know tends to slip through the
cracks.
On Jun 4, 5:23 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Jun
Eduardo Ocampo wrote:
hhmm,
Hi Eduardo,
once more: Please stay *only on the list*, i.e. do not email me privately.
let me see : m4, lbstdc++6, gcc (apt-get says that there's no 4.2
version of gcc available so I have de 4.1) and g++. For the others I
had already the latest version.
I
Jonathan wrote:
Hi,
Since no one else has responded, I'll go ahead and say that I don't know
anything about this. Maybe this email will be a reminder to someone who
does know. (Or maybe any questions have already been taken care of off
list?)
I did have a chat with rlm about the
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Franco Saliola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Michael,
Hi Franco,
Here is a reply to your OS X 10.4 questions (I have to boot into
Ubuntu to answer your other questions).
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:00 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OS 2: Mac
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 7:51 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sage Devel,
This looks like a good thing.
Yep. Maybe we should just subscribe the update email to sage-announce? That
sounds like the easiest and simplest solution since no one needs to remember
to email them ;)
SNIP
Yep. Maybe we should just subscribe the update email to sage-announce?
That
sounds like the easiest and simplest solution since no one needs to
remember
to email them ;)
Great idea. Please do that.
Done.
William
Cheers,
Michael
On May 16, 1:50 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael (cc: sage-devel and bcc: some sponsors),
Feel free to forward since there is no BCC in Google groups ;)
What's the quick status on:
* OS X 64-bit porting
Cleaning up patches. One crash issue related to libSingular's
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:43 AM, root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Troy,
SNIP
Hi Tim,
That does look like an interesting program. It's possible that many
scientists would be interested in it.
Has someone already packaged it in an rpm that you know of?
Hi Troy,
Sage has a fairly
Hi,
we are listing major features for Sage 3.0.1 at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-3.0.1
Currently we would like you to add some text, i.e. a couple sentences,
describing what is new/changed/improved so that someone who is not a
specialist can understand what was added.
Convex Hulls And
[CC to sage-devel - this email somehow didn't make it on first try :(]
Hi guys,
When I apply both patches from #2755 to my 3.0.1.rc0 merge tree I get
the following failure in totallyreal_rel.py:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/totallyreal_rel.py
Harald Schilly wrote:
On May 2, 3:19 am, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Looks good to me. I think Python is actually in the top 5 languages
now, isn't it?
just for completeness, released today:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/10065
- Readers' Choice Awards 2008 /
John Cremona wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the explanations!
For my own build, I recovered by doing sage -ba as previously
reported. So I don't know whether the original problem (running sage
for the first time after an apparently successful build) was caused by
the SAGE_PBUILD thing or not.
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to go ahead and open a ticket for it with a patch for spkg-
install.
I noticed that the CXXFLAGS needed a bit of spring cleaning as well.
The ticket is #3079.
I noticed and saw the CXXFLAGS issue. That puzzles me
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Timothy G Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I attempted to build the 3.0.1alpha1 packages for Debian, but it doesn't
build, apparently due to some type errors. The build log is attached --
I'd appreciate any guesses as to what's going on here.
-Tim
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:57 PM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 4:49 pm, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that the timeit short-cut seems more broken than normal (at
least I think this worked previous to 2.10.2:
sage: R.x=ZZ[]
sage:
gri6507 wrote:
I think the issue was that I was running on a system which had a
relocated sage v2.9.3 prior to a relocated sage v2.10.1 (current
version) and the location of the matplotlibrc file changed between the
two sage version. All I did was remove the ~/.matplotlib and the
~/.sage
Carl Witty wrote:
SNIP
With the help of alfredo on IRC (who had the same problem), I was able
to track down this problem. The error message is:
rijndael.c: In function 'do_padlock':
rijndael.c:2062: error: cant find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS'
while reloading 'asm
and the fix
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tom,
I'm developing a new cython class, and I currently have it print a message
to tell me when it gets deallocated.
When I instantiate the class in a function, __dealloc__ gets called -- but
if I instantiate at the commandline and don't capture the reference,
Brian Lauber wrote:
Hi Michael.
Hi Brian,
I was looking at the Trac page for SAGE and noticed that
you are doing a little work with SELinux. I'm actually planning on
building some custom SELinux policies for SAGE in the next two weeks,
and I don't want to step on your toes in the process.
William Stein wrote:
Steve (cc: sage-devel),
Any chance you would have any time to port GAP to Itanium, as described
in your email below? So far, I failed to find anybody to do this so
far (is there
anybody out there on sage-devel who is C programmer who can manage
a few lines of in-line
Martin Rubey wrote:
Michael Abshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
[somehow Martin's reply didn't make it onto sage-devel (yet)]
* licensing issues need to be sorted out since the APL2 is not
GPL-compatible. I don't know if it'd even be possible to distribute
Aldor
as part of Sage.
Yep
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
On 11/30/2007 03:13 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
Hi Dan,
I've been spending a bit of time with symmetric functions recently.
In the near future, I'll be making a commit that adds support for
Hall-Littlewood, Macdonald polynomials, and quasisymmetric functions.
Other stuff
Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
Mike, could you point me to your code?
I've attached the _very_ rough version I started awhile back. It just
does FormalPowerSeries and DataStream.
I actually wonder why you would
reprogram it in Sage and not interfacing the aldor-combinat library?
Is
Klas Heggemann wrote:
On 15 nov 2007, at 16.45, Michael Abshoff wrote:
However the build does not seem to be functional:
sgray:sage-2.8.12./sage
--
| SAGE Version 2.8.12, Release Date:
2007-11-06
Klas Heggemann wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi Klas,
mmh, I remember fixing that. Maybe it snuck back in or Bill has fixed
it upstream only.
I will open a ticket for this in a minute or two so it doesn't get lost.
Either way I will check this out on my Sun 10 box. Last time I checked
I got
Hello folks,
the following might be of some interested to us, maybe a little project
for Bug Day 5:
Original Message
Subject: New mpn_get_str and mpn_set_str
From:Torbjorn Granlund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Mon, October 29, 2007
William Stein wrote:
On 9/28/07, Eliz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still can't build flint-0.2.p3.spkg.
Looking at your first message, I just realized that
you are building using
gcc version 4.3.0 20070531 (experimental)
This is the unstable active development version of GCC.
And quite
didier deshommes wrote:
2007/9/25, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sep 24, 10:42 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/24/07, didier deshommes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some build notes:
- Singular needs -lcurses whenever -lreadline is specified.
Using
it from the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Hello Michael,
I just want to mention, that the size of the compiled PolyBoRi
libraries is dependend on build settings.
On our 64-BIT compute server, it is less than 6 MB.
Can you elaborate when and how much of boost is needed for the build? I
would also be
[This is CC to the google group sage-devel]
Hello clisp folks,
the Sage people are currently trying to make Sage run on Solaris in 32 bit
mode. That involves a working clisp to make Maxima work.
We compile clisp without optimization and without libsigsev. Everything
builds fine, but lisp.run
Michael Abshoff wrote:
[This is CC to the google group sage-devel]
Hello clisp folks,
the Sage people are currently trying to make Sage run on Solaris in 32 bit
mode. That involves a working clisp to make Maxima work.
We compile clisp without optimization and without libsigsev. Everything
Bill Hart wrote:
Hello,
To possibly add to the sage.math woes yesterday, I was testing a new
memory manager just before the slowdown. It had the unusual property
of allocating very many gigabytes of swap space in small chunks and
very little actual memory. My presumption was that the
William Stein wrote:
Hello,
On 8/13/07, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tried rsyncing htdocs to my mirror today and the file system on
sage.math is very slow (hours+ to rsync a 120MB file and still waiting
on that one). One oddity I came across is this one process:
rlmill8598
William Stein wrote:
SNIP
Hello,
I'll wait for the answers to the above questions. I would be fine
with including
scons in SAGE. I think it's already in one of the optional packages
(I can't remember
for sure though). It's just a little python program, after all.
It would take an
William Stein wrote:
On 7/17/07, Georges Khaznadar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I would like to make a Debian package of Sage.
I recently attended a talk of Professor Tsai who uses it in Taiwan, and
it was pretty convincing.
Apparently, Sage depends on other software which should be
Ondrej Certik wrote:
While solution (1) is against the Debian Way (2) is next to impossible
from a debugging standpoint, i.e. which version of libSingular, g++ and
clisp are you using? I don't think anybody intends to get Sage into the
official Debian distribution because maintaining a
Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hello,
current stable release on a whim, so I think getting Sage into Ubuntu
is
a
much more reachable goal. It also seems that Ubuntu is getting a lot
more
mindshare in the *desktop* these days (compared to Debian unstable).
I meant Debian *stable* in the end,
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
SAGE does take a very long time to build, especially on slower
hardware. How many hours do you think is has been running? There
could be a circular build issue (especially with such high make
numbers) but I've never encountered it.
autoconf is run for each of the
David Joyner wrote:
Hi:
Some SD4 photos at posted at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/sd4photos/images.html,
or at least they will be in 5 minutes or so.
- David
Sorry, but
You don't have permission to access /home/wdj/sd4photos/STA70416.JPG on
this server.
(and probably others)
William Stein wrote:
Michael,
William,
I put an ampersand at the end of this file:
/Applications/Sage-2.5.app/Contents/MacOS/Sage-2.5
and now the jumping goes away.
Great.
I think the best way to build the SAGE OS X app is to
literally build it in place in that subdirectory
William Stein wrote:
SNIP
This appears to be a GPL'd Hungarian project that hasn't been updated
in almost 4 years.
While that seems to be true for the website at the University of Szeged,
the sourceforge site is still active:
Posted By: kovzol
Date: 2006-07-25 23:22
Summary: WMI 1.0.2 has
Gregory Vanuxem wrote:
Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 11:38 -0700, mabshoff a écrit :
SNIP
I am using a bash 3.2 instead of the standard 3.0
SNIP
Going back to bash 3.0 fixes it. I will file a bug at the Maxima bug-
tracker.
And I am forwarding this mail to the Maxima mailing list.
Joel B. Mohler wrote:
x[0] should do the trick (as it is equivalent to *x in C) and is the
recommended way in the Pyrex documentation. But I used the deref trick
so
far.
Yep, you said that in the slides in your SD3 talk. I didn't understand
the
point when I read the slides, but now
Martin Albrecht wrote:
Hi,
I have appended my original source of information, maybe you find this
helpful.
Thanks for the info. Should this be added to general SAGE documentation? I
am sure once I am though/working on the code I will have additional
suggestions.
Also, (even more
67 matches
Mail list logo
