Re: [sage-devel] Re: 2011 Spies Sage Development Prize

2011-07-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote: On 18 Jul., 22:52, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: The 2011 recipient of the Spies Sage Development Prize (http://www.sagemath.org/development-prize.html) goes to Robert Bradshaw. Congratulations, Robert! A

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Maarten Derickx m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com wrote: [...] What would be the advantage of having it in the SPKG itself? That it wil be compatible with parallel building as mentioned earlier. Like if you want to install two packages that overwrite the same file?

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-11 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Maarten Derickx m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com wrote: On May 10, 9:10 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:. It just occurred to me, that it should be possible to keep the current SPKG format, and implement uninstall. One just needs to keep track of all

Re: [sage-devel] Re: DAE solver on Sage, Python wrapper for SUNDIALS

2011-05-11 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Guilherme guito...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ondrej, Will you create some spkg packages for the codes above? If so, I'd be interested in it too, and I can test them. Once I learn how to do a spkg I will be pleased to do so. I'm reading the docs... As I mentioned

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-10 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: [...] I was thinking about this a lot yesterday, and there are a lot

Re: [sage-devel] DAE solver on Sage, Python wrapper for SUNDIALS

2011-05-10 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Guilherme, On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Guilherme guito...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, A quick followup on the subject of finding a Python wrapper for SUNDIALS. Good news is that there are a few projects that did it already. I will short review what I found. 1) python-sundials

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-10 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO the list of installed files is an integral piece of package management and should explicitly be part of the spkg. Automatically generating it is not an option during parallel compilation. There should be a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw rober

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw [...] What about dependencies (e.g. if the version of Cython was updated, would all the stuff depending on Cython get re-compiled? No. Only the other way round -- if you want

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ondrej Certik ond

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: [...] I was thinking about this a lot yesterday, and there are a lot more issues to resolve, than it seems at first sight. In particular

[sage-devel] reason for -i switch in the python package

2011-05-07 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, The python's spkg-install package contains the following -i switch in make install: # the -i is crucial, esp. in the case of a major upgrade make -i install Does anyone know why this is crucial? It seems to me that it ignores (silences) real errors, and it bit me today (when it did silence

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-06 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: [...] Were I to design the system from scratch, I'd put all our code (devel/scripts/...) in a single repo, along with the top-level files, and a list of dependencies (spkgs). Building sage would fetch (locally

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-06 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: [...] Were I to design the system from scratch, I'd put all our code (devel/scripts/...) in a single repo, along with the top-level files

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage gentoo prefix

2011-05-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:49 AM, dagss d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On Thursday, May 5, 2011 3:42:59 AM UTC+2, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:51 AM, dagss d.s.se...@astro.uio.no wrote: I don't really have a say in this, but I've given this a lot of thought since I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage gentoo prefix

2011-05-04 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:51 AM, dagss d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: I don't really have a say in this, but I've given this a lot of thought since I decided to drop Sage as my scientific Python distribution a year ago and have been searching for a new one ever since. Just curious --- why

Re: Fwd: [sympy] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference

2011-04-07 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:13 AM, mario mario.pern...@gmail.com wrote: From: Mateusz Paprocki In case people are curious, Sage (because of Singular!) takes 0.07 seconds to do the benchmark that Sympy takes 11 seconds to do at the end of the Sympy talk:    

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference

2011-04-06 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:45 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- [...] Hi all, sorry for the massive cross-post, but since all these projects were highlighted with talks at

Fwd: [sympy] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference

2011-04-06 Thread Ondrej Certik
, On 6 April 2011 14:37, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:45 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- [...] Hi all, sorry for the massive cross

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Summer of Code

2011-03-24 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:37 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, March 19, 2011 7:31:21 AM UTC+1, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Why has a decision been made not to make a GSoC application? There

[sage-devel] experience with mongodb

2011-02-01 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi William and others, what is your experience of using mongodb for storing (calculated?) results about elliptic curves? When googling a bit, I found some commits like: http://code.google.com/p/purplesage/source/detail?r=2ebfec09070b4a9a549c2a51e8e9dcde9a832925# I am thinking how to best store

Re: [sage-devel] experience with mongodb

2011-02-01 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:07 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: Hi William and others, what is your experience of using mongodb for storing (calculated?) results about elliptic curves? When googling a bit, I found

Re: [sage-devel] Re: code refereeing and code.google.com

2010-10-28 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:36 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote: On 27 Okt., 09:56, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: On 2010-10-27 09:36, Robert Bradshaw wrote: The larger problem with the current system is not that it's hard to comment on a single line, but it's way to much

Re: [sage-devel] code refereeing and code.google.com

2010-10-27 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:54 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I just spent the day working on code with some people, and using http://code.google.com with multiple cloned repositories and their code review system, which allows excellent line by line annotation, allows much

Re: [sage-devel] All of sage as a python library

2010-10-27 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:44 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, When I started Sage I viewed it as a distribution of a bunch of math software, and Python as just the interpreter language I happen to use at the time.  I didn't even know if using Python as the language would last.  

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Is it *really* necessary for everyone to download fortran.spkg ?

2010-10-27 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:36 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: downloading Xcode or installing it is a little annoying, but fairly straightforward even for newbies, because Apple wants to make it easy for

[sage-devel] Re: [debian-sage] Sympy version 0.6.7: issues with upgrading?

2010-10-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:22 AM, cjfsyntropy c...@cjfearnley.com wrote: Sage currently ships v. 0.6.4 of sympy (http://www.sagemath.org/packages/standard/sympy-0.6.4.p0.txt). I found the hint below in another thread.  But what are the issues with upgrading sympy to v. 0.6.7?  I could not

[sage-devel] Re: [debian-sage] building a Sage package on Debian

2010-10-04 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM, CJ Fearnley c...@cjfearnley.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:04:22PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: Hi CJ, thanks for bringing this issue up again and for the summary. Il 01/10/2010 02:22, CJ Fearnley ha scritto:    * Scipy 0.6.7, which is in sid

Re: [sage-devel] Re: changing SAGE_LOCAL/SAGE_ROOT to SPKG_LOCAL/SPKG_ROOT

2010-09-30 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Alexander Dreyer alexander.dre...@itwm.fraunhofer.de wrote: Hi, This is just my opinion, but isn't the name SPKG (SAGE package) already quite specialised? indeed, more generic would be something like PKG_ROOT, etc. But since spkg seems to be established as

Re: [sage-devel] experiment with a new version of the SageTeX package

2010-09-27 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote: On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 at 09:31PM -0700, Ondrej Certik wrote: Are there any plans to integrate this with sphinx? Here is an example (go to the very end of the page): http://theoretical-physics.net/dev/src/math/feynman

[sage-devel] changing SAGE_LOCAL/SAGE_ROOT to SPKG_LOCAL/SPKG_ROOT

2010-09-27 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, in Femhub (http://femhub.org) I wrote a new buildsystem from scratch using Python, so far it's a simple Python script: http://github.com/hpfem/femhub/blob/master/spkg/base/femhub-run and it is (so far) fully compatible with Sage in the sense that any Sage package (should) install in Femhub

Re: [sage-devel] experiment with a new version of the SageTeX package

2010-09-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Dan! On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote: Hello, I've been working on a new version of SageTeX and I'd like some feedback. There are two major changes: [...] Please test, report, and comment on anything above. Thanks! Are there any plans to integrate this

Re: [sage-devel] g95 - can we simply forget it exists?

2010-09-11 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Dave, On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: There's odd bits code scattered around in Sage that do tests for g95, which is an old Fortran 95 compiler that in any modern Linux or Unix systems. According to Wikipedia

Re: [sage-devel] g95 - can we simply forget it exists?

2010-09-11 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote: On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz  wrote: When building femhub and packages for femhub, I have to deal with these fortran issues as well. And

Re: [sage-devel] g95 - can we simply forget it exists?

2010-09-11 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote: On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz  wrote: When building femhub

Re: [sage-devel] g95 - can we simply forget it exists?

2010-09-11 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote: +1 to move to FC. I raised this back in November 2009 - William is against using FC. http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-devel@googlegroups.com/msg31854.html I read

Re: [sage-devel] Re: g95 - can we simply forget it exists?

2010-09-11 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:29 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any reason whatsoever to have g95 code in ATLAS, given we don't build ATLAS on OS X? No opinion - this sounds fine, but is beyond my knowledge. One more question about Mac --- how do you install gcc in there?

Re: [sage-devel] Re: BSD licensed bignum library

2010-09-08 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: I suppose another point of relevance is that there is a slight possibility that it could also be used in Python for the native Python

Re: [sage-devel] A Mathematica parser for Sage.

2010-09-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:55 AM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've Yes: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/d9824f455407ee23 Ondrej -- To post to this group, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Python, Sage, categories

2010-07-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:05 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, During the last few weeks I've spent time optimizing code, among other things.  A surprising number of random things I look at in Sage are too slow by a factor of 10-100, usually due to programming style.    One way

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Univ of Washington postdoc job(s)

2010-07-21 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:52 PM, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote: Here are some postdocs, some in computational science and parallel computing. https://jobs.llnl.gov/psc/jobs/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/s/WEBLIB_LL.VIEW_JOBS_LL.FieldFormula.IScript_View_Jobs_LL?TITLE=JOB_CAT=PD; The one that was called to my

[sage-devel] how to publish a book at lulu

2010-07-20 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, here I put some technical info about how to publish your own book at lulu.com: http://ondrejcertik.blogspot.com/2010/07/theoretical-physics-reference-book.html Overall it cost me $20 and I am now having the physical hardcover book in my hands. Ondrej -- To post to this group, send an

Re: [sage-devel] Re: IDE's; science/engineering

2010-07-20 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:43 AM, dagss da...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote: On Jul 11, 12:20 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: 2. Sage at EuroScipy: Another thing -- though most talks mention Cython, not one single talk given about actual engineers/scientists doing work even mentioned

Re: [sage-devel] About mpmath and sympy

2010-07-19 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote:   Hi,   Newer sympy has a bundled copy of mpmath, what causes several problems in my sagemath package. I was in vacation during most of Mandriva 2010.1 freeze, and did not fully test the package for some time,

Re: [sage-devel] About mpmath and sympy

2010-07-19 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:01 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote:   Hi,   Newer sympy has a bundled copy of mpmath, what causes several

Re: [sage-devel] Univ of Washington postdoc job(s)

2010-07-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:16 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sage-Devel, Amazingly, University of Washington has = 1 postdoc jobs starting in 2011.  It's a very competitive position, and pays pretty well. Anyway, here is the job ad:            

Re: [cython-users] Re: [sage-devel] Cython cpu time

2010-07-15 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: Thanks for this. Btw, I just revived this cython based line profiler: http://github.com/certik/line_profiler Is Robert K not maintaining

Re: [cython-users] Re: [sage-devel] Cython cpu time

2010-07-15 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: I hope he is. I haven't seen any patches since 2009-03-13 and it segfaulted my code, but I fixed it and sent him the patches. (I pulled his repo

Re: [sage-devel] Cython cpu time

2010-07-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: Hello all, I just solved a relatively easy riddle, and I thought I'd share the results: # Cython version of cputime(): cdef extern from time.h:    ctypedef unsigned long clock_t    cdef clock_t clock()    cdef enum:  

Re: [sage-notebook] Re: [sage-devel] Re: IDE's; science/engineering

2010-07-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:57 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote: [...] The problem I see now regarding scientific computing, is the not so seamless integration of numpy-scipy: do you think SAGE may improve numpy

[sage-devel] permission to relicense wigner.py

2010-07-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, about a year ago I got a permission from Jens (CCed) who wrote the file: http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/tip/sage/functions/wigner.py to use his (original) code in SymPy and license it as BSD. We just got more people interested in that, so we'd like to port it now. So I thought I

Re: [sage-devel] IDE's; science/engineering

2010-07-11 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:20 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, 1. IDE's There are a number of IDEs that can be used for Python development:   * Spyder (free, cross platform) -- http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/   * Eric (free, cross platform) --

[sage-devel] python based buildsystem

2010-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, for FEMhub (http://femhub.org/) got rid of the Sage buildsystem completely and wrote a simple 414 lines Python script that does the same (that we need -- for Sage more stuff would have to be ported). I talk a little bit about it here:

Re: [sage-devel] matplotlib is reading old system headers, in preference to Sage ones.

2010-06-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: When matplot lib builds on 't2', it says: BUILDING MATPLOTLIB            matplotlib: 0.99.1                python: 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Jun  5 2010, 17:43:53)  [GCC                        4.4.1]              

Re: [sage-devel] Standalone SageNotebook

2010-06-08 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Bill Page wrote: Once upon a time there was http://code.google.com/p/spdproject/ Source Python Distribution (SPD) is a Python distribution and many optional (mainly scientific)

Re: [sage-devel] Re: vote on moving Sage's IRC channel over to #sagemath

2010-06-08 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote: On 2010-Jun-07 10:12:33 +0200, Fredrik Johansson fredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote: I've heard good things about OFTC. I'll second that.  Myself and a couple of friends have been monitoring a channel on OFTC for the last

[sage-devel] Re: [sympy] Re: ANN: mpmath 0.15 released

2010-06-07 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Fredrik Johansson fredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: Will it be possible to also use it outside of Sage? E.g. I guess if you do setup.py install in mpmath, that it would compile the Cython

[sage-devel] Re: ANN: mpmath 0.15 released

2010-06-06 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Fredrik Johansson fredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Version 0.15 of mpmath is now available on the website: http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/ It can also be downloaded from the Python Package Index: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mpmath/0.15 Mpmath is

Re: [sage-devel] Sage prerequisites (bzip2)

2010-06-04 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:21 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:44 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: Hi, we

[sage-devel] Sage prerequisites (bzip2)

2010-06-03 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, we are revisiting prerequisites for FEMhub (currently based on the Sage system) and we are thinking of doing the following changes: * make Python a build dependency (Python will still be built and used as the python in FEMhub) * make bzip2 a build dependency (I checked and it seems to be on

Re: [sage-devel] Sage prerequisites (bzip2)

2010-06-03 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:44 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: Hi, we are revisiting prerequisites for FEMhub (currently based on the Sage system) and we are thinking of doing the following changes: * make

[sage-devel] matlab on the phone

2010-06-01 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, just found a video of a Matlab running in the phone: http://www.mathworks.com/mobile/videos.html for inspiration... Ondrej -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For

Re: [sage-devel] Re: matlab on the phone

2010-06-01 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:21 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote: On 1 Jun., 17:45, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: Hi, just found a video of a Matlab running in the phone: http://www.mathworks.com/mobile/videos.html Actually only an iPhone app. (Regarding the thread title I

Re: [sage-devel] 4.4.1 accessing internet during compilation

2010-05-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote: On May 4, 5:08 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: I was bitten by this too in FEMhub. setuptools simply sometimes want to download things from the net. Is there some way to disable it? I want the build to just fail, if I

Re: [sage-notebook] Re: [sage-devel] 4.4.1 accessing internet during compilation

2010-05-04 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:59 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol t...@timdumol.com wrote: This isn't related to my new package includes. Jinja2 wasn't one of those new packages. The problem is that SageNB is installed before Jinja2 is

Re: [sage-devel] policy question about spkg's

2010-04-21 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:55 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:49 AM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote: According to our documentation, the src directory in an spkg should contain the vanilla upstream code.  I've seen a few spkg's that modify

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.6 port

2010-04-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Craig! On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote: I can see now: === python-2.6.4.p4 (Craig Citro, Jan 17, 2010) === * Move MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET fix to sage-env, so that it's   used for all python-related spkgs. (This was leading to a   build issue with

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.6 port

2010-04-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:37 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:35 AM, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:14 AM, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com wrote: But even simple tests are failing with:: jdh2...@bsd:~

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.6 port

2010-04-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ondrej, Let me know if you have any hints what to try. For sage, the issue was that Python was getting built with MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET set to 10.4, which is no longer valid in 10.6. This was leading to some

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.6 port

2010-04-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ondrej, Let me know if you have any hints what to try. For sage, the issue was that Python was getting built with MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET set

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.6 port

2010-04-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
bsd users:    I made 100GB free in /scratch, so please use /scratch on bsd.math.  -- William Thanks, that really helps. I reduced my home dir to 62MB. Ondrej -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OS X 10.6 port

2010-04-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ondrej, Let me know if you have any hints what to try. For sage

Re: [sage-devel] Re: proposal: standard command-line options in Sage

2010-04-08 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 19, 2:29 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 19, 11:13 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu

Re: [sage-devel] Re: proposal: standard command-line options in Sage

2010-04-08 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Apr 8, 2010, at 8:59 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote: In the most recent patch, it does this: 1. The file SAGE_ROOT/sage calls

Re: [sage-devel] Re: triangulation editor based on the graph editor

2010-03-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Pablo! On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Pablo Angulo pablo.ang...@uam.es wrote: 1) I have updated the content at http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/pangulo/etc/te.zip with some corrections. It is still not recommended for installation, just for reading. 2) I have left a server in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: new version of the graph editor

2010-03-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Pablo Angulo pablo.ang...@uam.es wrote: I've noticed that the graph editor is viewable in published worksheets. Should this behaviour be disabled? Why? It's confusing. It looks like you can edit the page while you really can't. It'd better if the

Re: [sage-devel] triangulation editor based on the graph editor

2010-03-24 Thread Ondrej Certik
the linear system of PDEs  * plot it Do you have some example worksheet doing this? That's the exact same workflow that we want to use in FEMhub --- only we want to use our C++ PDE solvers (http://hpfem.org/), that we wrapped in Python. By the way, Ondrej Certik just mentioned he's using Flex to work

Re: [sage-devel] Re: triangulation editor based on the graph editor

2010-03-24 Thread Ondrej Certik
directly with femhub (http://femhub.org), so I guess they would use the same license as femhub, which uses the same license as Sage, e.g. GPL. By the way, Ondrej Certik just mentioned he's using Flex to work in a mesh editor: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/c26290

Re: [sage-devel] new version of the graph editor

2010-03-23 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Rado, On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Rado rki...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to Kevin (one of William's undergrad students), we have some major improvements to the graph editor. Take it for spin at http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~rkirov2/js-graph-editor/ (a Sage patch will follow soon). I have

Re: [sage-devel] Annual Spies Prize Winner Announced!

2010-03-22 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: Congrats Minh, thanks for all your persistence hard work! Congrats! Ondrej -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: atan2 throws divide by zero

2010-03-22 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:47 PM, G B g.c.b.at.w...@gmail.com wrote: Burcin-- Now that I've managed to divide the discussion between two groups, I should try to help organize the mess I made. Ondrej mentioned in the sage-support discussion that he's opened ticket 8564.  Unfortunately I don't

[sage-devel] Re: presentation at Jr. Science and Humanities Symposium in Reno

2010-03-19 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: Hi, at 6pm today we'll be giving a presentation about FEMhub[0] at the 2010 Northern California Western Nevada Jr. Science and Humanities Symposium[1, 2]. I'll talk about sympy as part of it for about 10 minutes

Re: [sage-devel] improvements to FEMhub with regards to Sage

2010-03-19 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi William! On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:34 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/2/22 Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz: Hi, some FEMhub users are confused by seeing the name Sage in warnings and error messages, and in various installation scripts and messages. They are there because

Re: [sage-devel] atan2 throws divide by zero

2010-03-19 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:41 PM, G B g.c.b.at.w...@gmail.com wrote: I raised this in sage-support, and am now reasonably convinced this is a bug.  Guidelines say the next step is to raise it here.  The full thread is at:

[sage-devel] help with I and NumberFieldElement_quadratic

2010-03-19 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, I am having problems understanding how I (complex unit) in Sage: sage: type(I) type 'sage.symbolic.expression.Expression' somehow becomes a NumberFieldElement_quadratic and that fails to convert to the sympy's I: ond...@raven:~/repos/sympy(pu)$ MPMATH_NOSAGE=yes sage -python bin/test

Re: [sage-devel] Moving _sig_on/_sig_off from Sage to Cython

2010-03-10 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Brian Granger wrote: Hello all, In the older Cython docs here: http://modular.math.washington.edu/home/was/www/home/gfurnish/old/sage-3.0.6/doc/prog/node55.html The _sig_on

Re: [sage-devel] Moving _sig_on/_sig_off from Sage to Cython

2010-03-10 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com wrote: Ondrej, On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Brian Granger

Re: [sage-devel] fractals in sage

2010-03-02 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: William Stein wrote: Hi, A student of mine is going to add to sage the capability of plotting lots and lots of fractals easily.  E.g.,   sage: fractals.[tab]   lots of stuff   sage:

Re: [sage-devel] Is CMake OK for a standard spkg?

2010-02-28 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:36 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune bjarke.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Can a standard spkg in Sage use CMake?  http://www.cmake.org/ I ask because I'm seriously considering moving from a straight make

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Should there be some *good* examples on notebook?

2010-02-24 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: Oscar Lazo wrote: On 23 feb, 10:39, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: If one sets up a Sage server for public use, there is the opportunity for someone to publish worksheets, there is a section:

[sage-devel] improvements to FEMhub with regards to Sage

2010-02-22 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, some FEMhub users are confused by seeing the name Sage in warnings and error messages, and in various installation scripts and messages. They are there because FEMhub uses some functionality of Sage (as Ubuntu uses some functionality of Debian). However, the word Debian does not appear in

Re: [sage-devel] ReST - notebook converter

2010-02-19 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:        Hi! Does anyone have a ReST - notebook converter even crude? For my talk on Tuesday, I'd like to go through the Category primer, inside the notebook. Could you post here your ReST document? I am

[sage-devel] Fwd: [femhub] Re: adjusting versions and using/abusing FEMHUB

2010-02-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
Forwarding to sage-devel. Ethan made petsc working with FEMhub (so it should work in Sage too). Ondrej -- Forwarded message -- From: Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz Date: Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:06 PM Subject: Re: [femhub] Re: adjusting versions and using/abusing FEMHUB To: fem

[sage-devel] Re: [femhub] Re: adjusting versions and using/abusing FEMHUB

2010-02-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Ethan Coon etc2...@columbia.edu wrote: Ok, so I uploaded an spkg, but it's not exactly right yet.  A few issues: 1. my stupidity -- the flag should actually be --FLIBS=f95 , not --FFLAGS=-lf95*.  This isn't necessary to get a working PETSc and petsc4py, but

Re: [sage-devel] calling sage from external c / cython code

2010-02-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote: Hi, I'm in Kaiserslautern, at a workshop on connecting mathematical software for polyhedral geometry with software packages for Gröbner basis (polymake, gfan, singular). I tried to code a small example demonstrating how

[sage-devel] sympy gamma notebook updates

2010-02-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, just wanted to give a brief status update. I improved the pyjamas version of the notebook here: http://gamma.sympy.org/nb/ it now shows the evaluate button, adding new cells work, joining cells work. Click on the About to get the sourcecode (BSD licensed). Compared to the current Sage

[sage-devel] Re: sympy gamma notebook updates

2010-02-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: [...] * only tested in firefox and chromium in Linux. In opera (on linux), shift+enter and backspace (when deleting cells) behaves funny, for some reason, preventDefault (event) doesn't work in Opera. I didn't test on IE8

Re: [sage-devel] Cadabra interface

2010-02-08 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Feb 7, 2010, at 7:56 AM, Oscar Gerardo Lazo Arjona wrote: I am studying quantum mechanics for the first time, and I would love to have some software dedicated to solving quantum mechanics problems to make

Re: [sage-devel] thesis and talk about Sage

2009-12-11 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, I have uploaded my BSc Honours thesis [1] to the Sage website. You can also find my thesis at my website [2]. The Sage publications [3] page has also been updated accordingly. It took me months to prepare the

[sage-devel] Re: sage: An error occurred while installing python_gnutls-1.1.4.p6

2009-11-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Sameer regm...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks William and Ondrej. I tried sudo too but still the same problem. I also tried to build Sage itself and I get another error: make[6]: Leaving directory `/home/sameer/all/sage-4.2/spkg/build/

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >