Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make pytest, pytest_mock, pytest_xdist + dependencies standard packages

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:08:20AM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > On Friday, May 31, 2024 at 9:38:30 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > frankly, I don't see anything new here. > > > There does not have to be anything new. > The proposal stands on its own merit. Haven't it been discussed

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal (redo): Make pytest, pytest_mock, pytest_xdist + dependencies standard packages

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 01:04:38PM -0400, David Roe wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:38 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:25 PM Matthias Koeppe > > wrote: > > > > > > We added the packages as optional "pip" packages (see > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project)

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:03:29AM -0700, Marc Culler wrote: > On Thursday, April 25, 2024 at 8:28:48 AM UTC-5 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Essential components of sagelib such as GAP, Singular, don't run on > native Windows > > > I was amused to find the following statement on the GAP forum >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project)

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 08:09:48AM -0700, Marc Culler wrote: > The GAP project provides a native Windows installer > . > > So, evidently, it is possible to build GAP for Windows. They do not seem > to provide

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:28:13AM -0700, 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel wrote: > I just figured out that the installation from source (even with the > explicit configure option `--with-system-singular`) on an up to date arch > linux machine ignores the installed singular (`pacman -Q singular`

Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals

t appears that the call to characteristic() which causes a crash is a leftover which can simply be removed. https://github.com/dimpase/sage/pull/6 (not yet a PR to the Sage repo, just want to see results of tests) Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sag

Re: [sage-devel] SEGV caused by CTL-C in C/C++ code probably related to signals

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:27:15AM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote: > Giving short testcase, can someone else reproduce it? > Also attaching backtrace. yes, I can reproduce this on a recent 10.4.beta - the backtrace I get it more or less the same as the one attached - and it's in an unexpected to me

Re: [sage-devel] Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 04:23:13PM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > On Wednesday, April 10, 2024 at 3:25:16 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:10 PM Matthias Koeppe > wrote: > > On Wednesday, April 10, 2024 at 2:40:18 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > There is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Follow NEP 29: Recommended Python version

On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 06:34:25AM -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Thanks, Tobias, for opening this vote thread. Here on sage-devel, this is a > much better setting than what you attempted > in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35404#issuecomment-1504474945 > > I am voting NO. > > There's

Re: [sage-devel] Why SR('expression') fail on some but not others?

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:08:02PM -0700, 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-devel wrote: > I read integrals from a file. They all are stored as strings. > > Then use SR('expression') inside sagemath to convert them to sagemath > symbolic expression before calling integrate. > > Some give parsing

Re: [sage-devel] Colours

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Georgi Guninski wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 4:08 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > gmail still supports application passwords, so one can still bypass 2FA for > > sending/receiving mail to/from gmail. > > > > my previous message in this thread was

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Colours

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 03:15:03AM -0800, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > Again. Sorry. I think this happens if you use Google's interface to Groups, rather than an email client. Posting using an email client (set to send in text mode - but probably not necessarily) should be enough to avoid this. Dima

Re: [sage-devel] Unable to build sage

On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:44:59PM -0700, Daniel Bump wrote: > > > On Saturday, July 4, 2020 at 3:12:36 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > I guess this is due to gfortran 10. > > We still do not support gcc 10, I think. > > Can you downgrade it to gfortran 9? > > > > I had gfortran10 which

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Could someone point me to the code that supports math on symbolic equations?

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:07:47PM -0700, Jonathan wrote: > Emmanuel, > > Thanks, that is one of the places I was starting. It turns out that doesn't > quite pick up the necessary stuff from the `Expr` type. I have had better > luck extending the base type `Expr`. It was not hard to get the

[sage-devel] Fwd: error at installing sage: Error installing package zlib-1.2.11.p0

On Friday, April 3, 2020 at 8:11:38 AM UTC+8, Alejandra Kandus wrote: > > Hello, I am quite new at using sage, I tried to install the last version > of sage in my notebook. It runs linux 18.04 and is 32 bts. The error > message was: "Error installing package zlib-1.2.11.p0". Did anyone of you

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Cryptography Interactions

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 08:19:01AM -0700, Carson Kurtz wrote: > I am currently a student working with a professor at a partner university > to help improve the cryptography resources on Sage. Earlier in August of > 2019, her and a colleague developed some Sage interactions that could help >

Re: [sage-devel] Different behavior in normal usage and when building the doc (decimal separator / tachyon syntax error)

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:37:25PM +0100, Jean-Florent Raymond wrote: > > I have been investigating a bug that happened when I tried to build the > documentation of sage 9.0 on a new machine. > It seems to be the same as described in > >

Re: [sage-devel] Integrals don't coincide with the ones directly done by maxima

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:36:59AM -0700, mmarco wrote: > I am trying to pinpoint the following bug: > > sage: integral(sqrt(1+cos(x)^2),x) > -1/24*sin(3*x) + 1/8*sin(x) > > > which is incorrect. One would think that maxima is returning a wrong > answer, but if we ask directly to maxima, it

Re: [sage-devel] The future of the Mac Application on Mojave

Hi Ivan, thanks for looking into this. On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:25:53PM -0700, Ivan Andrus wrote: > I haven't worked on Sage for quite a while, but it was brought to my > attention (thanks Karl-Dieter), that the Mac application no longer works on > Mojave. I believe this has to do with the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: internet tests failing

On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 06:05:35AM -0700, kcrisman wrote: > This is all very helpful. Hopefully I'll not miss if there is a beta or rc > version of Sage implementing this - if I fix this with the script now, I > won't be able to test "vanilla"-ish Sage. well, to break it back it suffices to

Re: [sage-devel] how to log sage output for long running program

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:21:48PM -0700, 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel wrote: > > > On Mar 15, 2019, at 21:46 , Ai Bo wrote: > > > > I am running a long running program. I would like to log the output. > > I have tried: > > ../sage-8.6/sage test.sage > test.log & > > > > There is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Computing determinants of obviously singular matrices

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 02:59:05PM -0700, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > If the determinant is obviously zero, then you don't need to run the > computation. If a preprocessing to check zero rows or columns is added, > then the determinant computation would become slower for usual nontrivial > cases.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 07:12:29AM -0800, kcrisman wrote: > > > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/repl/sage/repl/ipython_kernel/interact.html > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/prep/Quickstarts/Interact.html > > > > > Thanks; I knew about the second one, since I wrote it :-) but the

Re: [sage-devel] check dependencies

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Thierry wrote: > Hi, > > on the way to upgrading networkx, i noticed that the source code contains > tests, but we do not ship any spkg-check script for that (yet). > > However, the check process requires nose, which is an optional package > (note that

[sage-devel] Re: SageNB -> Jupyter conversion needs testers

> http://localhost:/?token=4b2b23550be648f42c955b4dfe2f8ab6890553699fb8b386 >>> [I 16:07:48.266 NotebookApp] Use Control-C to stop this server and shut >>> down all kernels (twice to skip confirmation). >>> [C 16:07:48.267 NotebookApp] >>> >&g

[sage-devel] Re: SageNB -> Jupyter conversion needs testers

it does not work for me, or at least I must be doing something wrong. I get to the page listing the notebooks to convert, and then, if I click on a notebook, I get a weird page asking for a password or a token. Password or token: Log in Token authentication is enabled. You need to open the

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-edu] Re: Sage-enabled textbook for Abstract Algebra

On Wednesday, 5 August 2015 00:20:02 UTC+1, Rob Beezer wrote: On Sunday, August 2, 2015 at 1:12:29 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: One thing I didn't like was the inability to hide the contents frame(?) on the left-hand side. It just sits there for no good reason, and is a distraction.