Re: [sage-devel] [ 1 = 1+0i ] <=> [ 1 = 1 ]

2022-05-27 Thread Nils Bruin
On Friday, 27 May 2022 at 01:26:55 UTC+2 hohoa...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi there, > > > Are you asking whether a shell script can handle complex arithmetic? > What does that have to do with Sage? > Maybe it's just wishful thinking. One day, SageMath may have it's own > shell (smiley) > > A shell

Re: [sage-devel] [ 1 = 1+0i ] <=> [ 1 = 1 ]

2022-05-26 Thread ph h
Hi there, > Are you asking whether a shell script can handle complex arithmetic? What does that have to do with Sage? Maybe it's just wishful thinking. One day, SageMath may have it's own shell (smiley) > If that's not what you're asking, please clarify. Maybe just another wishful thinking, how

Re: [sage-devel] [ 1 = 1+0i ] <=> [ 1 = 1 ]

2022-05-25 Thread John H Palmieri
Are you asking whether a shell script can handle complex arithmetic? What does that have to do with Sage? If that's not what you're asking, please clarify. On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 5:38:43 AM UTC-7 hohoa...@gmail.com wrote: > P.S: Sorry, there was a typo here: > *# at configuration time.*

Re: [sage-devel] [ 1 = 1+0i ] <=> [ 1 = 1 ]

2022-05-25 Thread ph h
P.S: Sorry, there was a typo here: *# at configuration time.* should read *# at validating time.* On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 10:14 PM ph h wrote: > Dear All, > > Is this feasible [ 1 = 1+0i ] <=> [ 1 = 1 ] ? > > Regards, > > phiho > > ** > if [ 1 = 1+0i ]; then > # Make sure that SAGE_ROOT is

[sage-devel] [ 1 = 1+0i ] <=> [ 1 = 1 ]

2022-05-24 Thread ph h
Dear All, Is this feasible [ 1 = 1+0i ] <=> [ 1 = 1 ] ? Regards, phiho ** if [ 1 = 1+0i ]; then # Make sure that SAGE_ROOT is either an absolute physical directory name # or empty. *# An absolute physical directory name has already been embedded and exported* *# at configuration