Re: [sage-devel] Meson Build System

2023-10-25 Thread tobia...@gmx.de
Awesome! I've continued working on it over at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36524, which uses meson to compile parts of sagelib. It seems to work fine so far and I didn't encounter any real trouble. Everything ranging from some cursory remarks to a full-fledged code review (of the

Re: [sage-devel] Meson Build System

2023-10-23 Thread Volker Weißmann
If you need help, I'm available and very familiar with meson. On 21.10.23 05:24, tobia...@gmx.de wrote: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36489 now implements a basic meson setup that replaces autoconf for sage library. Given the complexities mentioned above, I've restricted attention to

Re: [sage-devel] Meson Build System

2023-10-20 Thread tobia...@gmx.de
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36489 now implements a basic meson setup that replaces autoconf for sage library. Given the complexities mentioned above, I've restricted attention to when all the dependencies are provided via conda, which reduced the problem to something manageable.

Re: [sage-devel] Meson Build System

2023-05-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 10:35 -0700, Volker Weißmann wrote: > Hello, > > I'm a developer that worked quite a bit with the meson build system and > looked at sagemath for a few days. I thought that redoing the build > system with meson instead of autoconf would be quite a bit of work, but >

[sage-devel] Meson Build System

2023-05-02 Thread Volker Weißmann
Hello, I'm a developer that worked quite a bit with the meson build system and looked at sagemath for a few days. I thought that redoing the build system with meson instead of autoconf would be quite a bit of work, but would 1. Be far, far more readable. 2. Result in far faster incremental