Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

2023-02-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023, 16:29 Matthias Koeppe, wrote: > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:09:15 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > There is no reason for "real" github accounts to be marked as mannequins. > > No, you are mistaken. > > An org can only create issues & comments in the name of its

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

2023-02-04 Thread John Cremona
Nathan Cohen stopped contributing to Sage definitively around the time William started SageMathCloud (now cocalc) as he thought that William was profiting from his work. I couldn't find any posts from him since 2013. John On Sat, 4 Feb 2023, 16:29 Matthias Koeppe, wrote: > On Saturday,

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

2023-02-04 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:09:15 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: There is no reason for "real" github accounts to be marked as mannequins. No, you are mistaken. An org can only create issues & comments in the name of its members, not arbitrary GitHub users. Which is why the invites had

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

2023-02-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 12:22 PM Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > 2) GitHub nathanncohen is a real GitHub account, not a mannequin - and > it corresponds to Trac's ncohen just fine. > > Perhaps he didn't respond to the recent invitation. There is no reason for "real" github accounts to be marked as

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

2023-02-04 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 4:22:55 AM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote: 2) GitHub nathanncohen is a real GitHub account, not a mannequin - and it corresponds to Trac's ncohen just fine. Perhaps he didn't respond to the recent invitation. That's correct – one of many outstanding invitations -

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

2023-02-04 Thread David Joyner
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 7:22 AM Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > 2) GitHub nathanncohen is a real GitHub account, not a mannequin - and > it corresponds to Trac's ncohen just fine. > > Perhaps he didn't respond to the recent invitation. > Dima would know better than I, but my guess is that Nathann Cohen

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

2023-02-04 Thread Kwankyu Lee
2) GitHub nathanncohen is a real GitHub account, not a mannequin - and it corresponds to Trac's ncohen just fine. Perhaps he didn't respond to the recent invitation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

2023-02-04 Thread Kwankyu Lee
It seems it's still being updated. On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:44:49 PM UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > 1) there is something funny with search - it it because it's still not > done? > > > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues?q=is%3Aissue+strongly+regular+is%3Aopen > > gives > > 5

Re: [sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

2023-02-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
1) there is something funny with search - it it because it's still not done? https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues?q=is%3Aissue+strongly+regular+is%3Aopen gives 5 Open 71 Closed No results matched your search. so there are 5 open issues, but they are not shown. (searching

[sage-devel] Migrated repo ready for review on GitHub.com

2023-02-04 Thread Matthias Koeppe
The first preview is now available at https://github.com/sagemath/sage (it is "archived", i.e., read-only). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to