Re: [sage-devel] Re: Cython errors when building p_group_cohomology

2023-11-15 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2023-11-16 00:51:12, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > This package produces mathematically incorrect results, as was shown > on a trac ticket a couple of years ago, and no movement then. Demote > to experimental? There's not much distinction at this point, but if we're going by the "builds on supported

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Cython errors when building p_group_cohomology

2023-11-15 Thread Dima Pasechnik
This package produces mathematically incorrect results, as was shown on a trac ticket a couple of years ago, and no movement then. Demote to experimental? On 15 November 2023 23:57:07 GMT, Matthias Koeppe wrote: >This will need an adjustment for namespace packages, see

[sage-devel] Re: Cython errors when building p_group_cohomology

2023-11-15 Thread Matthias Koeppe
This will need an adjustment for namespace packages, see https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/efuM_ruoOEk/m/UZ1QTohVEQAJ On Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 3:49:04 PM UTC-8 Marc Culler wrote: > I am not able to build the optional package p_group_cohomology in 10.2.rc2 > due to cython