[sage-devel] Re: How to modularize for fun and profit, II: MONOREPO vs. MULTIREPO

2021-11-21 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 5:17:33 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > - Even for separate git repositories hosted in the SageMath GitHub > organization (https://github.com/sagemath/), code ownership and review > workflow are unclear. > - For example,

[sage-devel] Re: How to modularize for fun and profit, II: MONOREPO vs. MULTIREPO

2021-10-14 Thread tobia...@gmx.de
I think the discussion and the initial post mixes a few things that are not really related to the question of mono- vs multi-repo. In particular, the question of how to continue with trac is somewhat orthogonal (you can easily have a monorepo on github or multiple trac repos). In the end, it

[sage-devel] Re: How to modularize for fun and profit, II: MONOREPO vs. MULTIREPO

2021-10-12 Thread Nathan Dunfield
On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 7:17:33 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > *Recommendation:* Keep MONOREPO for all distributions that fill the > sage.PAC.KAGE.MODULE namespace (= distribution packages named *sagemath-... > *-- according to my recommendation in part I). > > *Recommendation: *For