On 23/04/2018 19:35, Marc Mezzarobba wrote:
John Cremona wrote:
This is simpler than writing numerator and denominator as a rational
times a primitive integral polynomial, though that is probably what
users would prefer.
And (at least in my limited experience), for rational fractions over
John Cremona wrote:
> This is simpler than writing numerator and denominator as a rational
> times a primitive integral polynomial, though that is probably what
> users would prefer.
And (at least in my limited experience), for rational fractions over
general fraction fields (things like
Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> This is discussed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16993
...and https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16268 (needs review!).
--
Marc
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
This is discussed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16993
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 9:39:36 PM UTC+2, dhr wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Reduction of rational functions seems not to work in specific cases.
> In the following output,
>
> ===
> sage: R.=QQ[]
> sage: (2*t+2)/(2*t)
> (2*t +
