[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread David Joyner
There was a problem with the installation on an amd64 ubuntu 8.10: ... building 'sage.libs.ntl.ntl_ZZ' extension creating build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.5/sage/libs/ntl gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fPIC

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 26, 12:56 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was a problem with the installation on an amd64 ubuntu 8.10: ... building 'sage.libs.ntl.ntl_ZZ' extension creating build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.5/sage/libs/ntl gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 26, 1:36 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 26, 12:56 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was a problem with the installation on an amd64 ubuntu 8.10: ... building 'sage.libs.ntl.ntl_ZZ' extension creating build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.5/sage/libs/ntl

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: Hello folks, here goes 3.2.1.alpha2. This one should actually build out of the box. alpha1 I hope? Else I'm not keeping up pace! Various setup.py issues have been fixed and the Magma doctests should now all pass. In addition performance improvements to homespace and

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 26, 2:04 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mabshoff wrote: Hello folks, here goes 3.2.1.alpha2. This one should actually build out of the box. alpha1 I hope? Else I'm not keeping up pace! Well, since I screwed up alpha1 there will be an alpha2 tonight. ERROR installing

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: On Nov 26, 2:04 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mabshoff wrote: Hi Michael, Hello folks, here goes 3.2.1.alpha2. This one should actually build out of the box. alpha1 I hope? Else I'm not keeping up pace! Well, since I screwed up alpha1 there will be an

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 26, 2:30 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mabshoff wrote: On Nov 26, 2:04 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mabshoff wrote: Hi Michael, hi Jaap, Hello folks, here goes 3.2.1.alpha2. This one should actually build out of the box. alpha1 I hope? Else I'm not

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mabshoff wrote: Hello folks, here goes 3.2.1.alpha2. This one should actually build out of the box. alpha1 I hope? Else I'm not keeping up pace! Various setup.py issues have been fixed and the Magma doctests should now

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread mabshoff
One more thing: Before doctesting run hg update -C on the local/bin repo due to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scratch/mabshoff/release-cycle/sage-3.2.1.alpha2/local/ bin$ hg sta ! ipy_profile_sage.py I cought that on the way out, but my manual fix in the scripts spkg was insufficient. I know the fix and

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread Jaap Spies
William Stein wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ith exit status 1 sage: There was an error installing modified sage library code. I might have a fix (not 100% tested yet, but I'm pretty confident). Apply the patch at

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread Jaap Spies
William Stein wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mabshoff wrote: Hello folks, here goes 3.2.1.alpha2. This one should actually build out of the box. alpha1 I hope? Else I'm not keeping up pace! Various setup.py issues have been fixed and the Magma

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 26, 6:32 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SNIP The following tests failed:         sage -t  devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py Mmmh, M2 installed? Maybe a 32 vs. 64 bit thing for the toy implementation?         sage -t  

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: On Nov 26, 6:32 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SNIP The following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py Mmmh, M2 installed? Maybe a 32 vs. 64 bit thing for the toy implementation? M2 installed, yes.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread John H Palmieri
On Intel Mac OS X.5: after jumping through all of the appropriate hoops to make this version, sage -testall -long had four failures, two of which are familiar: 1. #3758 sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py 2. #3760 sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 26, 7:38 pm, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John, On Intel Mac OS X.5: after jumping through all of the appropriate hoops to make this version, :) sage -testall -long had four failures, two of which are familiar: 1. #3758 sage -t -long

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha1 released

2008-11-26 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:38 PM, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Intel Mac OS X.5: after jumping through all of the appropriate hoops to make this version, sage -testall -long had four failures, two of which are familiar: 1. #3758 sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py