Ok, thanks again. Using the construction parameters is definitely an option
and I will change it soon.
Am Mittwoch, 30. Oktober 2019 22:59:34 UTC+1 schrieb Nils Bruin:
>
> On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 2:31:37 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Kliem wrote:
>>
>> Basically, I can just do it like this. Now,
On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 2:31:37 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Kliem wrote:
>
> Basically, I can just do it like this. Now, if I understand it correctly:
>
> Face lattice as it is, should not be cached. Instead its probably fine to
> store the version with indices and convert on each call. Or the
Thanks. I think I have it figured out now.
The current construction passes to the face lattice the ID of self as a
key. This is why F1 and F2 are not identical.
Basically, I can just do it like this. Now, if I understand it correctly:
Face lattice as it is, should not be cached. Instead its
I haven't dug very deep into this, but the following looks suspicious:
sage: o1 = lattice_polytope.cross_polytope(3)
sage: o2 = lattice_polytope.cross_polytope(3)
sage: o1==o2
True
sage: o1 is o2
False
This in itself isn't a problem, but o1.face_lattice() is a
UniqueRepresentation object. That
