[sage-devel] Re: feedback on construction functor for symmetric functions

2024-02-14 Thread 'Martin R' via sage-devel
Thank you! To get a working prototype for the functional equations solver, the coercion issue with tensors is the most interesting issue. I am already quite happy that it works with symmetric functions in one variable! Apart from technicalities, it might then be interesting to explore whether

[sage-devel] Re: feedback on construction functor for symmetric functions

2024-02-11 Thread 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel
Hi Martin, I plan to look closely at this this week. Unfortunately I cannot offer anything quick now. Best, Travis On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 2:42:52 AM UTC+9 Martin R wrote: > Apart from that, I think the last bit I need to do is to make the > TensorProductFunctor inherit from

[sage-devel] Re: feedback on construction functor for symmetric functions

2024-02-11 Thread 'Martin R' via sage-devel
Apart from that, I think the last bit I need to do is to make the TensorProductFunctor inherit from MultivariateConstructionFunctor, to make coercion work for things like sage: h = SymmetricFunctions(ZZ).h() sage: T = tensor([h, h]) sage: T.base_ring() Integer Ring sage: 1/2*T.an_element()