Le mercredi 28 août 2019 21:29:29 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
>
>
> You are perfectly right: "check" would be more appropriate than "verbose"
> in this context.
> I'll open a ticket for this and make "check=True" the default.
>
This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28422.
Eric.
Hi Simon,
Le mercredi 28 août 2019 07:07:03 UTC+2, Simon King a écrit :
>
>
> Is the option really called "verbose=True"? Not "check=True", like in
> most other cases?
>
>
You are perfectly right: "check" would be more appropriate than "verbose"
in this context.
I'll open a ticket for this
Hi Eric,
On 2019-08-27, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> To avoid such mistake, you can run set_inverse() with the option
> verbose=True. Then the provided inverse transform is checked.
Is the option really called "verbose=True"? Not "check=True", like in
most other cases?
Best regards,
Simon
--
Le mardi 27 août 2019 16:51:20 UTC+2, Andreas Hermann a écrit :
>
> I am sorry, but this is a stupid mistake. The function defined via
> set_inverse() is not the inverse function since the first entry of atan2 is
> by definition the y-coordinate. If one swaps u and v in atan2 then
> everything
I am sorry, but this is a stupid mistake. The function defined via
set_inverse() is not the inverse function since the first entry of atan2 is
by definition the y-coordinate. If one swaps u and v in atan2 then
everything is fine.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
