Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-09-04 Thread William Stein
Indeed, that link is no longer valid. Please visit this one instead: https://tinyurl.com/yac6cyzg On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 7:48 PM, saad khalid wrote: > Hello: > > The link seems to be broken, I was hoping to take a second look at some of > the items on the wishlist. is there any way you could

[sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-09-04 Thread saad khalid
Hello: The link seems to be broken, I was hoping to take a second look at some of the items on the wishlist. is there any way you could repost it? Thank you. -Saad On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 3:18:32 PM UTC-4, William wrote: > > Hi, > > I just wrote a short talk that I'm about to give at

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-08-04 Thread Sébastien Labbé
The xmode option has three modes for tracebacks (Plain, Context and Verbose). By default, Sage is using Context. Plain does not give the context. Maybe we want to use this in Jupyter? Or else, add a fourth option? sage: %xmode Exception reporting mode: Plain sage: 1/0 Traceback (most recent

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-08-04 Thread mmarco
Do you know if something similar exists for jupyterlab? El sábado, 4 de agosto de 2018, 10:56:39 (UTC+2), Volker Braun escribió: > > There is a jupyter extension for that, though I haven't tried it... > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-08-04 Thread Volker Braun
There is a jupyter extension for that, though I haven't tried it... https://github.com/ipython-contrib/jupyter_contrib_nbextensions/tree/master/src/jupyter_contrib_nbextensions/nbextensions/skip-traceback On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 8:46:35 PM UTC+2, William wrote: > > In sagenb it would show

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-08-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 9:33:03 PM UTC+3, vdelecroix wrote: > > > > On 31/07/2018 05:57, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:34 PM Jeroen Demeyer > wrote: > >> > >> On 2018-07-30 18:31, Erik Bray wrote: > >>> This is a bit far-out, but what if we just didn't show tracebacks

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-08-03 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 31/07/2018 05:57, Erik Bray wrote: On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:34 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2018-07-30 18:31, Erik Bray wrote: This is a bit far-out, but what if we just didn't show tracebacks at all by default? Sorry to say, but that would be a horrible idea. Even if the tracebacks

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-31 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 4:04 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2018-07-31 15:57, Erik Bray wrote: > > That's no > > harder--easier even--than what we already ask of users when give them > > a path to the error log when Sage crashes on startup. > > Yes, but I also consider that "crash log" a bad

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-31 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2018-07-31 15:57, Erik Bray wrote: That's no harder--easier even--than what we already ask of users when give them a path to the error log when Sage crashes on startup. Yes, but I also consider that "crash log" a bad idea, so I wouldn't take that as example. It's kind of difficult to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-31 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 3:57 PM Erik Bray wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:34 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > > On 2018-07-30 18:31, Erik Bray wrote: > > > This is a bit far-out, but what if we just didn't show tracebacks at > > > all by default? > > > > Sorry to say, but that would be a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-31 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:34 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2018-07-30 18:31, Erik Bray wrote: > > This is a bit far-out, but what if we just didn't show tracebacks at > > all by default? > > Sorry to say, but that would be a horrible idea. Even if the tracebacks > are completely useless for

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-31 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Mon 2018-07-30 19:04:07 UTC+2, Erik Bray: > > prompt_toolkit is powerful-enough that traceback-folding could be done > on the CLI as well. It would probably require a keyboard-shortcut of > some kind to hide/show tracebacks, though for terminal emulators with > good mouse support it could also be

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-30 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2018-07-30 18:31, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> This is a bit far-out, but what if we just didn't show tracebacks at >> all by default? > > > Sorry to say, but that would be a horrible idea. Even if the tracebacks are > completely useless for

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-30 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2018-07-30 18:31, Erik Bray wrote: This is a bit far-out, but what if we just didn't show tracebacks at all by default? Sorry to say, but that would be a horrible idea. Even if the tracebacks are completely useless for ordinary users, they allow developers to debug an issue when posted on

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-30 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018, 9:31 AM Erik Bray wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:25 PM William Stein wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote: > > > On 2018-07-29 17:27, William Stein wrote: > > >> > > >> Even disentangling the preparser would help a lot... > > > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-30 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:00 PM Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-7, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:25 PM William Stein wrote: >> > >> > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> > > On 2018-07-29 17:27, William Stein wrote: >>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-30 Thread Nils Bruin
On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 9:31:21 AM UTC-7, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:25 PM William Stein > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote: > > > On 2018-07-29 17:27, William Stein wrote: > > >> > > >> Even disentangling the preparser would

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-30 Thread TB
On 30/07/18 19:31, Erik Bray wrote: This is a bit far-out, but what if we just didn't show tracebacks at all by default? Or at the very least, tracebacks originating from Sage itself? Then, for example, "1/0" will just give a ZeroDivisionError, not a full traceback deep somewhere into some

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-30 Thread Erik Bray
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:25 PM William Stein wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2018-07-29 17:27, William Stein wrote: > >> > >> Even disentangling the preparser would help a lot... > > > > > > That's the second-oldest open ticket: > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-29 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2018-07-29 17:27, William Stein wrote: >> >> Even disentangling the preparser would help a lot... > > > That's the second-oldest open ticket: > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/71 > Jeroen -- it looks like you actually implemented

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-29 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2018-07-29 17:27, William Stein wrote: Even disentangling the preparser would help a lot... That's the second-oldest open ticket: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/71 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-29 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018, 8:24 AM saad khalid wrote: > On the topic of error messages, I would like to add that this issue has > almost singlehandedly prevented any of my mathematics and physics > professors from using Sage or Cocalc in a classroom setting. This of course > Yes. It greatly

[sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-29 Thread saad khalid
On the topic of error messages, I would like to add that this issue has almost singlehandedly prevented any of my mathematics and physics professors from using Sage or Cocalc in a classroom setting. This of course doesn't say anything about whether they would consider using it for their own

[sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-25 Thread Nathan Dunfield
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 4:49:45 PM UTC-5, Timo Kaufmann wrote: > > I really like your wishlist! The all-or-nothing nature of sage and the > slow startup time (although it's actually more like 1.3 seconds with a warm > cache on my machine) are my biggest pain points. > I've encountered

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-25 Thread Timo Kaufmann
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2018 01:32:38 UTC+2 schrieb William: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Timo Kaufmann > wrote: > > I really like your wishlist! The all-or-nothing nature of sage and the > slow > > startup time > > (although it's actually more like 1.3 seconds with a warm cache > > on

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-25 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:03 AM jplab wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> It is great to have a recent snapshot of the status of Sage and a wishlist! >> >> This summer marks the 10th year when my brother showed me Sage for >> the first time at the beginning

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-25 Thread Erik Bray
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:03 AM jplab wrote: > > Hi, > > It is great to have a recent snapshot of the status of Sage and a wishlist! > > This summer marks the 10th year when my brother showed me Sage for > the first time at the beginning of my master (So happy I did not need to > use Maple or

[sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-25 Thread jplab
Hi, It is great to have a recent snapshot of the status of Sage and a wishlist! This summer marks the 10th year when my brother showed me Sage for the first time at the beginning of my master (So happy I did not need to use Maple or Matematica any more...). It is awesome to see it so lively

[sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-24 Thread Kwankyu Lee
Charming slides! I could sympathize with most of your wishlist. Many thanks that you started Sage project, around the time when I wished something like Sage! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-24 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 4:32:38 PM UTC-7, William wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Timo Kaufmann > wrote: > > I really like your wishlist! The all-or-nothing nature of sage and the > slow > > startup time > > (although it's actually more like 1.3 seconds with a warm cache >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-24 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Timo Kaufmann wrote: > I really like your wishlist! The all-or-nothing nature of sage and the slow > startup time > (although it's actually more like 1.3 seconds with a warm cache > on my machine) Precisely how are you benchmarking this, and what is your machine?

[sage-devel] Re: talk

2018-07-24 Thread Timo Kaufmann
I really like your wishlist! The all-or-nothing nature of sage and the slow startup time (although it's actually more like 1.3 seconds with a warm cache on my machine) are my biggest pain points. I'm not sure if its a good idea to separate user and developer error messages. I'm also not

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about the implementation of braid groups.

2012-12-13 Thread mmarco
I forgot to say that the worksheet is published in: https://abel.mat.ucm.es:8080/home/pub/0/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-devel group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk about sage -i and sage -f in the developer's guide?

2011-12-02 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2011-11-16 03:47, William Stein wrote: Set the environment variable DOT_SAGE to something under /tmp/. Then it shouldn't touch ~janssen/.sage. In theory, that is. Better set $HOME to somthing in /tmp, that's safer. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To

[sage-devel] Re: talk about sage -i and sage -f in the developer's guide?

2011-12-01 Thread Bill Janssen
On Nov 15, 6:47 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:46 PM, BillJanssenbill.jans...@gmail.com wrote: One trivial thing you could do would be to build from source in /tmp/, then just move your install to your home directory.  Sage supports moving complete

[sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage that I gave today

2011-11-22 Thread Bill Janssen
Nice graphic in there, William. Page 8 in the PDF. Just what I need for a talk this afternoon. Is it available as an image somwhere? Thanks. Bill On Nov 20, 12:05 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Thierry Dumont tdum...@math.univ-lyon1.fr

[sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage that I gave today

2011-11-22 Thread Bill Janssen
On Nov 22, 9:26 am, Bill Janssen bill.jans...@gmail.com wrote: Nice graphic in there, William.  Page 8 in the PDF.  Just what I need for a talk this afternoon.  Is it available as an image somwhere? Ah, got it. Pulled it out of the worksheet. Bill -- To post to this group, send an email to

[sage-devel] Re: talk about sage -i and sage -f in the developer's guide?

2011-11-15 Thread Georg S. Weber
On 15 Nov., 18:51, Bill Janssen bill.jans...@gmail.com wrote: It would be nice if the developer's guide talked about using sage -i and sage -f to test new spkg's.  In the section about building spkg's, perhaps. Yes. Two or three sentences, maybe? I think you could better formulate what you

[sage-devel] Re: talk about sage -i and sage -f in the developer's guide?

2011-11-15 Thread Bill Janssen
On Nov 15, 1:29 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote: On 15 Nov., 18:51, Bill Janssen bill.jans...@gmail.com wrote: It would be nice if the developer's guide talked about using sage -i and sage -f to test new spkg's.  In the section about building spkg's, perhaps. Yes.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk about sage -i and sage -f in the developer's guide?

2011-11-15 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Bill Janssen bill.jans...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 15, 1:29 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote: On 15 Nov., 18:51, Bill Janssen bill.jans...@gmail.com wrote: It would be nice if the developer's guide talked about using sage -i and sage -f to

[sage-devel] Re: talk about sage -i and sage -f in the developer's guide?

2011-11-15 Thread Bill Janssen
One trivial thing you could do would be to build from source in /tmp/, then just move your install to your home directory.  Sage supports moving complete installs. That's basically what I am doing. Still breaks because it's trying to do stuff in ~janssen/.sage/ as part of the build. I can

[sage-devel] Re: talk about sage -i and sage -f in the developer's guide?

2011-11-15 Thread kcrisman
On Nov 15, 8:46 pm, Bill Janssen bill.jans...@gmail.com wrote: One trivial thing you could do would be to build from source in /tmp/, then just move your install to your home directory.  Sage supports moving complete installs. That's basically what I am doing.  Still breaks because it's

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk about sage -i and sage -f in the developer's guide?

2011-11-15 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Bill Janssen bill.jans...@gmail.com wrote: One trivial thing you could do would be to build from source in /tmp/, then just move your install to your home directory.  Sage supports moving complete installs. That's basically what I am doing.  Still breaks

[sage-devel] Re: Talk on Sage at Montreal Python 17

2010-12-01 Thread kcrisman
I really like this example from it: def newton(f, z, precision=0.001) : while abs(f(x=z)) = precision: z = z - f(x=z) / diff(f)(x=z) return z complex_plot(lambda z : newton(f, z), (-1,1), (-1,1)) I've wanted to be able to plot basins of attraction for my students easily, but didn't have time to

[sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage...

2010-05-10 Thread Simon King
Hi William! On May 10, 6:41 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm giving this tutorial on Sage:      http://wstein.org/talks/20100510-texas/ On pages 11-13 of http://wstein.org/talks/20100510-texas/TACC--1.IntroductiontoSage.pdf the pictures appear to be broken. Is it just my

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage...

2010-05-10 Thread Tim Joseph Dumol
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote: Hi William! On May 10, 6:41 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm giving this tutorial on Sage: http://wstein.org/talks/20100510-texas/ On pages 11-13 of

[sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage...

2010-05-10 Thread William Stein
On Monday, May 10, 2010, Tim Joseph Dumol t...@timdumol.com wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote: Hi William! On May 10, 6:41 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm giving this tutorial on Sage:      

[sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage...

2010-05-10 Thread Jason Grout
On 05/10/2010 07:41 AM, William Stein wrote: On Monday, May 10, 2010, Tim Joseph Dumolt...@timdumol.com wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote: Hi William! On May 10, 6:41 am, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm giving this tutorial on

Re: [sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage...

2010-05-10 Thread Gonzalo Tornaria
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:41 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, May 10, 2010, Tim Joseph Dumol t...@timdumol.com wrote: I have the same problem. I see color noise instead of 3d plots. There is no support in the sage notebook for printing 3d plots.   I'm a little surprised

[sage-devel] Re: talk about sage and algebra

2009-11-03 Thread David Joyner
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'll give a 25-minute talk on doing algebra in Sage, at the Victorian Algebra Conference in about 36 hours. I decided to just use a notebook worksheet this time, which you are invited to check out at

[sage-devel] Re: talk about sage and algebra

2009-11-03 Thread Rob Beezer
Alex, Nicely done, and I really like how you move from designs to graphs to groups - it does a great job of illustrating the versatility and breadth of Sage. I hope a final version makes it to the right part of the wiki when you are done with it. Rob

[sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage at Emory University tomorrow

2009-02-26 Thread Alex Ghitza
Hi William, A few comments: page 36, first line: An nonsingular should be A nonsingular page 36, Faltings' theorem: finitely rational points should be finitely many rational points page 36, BSD: again, finitely should be finitely many page 41: seeing P, 2*P, and 3*P does not really convince me

[sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage at Emory University tomorrow

2009-02-26 Thread Carl Witty
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:04 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm giving a talk on Sage at Emory University tomorrow:   http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/tmp/talk.pdf The first half is similar to the talk I gave recently at MSR.  The second half -- on the BSD

[sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage at Emory University tomorrow

2009-02-26 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:04 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm giving a talk on Sage at Emory University tomorrow:   http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/tmp/talk.pdf The first half is

[sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage at Emory University tomorrow

2009-02-26 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi William, A few comments: page 36, first line: An nonsingular should be A nonsingular page 36, Faltings' theorem: finitely rational points should be finitely many rational points page 36, BSD: again, finitely should

[sage-devel] Re: talk on Sage at Emory University tomorrow

2009-02-26 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Feb 26, 2009, at 11:06 PM, William Stein wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi William, A few comments: page 36, first line: An nonsingular should be A nonsingular page 36, Faltings' theorem: finitely rational points should be finitely

[sage-devel] Re: Talk slides, feedback appreciated

2008-10-30 Thread Craig Citro
Hey Marshall ... I just had a glance, and it looks great! Out of curiousity, who is the intended audience? -cc --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[sage-devel] Re: Talk slides, feedback appreciated

2008-10-30 Thread mhampton
Mostly undergraduate math majors, but there will be some faculty there from various departments who might decide to use sage in teaching or research. -Marshall On Oct 30, 12:39 pm, Craig Citro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Marshall ... I just had a glance, and it looks great! Out of

[sage-devel] Re: Talk slides, feedback appreciated

2008-10-30 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Marshall, On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:28 AM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am about to give a talk about Sage, any feedback is appreciated. I am using Keynote on a mac, so the pdf does not look as good, but presumably more of you can take a look this way. There is a short movie and

[sage-devel] Re: Talk slides, feedback appreciated

2008-10-30 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Oct 30, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi Marshall, On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:28 AM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am about to give a talk about Sage, any feedback is appreciated. I am using Keynote on a mac, so the pdf does not look as good, but presumably more of you

[sage-devel] Re: Talk slides, feedback appreciated

2008-10-30 Thread mhampton
Thanks for the feedback. I'll add a world map first. I do use my slides as a counterpoint to what I'm saying, so there are a lot of gaps I fill in verbally. I will be revamping this talk into another version I will present at another university, so anything else is appreciated. Jason has

[sage-devel] Re: Talk slides, feedback appreciated

2008-10-30 Thread Dan Drake
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 at 01:26PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: Yep. One thing that struck me is that the title is around the world and there's no world map. I agree, if you say around the world, there should be a world map, not just a most-of-the-continental-US map, western Europe map, and so on.

[sage-devel] Re: Talk slides, feedback appreciated

2008-10-30 Thread Minh Nguyen
Dan Drake wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 at 01:26PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: Yep. One thing that struck me is that the title is around the world and there's no world map. I agree, if you say around the world, there should be a world map, not just a most-of-the-continental-US map, western

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-26 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Sunday 25 November 2007, William Stein wrote: On Nov 25, 2007 11:52 AM, David Roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to agree. The slide where you list p-adic numbers, p-adic L-functions and p-adic height pairings kinda jumped out at me. While I'm obviously interested in that kind of

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread David Joyner
I think this looks really excellent! Possibly there is a typo on page 27. Did you mean installation guide where you said programming guide? On Nov 25, 2007 10:14 AM, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, Sage is among the finalists of this year's Les Trophees du Libre

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Sunday 25 November 2007, David Joyner wrote: I think this looks really excellent! Possibly there is a typo on page 27. Did you mean installation guide where you said programming guide? I meant: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/html/prog/index.html Cheers, Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
I think it looks very good. Just one idea to the point you already made - I myself haven't heard of magma, before SAGE mentioned it. I've heard about Matlab, I myself used it a lot, but Python + NumPy + SciPy can do everything I myself needed in Matlab. So where SAGE really competes from

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Nov 25, 2007 5:06 PM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it looks very good. Just one idea to the point you already made - I myself haven't heard of magma, before SAGE mentioned it. I've heard about Matlab, I myself used it a lot, but Python + NumPy + SciPy can do

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread David Joyner
On Nov 25, 2007 10:59 AM, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 25 November 2007, David Joyner wrote: I think this looks really excellent! Possibly there is a typo on page 27. Did you mean installation guide where you said programming guide? I meant:

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Sunday 25 November 2007, David Joyner wrote: On Nov 25, 2007 10:59 AM, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 25 November 2007, David Joyner wrote: I think this looks really excellent! Possibly there is a typo on page 27. Did you mean installation guide where you said

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread Craig Citro
Martin -- looks great! Just a few typos: Outline: Usually people say pros and cons instead of cons and pros ... *shrug* p. 13: there's actually a typo in the SAGE window you have going: admissable - admissible p. 16: it's John Bober, not Bobber p. 21: lots of missing commas between names, and a

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread Philippe Saade
Hi, don't you think you should add examples closer to applied math as Discreet Fourier transform, financial math, Finite Element Method, etc ? Some explanations : I am a french teacher and if the Jury is not aware of the importance of p-adic stuff or Elliptic Curve story, it will all appear

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread David Roe
I have to agree. The slide where you list p-adic numbers, p-adic L-functions and p-adic height pairings kinda jumped out at me. While I'm obviously interested in that kind of stuff, it won't appeal as much to a non-specialist audience. One might argue that as things implemented natively in

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread William Stein
On Nov 25, 2007 11:52 AM, David Roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to agree. The slide where you list p-adic numbers, p-adic L-functions and p-adic height pairings kinda jumped out at me. While I'm obviously interested in that kind of stuff, it won't appeal as much to a non-specialist

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread Philippe Saade
On Nov 25, 2007 10:24 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 25, 2007 11:52 AM, David Roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to agree. The slide where you list p-adic numbers, p-adic L-functions and p-adic height pairings kinda jumped out at me. While I'm obviously interested in

[sage-devel] Re: Talk about SAGE at Les Trophees du Libre 2007 competition

2007-11-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
And i would add a simple image : OpenOffice means that anybody in the world can have access to an office suite, which covers 99% of anybody's need. It's obvious that OpenOffice is NOT the best office suite and has some limitations. SAGE might soon be (maybe I'm wrong but...) usable by

[sage-devel] Re: talk by Eric Raymond

2007-05-28 Thread William Stein
On 5/28/07, Emil Volcheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been spending my vacation this weekend at Balticon, the Baltimore Science Fiction convention (See http://www.Balticon.org/ ). I spend most of my time in the science track, and one of the speakers was noted open source guru, Eric Raymond,

[sage-devel] Re: talk on SAGE today

2007-01-19 Thread Iftikhar Burhanuddin
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, William Stein wrote: I gave a talk on SAGE today entitled From SAGE 1.0 to SAGE 2.0: One year of hard work by over 30 people... You can look at it here: http://modular.math.washington.edu/talks/2007-01-19-sage/ (Click on talk.html, or get the

[sage-devel] Re: talk on SAGE today

2007-01-19 Thread Timothy Clemans
He recorded it. He did not used PDF. On 1/19/07, Iftikhar Burhanuddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, William Stein wrote: I gave a talk on SAGE today entitled From SAGE 1.0 to SAGE 2.0: One year of hard work by over 30 people... You can look at it here: