On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 12:50 -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 1:45:31 PM UTC-7 TB wrote:
>
> Should `sage -i pandoc`, at least in an interactive session, first
> recommend to install it from the distro, and not default to conda?
>
Eventually I think the "sage"
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 2:08:40 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 1:45:31 PM UTC-7 TB wrote:
Should `sage -i pandoc`, at least in an interactive session, first
recommend to install it from the distro, and not default to conda?
I wouldn't want "./sage -i
What is now the plan of action?
In my experience, the conda workflow is currently already more stable than
using sage distribution. Conda so far never failed to install a dependency
for me (but there were some minor hick-ups with the integration in sage
from time to time), while I was always
Hey All!
Please let me know I am included within the accepted organization or not?
According to Karachi, Pakistan timezone last night was my GSoC'23 result.
Please guide me through the procedure how to check my GSoC'23 result.
Name :- Sumaiya Qureshi (Karachi, Pakistan)
I opted for
Sure, but these just the first few packages. Better
list: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35583
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 5:10:43 PM UTC-7 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-04-29 at 13:10 -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> >
> > This drops platform support for 32-bit Linux (see
On Sat, 2023-04-29 at 13:10 -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> This drops platform support for 32-bit Linux (see
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/Sage-9.8-Release-Tour#availability-of-sage-98-and-installation-help)
>
> for these optional packages. We will need a decision if this OK.
>
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 1:45:31 PM UTC-7 TB wrote:
Should `sage -i pandoc`, at least in an interactive session, first
recommend to install it from the distro, and not default to conda?
I missed this detail about "sage -i" in my response above.
This is an interesting idea, but is
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 1:45:31 PM UTC-7 TB wrote:
On 29/04/2023 23:10, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
In this PR (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35585), the three
optional packagesinfo, valgrind, rubiks are switched from our custom
installation scripts to a (binary) installation from
On 29/04/2023 23:10, Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
In this PR (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35585),
the three optional packagesinfo, valgrind, rubiks are
switched from our custom installation scripts to a (binary)
installation from
In this PR (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35585), the three
optional packagesinfo, valgrind, rubiks are switched from our custom
installation scripts to a (binary) installation from conda-forge.
This drops platform support for 32-bit Linux (see
That's now https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35585 (needs review);
starting with optional packages, not standard infrastructure packages
though.
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 12:14:56 AM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
> +1 to just using conda for all basic infrastructure packages if the host
+1 to just using conda for all basic infrastructure packages if the host
doesn't have them. Just put a conda env in the PATH and done.
In my experience these work really well. I've only gotten issues with conda
when you veer off the trodden path too much, e.g. I've had nothing but
trouble
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 1:24:01 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
The next in line will be jupyter and friends.
I agree with this point; specifically the front-end parts of
Jupyter/JupyterLab, which run in a separate Python process (and therefore
can be installed in a completely separate
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 2:15 AM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> A previous sage-devel thread led to this question, which I think is important
> and timely to discuss.
>
> **What was/is/will be the *purpose* of maintaining the Sage distribution?**
> (Historically; as of today; and looking forward by a
A previous sage-devel thread led to this question, which I think is
important and timely to discuss.
**What was/is/will be the *purpose* of maintaining the Sage distribution?**
(Historically; as of today; and looking forward by a year or two.)
Here are some of my thoughts on this question:
1.
15 matches
Mail list logo
