On Monday, May 29, 2017 at 12:03:59 PM UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> Yes but if Pynac had such a type, and fast, the operations with any roots
> (as parts of expressions) would be much simplified. Relying on
> Python/Cython code from the C++ end is always tedious and slow.
>
I don't know a
Yes but if Pynac had such a type, and fast, the operations with any roots
(as parts of expressions) would be much simplified. Relying on
Python/Cython code from the C++ end is always tedious and slow.
On Mon, May 29, 2017, 10:12 John Cremona wrote:
>
>
> On 29 May 2017
On 29 May 2017 07:59, "Ralf Stephan" wrote:
The case that started me was
sage: a=SR(1/2)
sage: b=SR(3)
sage: %timeit _=a^b
The slowest run took 9.38 times longer than the fastest. This could
mean that an intermediate result is being cached.
10 loops, best of 3: 2.14 µs
The case that started me was
sage: a=SR(1/2)
sage: b=SR(3)
sage: %timeit _=a^b
The slowest run took 9.38 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that
an intermediate result is being cached.
10 loops, best of 3: 2.14 µs per loop
sage: %timeit _=b^a
1 loops, best of 3: 62.1 µs per
On Monday, May 29, 2017 at 6:09:33 AM UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 11:40:08 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-05-26 15:19, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>> > The qqbar source does not use a lower-level library.
>>
>> What do you mean with this? It actually uses
On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 11:40:08 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2017-05-26 15:19, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> > The qqbar source does not use a lower-level library.
>
> What do you mean with this? It actually uses quite a large fraction of
> Sage (number fields, polynomials, interval
On 2017-05-26 15:19, Ralf Stephan wrote:
The qqbar source does not use a lower-level library.
What do you mean with this? It actually uses quite a large fraction of
Sage (number fields, polynomials, interval arithmetic, ...)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On 26 May 2017 at 14:19, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The qqbar source does not use a lower-level library. My question:
> is there a stand-alone open-source fast version of such a package?
> Reason I'm asking is linkage with Pynac.
As far as I know the only other software
Hello,
The qqbar source does not use a lower-level library. My question:
is there a stand-alone open-source fast version of such a package?
Reason I'm asking is linkage with Pynac.
Regards,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To