Hi!
> It looks that QA of Fedora packages is a part of your job now, right?
Not really, I haven't been involved with that at all.
> which is an optional pari package Fedora does not provide for some reason.
Is there an issue filed about this (with fedora)? Not sure how responsive
they are, but
Hi Jakub,
It looks that QA of Fedora packages is a part of your job now, right?
IIRC, we also have problems with pari-gp Fedora
packaging
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32359
TLDR; system pari's packages don't allow to build gp2c, which is an
optional pari package Fedora does not provide for
Just to update: I compiled 9.6 from source and everything's as expected.
Thanks
On Saturday, 10 September 2022 at 01:05:07 UTC+2 Jakub Sliacan wrote:
> Thanks Dima,
>
> Opened an issue as you suggested:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125737. I'm surprised nobody
> else has hit
Thanks Dima,
Opened an issue as you suggested:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2125737. I'm surprised nobody
else has hit the same issue yet, I just tried sage 9.4 and I can't get
nauty generators to work either (slightly different behavior though).
Anyways, thanks again.
Jakub
Hi Jakub,
this looks like a Fedora packaging problem.
Please report it to them.
Dima
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022, 23:12 Jakub Sliacan, wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm using sage 9.6 on Fedora 36, installed via dnf. I am seeing the
> following. The version of nauty package that I see installed is
>
Hi!
I'm using sage 9.6 on Fedora 36, installed via dnf. I am seeing the
following. The version of nauty package that I see installed is
nauty-2.7.4-1.fc36.x86_64.
```
sage: for t in digraphs.tournaments_nauty(6):
: print(t)
:
