On a possibly related note, I read somewhere that Catalina does not support
32-bit apps. So I suppose using older binaries that were not compiled with
this support (if that is even relevant to Sage, though at least for Cygwin
at one point it was) may be problematic.
--
You received this
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 11:17 AM John H Palmieri
wrote:
> A few days ago, after the Catalina release, I used Homebrew to build gcc,
> and it worked. Well, it built from source, which took a while, but it built
> a version of gfortran which worked well enough to build Sage. (As far as I
> know,
A few days ago, after the Catalina release, I used Homebrew to build gcc,
and it worked. Well, it built from source, which took a while, but it built
a version of gfortran which worked well enough to build Sage. (As far as I
know, it's completely functional, but the only reason I install
the fact that Homebrew is not yet ready for 10.15 speaks for itself.
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019, 14:56 David Joyner, wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 4:26 AM Volker Braun
> wrote:
>
>> I just upgraded the OSX buildbot and Sage works in case anybody is
>> wondering. This is the first time in years
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 4:26 AM Volker Braun wrote:
> I just upgraded the OSX buildbot and Sage works in case anybody is
> wondering. This is the first time in years that the latest OSX release
> doesn't introduce major toolchain issues and/or scrambles the filesystem,
> hope this starts a trend
