Fwd: [sage-devel] Trac down?

I've logged in, and see quite an overload of the machine, mainly by cgit, 40-50 processes, taking all CPUs... I'll reboot again, but I don't know what to do to fix this properly. -- Forwarded message - From: Travis Scrimshaw Date: Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:50 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [sage-devel] Trac down?

I think it has gone back down. :/ Best, Travis On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 3:26:44 AM UTC+10, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 19:20:50 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : >> >> OK, all should be back to normal. If not, please shout... >> >> Thanks DIma! > Everything is

[sage-devel] Re: bug: factoring symbolic expressions containing exponentials

Thu 2019-04-11 07:07:46 UTC+2, Ralf Stephan: > > Probably best to revert #23835 then, if you insist on the blocker > assessment. > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23835 > Is there no hope for a fix in Pynac? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-devel] patchbot questions

On Tuesday, April 23, 2019 at 12:18:13 AM UTC-7, Daniel Krenn wrote: > > On 23.04.19 01:37, John H Palmieri wrote: > > I was running a patchbot successfully until some time last week. For > > reasons I don't understand, I did "git pull" on the patchbot, and now it > > won't run with Python 2,

Re: [sage-devel] Trac down?

Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 19:20:50 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > OK, all should be back to normal. If not, please shout... > > Thanks DIma! Everything is fine now. Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Adding doctest

Hi, Yes, that's what I meant but thank you for making it clearer! It might help others as well :-) Best regards. El mar., 23 abr. 2019 a las 15:53, Simon King () escribió: > Hi Bea, > > On 2019-04-23, Bea Galiana wrote: > > I've been reading the general conventions about writing tests but I'm

Re: [sage-devel] Trac down?

OK, all should be back to normal. If not, please shout... On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:07 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > will reboot soon again, please bear with me. > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:05 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > rebooted, seems to be back up. > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:59

Re: [sage-devel] Trac down?

will reboot soon again, please bear with me. On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:05 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > rebooted, seems to be back up. > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:59 PM Eric Gourgoulhon > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > It seems the page https://trac.sagemath.org/ is not responding. > > It was OK

Re: [sage-devel] Trac down?

rebooted, seems to be back up. On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:59 PM Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems the page https://trac.sagemath.org/ is not responding. > It was OK an hour ago or so. > One can perform "git pull" from Trac though (i.e. git://trac.sagemath.org/ is > up). > > Eric. > >

[sage-devel] Trac down?

Hi, It seems the page https://trac.sagemath.org/ is not responding. It was OK an hour ago or so. One can perform "git pull" from Trac though (i.e. git://trac.sagemath.org/ is up). Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To

Re: [sage-devel] Sage and GPFS

indeed, I see something funny about autotools in the log - whereas autotools are not needed to build Sage from a distribution tarball. E.g. (after removing extra lines from -j40): ... [fplll-5.2.1] Building fplll-5.2.1 [fplll-5.2.1] make[4]: Entering directory

Re: [sage-devel] Sage and GPFS

Thank you for your answer, from what I've googled this seems to occur in more recent versions of Sage. Here's the output of 'make -j40' from my most recent attempt to install Sage (16.000 line seem a bit much for github

Re: [sage-devel] Sage and GPFS

Thank you for your answer, from what I've googled this seems to occur in more recent versions of Sage. Here's the output of 'make -j40' from my most recent attempt to install Sage. All GPFS Server times match. Juri Am