> I take this opportunity to thank the Sage community and the developers of
> related softwares integrated for this Huge effort and to let you know of
> the positive comments that I receive form the research community in MSC-52.
> THANK YOU SO MUCH!
>
> If you are interested in a deeper
Their script is
here: https://github.com/cython/cython/blob/master/Tools/ci-run.sh#L102
On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 2:22:58 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote:
> After your post, I unpacked a vanilla Cython tarball and ran "make
> PYTHON=python3" and "make test PYTHON=python3", and I'm
After your post, I unpacked a vanilla Cython tarball and ran "make
PYTHON=python3" and "make test PYTHON=python3", and I'm seeing the same
behavior as when running the test suite through Sage, although it has only
(so far) produced 20 minutes of the messages.
On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at
Dear all,
During the Summer, I was curious to know more about the impact of Sage in
my research area (MSC2020-52: Convex and Discrete Geometry).
If I recall correctly, around 2010-11 was the integration of ppl as a
backend for polyhedral computations, and it more or less also corresponds
to
In our CI runs, we disable the testsuite for this reason -
see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32785
We must be doing something wrong in spkg-check. Cython's own CI finishes
within 15 minutes - see for
example https://github.com/cython/cython/runs/7788707146?check_suite_focus=true
On
What's the deal with the Cython test suite? I accidentally ran `make` with
`SAGE_CHECK=yes` last night, and when I checked this morning, the Cython
test suite had been running for almost 12 hours. The log currently ends with
runTest (__main__.EndToEndTest)
[-1] End-to-end common_include_dir ...
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 03:13:23PM +, Thierry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> > Am I doing something wrong? I would have expected the last line to return
> > False.
> >
> >
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Am I doing something wrong? I would have expected the last line to return
> False.
>
> ┌┐
> │ SageMath version 9.6, Release Date: 2022-05-15
The "==" operator for symbolics creates a new symbolic expression:
sage: hr=(x^2+2*x+1)
sage: hl=(x+1)^2
sage: E = hr == hl
sage: E
x^2 + 2*x + 1 == (x + 1)^2
sage: type(E)
To check if the two expressions are actually the same, I think you can use
the "is" statement:
sage: f = x + 1
sage: g =
Am I doing something wrong? I would have expected the last line to
return False.
┌┐
│ SageMath version 9.6, Release Date: 2022-05-15 │
│ Using Python 3.10.4. Type "help()" for help. │
10 matches
Mail list logo
