fyi, added PR
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35960
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 12:30:53 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 5:48:00 AM UTC-7 Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
>
> After some struggle, build sagemath with maxima 5.47 upstream.
>
>
> Open a PR with the
This is a low-key hybrid activity, taking place online (Zoom + Zulip) and
in person (self-organized), co-located with FPSAC 2023 in Davis, California.
https://wiki.sagemath.org/days120
July 19 13:00-22:00 Pacific Daylight Time
There is no fixed program yet. Contributed talks / activities are
Le dimanche 16 juillet 2023 à 13:14:14 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
[ Snip... ]
Some flavours of Linux, e.g. Gentoo (and Debian?)
allows you to have maxima built with ECL system+wide.
Not Debian, alas... unless you bite the bullet and install the whole
"*sage*" packaging of Sage ...
FWIW, neither Maxima, Giac, Sympy, Fricas, the Wolfram engine nor the Rubi
integrator seem to be able to give a closed form to this antiderivative…
- Maxima (5.46.0) fails as reported above relatively quickly (a few
seconds).
-
the default integrator (i. e. what is called
I get the same error when evaluating this integral in Sage with its own
Maxima. (version 5.46.0).
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 10:30:53 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 5:48:00 AM UTC-7 Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
>
> After some struggle, build sagemath with maxima
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 5:48:00 AM UTC-7 Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
After some struggle, build sagemath with maxima 5.47 upstream.
Open a PR with the upgrade please
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this
yes, stable versions would be good enough. And not too much work,
hopefully. So, please ask Julian to be added to the sagemath organisation
on dockerhub.
Frederic
Le dimanche 16 juillet 2023 à 13:38:47 UTC+2, seb@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> I successfully built one for stable 10.0, two weeks
After some struggle, build sagemath with maxima 5.47 upstream.
Could someone see if they get same error I see on this one example?
>sage
│ SageMath version 10.1.beta6, Release Date: 2023-07-09 │
│ Using Python 3.11.3. Type "help()" for help. │
┃ Warning: this
On 2023-07-15 19:05:42, 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-devel wrote:
> Maxima uses SBCL lisp:
>
> >maxima
> Maxima 5.47.0 https://maxima.sourceforge.io
> using Lisp SBCL 2.3.3
>
> Are there any step-by-step instructions then how to make sagemath 10.1 use
> maxima 4.7?
>
Not really. You need
On 2023-07-15 18:56:09, Nils Bruin wrote:
> It must be maxima running on ECL and there must be a
> maxima.fas lisp package for ecl (which isn't built in the vanilla maxima
> build).
That part is finally upstream in maxima-5.47.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
I successfully built one for stable 10.0, two weeks ago using the current
version of the docker/Dockerfile following the instructions given there (in
section HOWTO use this file to manually create new images for Docker Hub).
I haven't really used it yet. However, Sage 10.0 starts and works
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023, 03:05 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-devel, <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Maxima uses SBCL lisp:
>
> >maxima
> Maxima 5.47.0 https://maxima.sourceforge.io
> using Lisp SBCL 2.3.3
>
> Are there any step-by-step instructions then how to make sagemath 10.1 use
> maxima
12 matches
Mail list logo
