Thanks Dima for cleaning up my mess. Next time I'll not use git when lying
in the bed with a flu ;-)
I guess the problem with the branch protection rules is that they actually
don't apply to maintainers because of " Do not allow bypassing the above
settings" is disabled. Not sure if we can
Marc, you should try something like this:
https://github.com/edgarcosta/pyfib/commit/f30cd702f5b8610a284b1b1f425ef22b2a2a11fa
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 6:49 PM Marc Culler wrote:
> I am not able to build the optional package p_group_cohomology in 10.2.rc2
> due to cython errors.
>
> The first
On 2023-11-16 00:51:12, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> This package produces mathematically incorrect results, as was shown
> on a trac ticket a couple of years ago, and no movement then. Demote
> to experimental?
There's not much distinction at this point, but if we're going by the
"builds on supported
This package produces mathematically incorrect results, as was shown on a trac
ticket a couple of years ago, and no movement then. Demote to experimental?
On 15 November 2023 23:57:07 GMT, Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>This will need an adjustment for namespace packages, see
This will need an adjustment for namespace packages, see
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/efuM_ruoOEk/m/UZ1QTohVEQAJ
On Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 3:49:04 PM UTC-8 Marc Culler wrote:
> I am not able to build the optional package p_group_cohomology in 10.2.rc2
> due to cython
I am not able to build the optional package p_group_cohomology in 10.2.rc2
due to cython errors.
The first error looks like:
[p_group_cohomology-3.3.3.p1] Error compiling Cython file:
[p_group_cohomology-3.3.3.p1] ---
-
Please all cool it down.
John
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 04:59, John H Palmieri
wrote:
> If I respond using "verb" as a verb, do you really think I'm seriously
> criticizing you about using "vendor" as a verb? You're telling me to get a
> life? Get a sense of humor.
>
> On Tuesday, November 14,
