[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: use "blocker" label only for PRs; use "critical" label for Issues

Voting is closed. Thanks for those who gave attention and voted. 0 clear positive (+1) votes 4 clear negative (-1) votes Hence my proposal is rejected. Other remarks: - Dima's proposal ("grave" instead of "critical") is something to consider if this proposal was accepted. - Sorry to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Help and Advice | Arithmetic of Jacobians in the Split/Real Model is Broken

Thanks for mentioning the related discussion. We checked that in the new implementation in Giacomo's repository, this issue is solved. In the example that was given in the chat, we obtain the following output: ``` sage: R. = QQ[] sage: f = 144*x^6 - 240*x^5 + 148*x^4 + 16*x^3 - 16*x^2 - 4*x + 1

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Labels and Reviewing

Addressing a comment from Travis on the voting thread: "but might want to consider cases when its 2 vs 1 as requiring at least one other person involved. (Sorry for being late to realize this.)" This border case was actually

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Use "CI Fix" label for merging into continuous integration runs

+1 On Monday, March 4, 2024 at 5:43:47 PM UTC+9 David Roe wrote: > The following proposal has been made several times the last few weeks: in > PR #37428 , in this thread > and then in this >

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: disputed PRs

Essentially +1 but might want to consider cases when its 2 vs 1 as requiring at least one other person involved. (Sorry for being late to realize this.) Best, Travis On Monday, March 4, 2024 at 5:23:39 PM UTC+9 David Roe wrote: > With no further discussion on this thread >

[sage-devel] Re: Vote: Sage Code of Conduct

Right, please email your vote to that group. Only members of the committee can actually see the postings. On Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 10:44:03 AM UTC-8 Martin R wrote: > Thank you - apparently, I do not have permission to see that group. I'll > try to send my vote by email. > > On Thursday

[sage-devel] Re: Vote: Sage Code of Conduct

Thank you - apparently, I do not have permission to see that group. I'll try to send my vote by email. On Thursday 7 March 2024 at 19:39:14 UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote: > Martin: it's "sage-conduct" at googlegroups.com. > > On Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 10:29:58 AM UTC-8 Martin R wrote: > >>

[sage-devel] Re: Vote: Sage Code of Conduct

Martin: it's "sage-conduct" at googlegroups.com. On Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 10:29:58 AM UTC-8 Martin R wrote: > For some reason, I cannot see the name of the newsgroup I should be > sending my vote to. (I am using the google groups webinterface) > > Martin > On Thursday 7 March 2024 at

[sage-devel] Re: Vote: Sage Code of Conduct

For some reason, I cannot see the name of the newsgroup I should be sending my vote to. (I am using the google groups webinterface) Martin On Thursday 7 March 2024 at 19:13:42 UTC+1 David Roe wrote: > Dear Sage developers, > Thank you for those you nominated people for the committee following

[sage-devel] Vote: Sage Code of Conduct

Dear Sage developers, Thank you for those you nominated people for the committee following my request , and thank you for those of you willing to serve. The nominees are Nils Braun (nbr...@sfu.ca) J-P Labbé