Hey,
Here's the results of the tests I have done and my interpretations.
Calling view() (from the notebook) calls the underlying OS's latex
compiler, and then I believe the notebook displays the resulting pdf
in the output window. So by doing ctrl-C twice to get to the shell,
then running sudo
John,
I tried using it and I got the following error:
Error: convert (from the ImageMagick suite) does not
appear to be installed. Displaying PDFLaTeX output
requires this program, so please install and try again.
Go to http://www.imagemagick.org to download it.
Latex error
This is likely
Hey,
Originally I was thinking the global namespace, but to avoid
breaking code (and apparently to conform more to python coding
practices), I am now thinking for this case we expose only CartanDatum
to the user and have static references to the subsequent classes
(accessed as attributes). For
Nicolas and John,
I added ImageMagick (since it's Fedora: yum install
ImageMagick ), did the jsmath_avoid_list('tikz') command, and I was
able to properly view the pdf. However it does not work if I don't do
the jsmath_avoid command. John, perhaps you could elaborate why you
thought to use this
Here you mean latexing a partition using it's Ferrers diagram? Then this is:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4355
which has been in need for a volunteer for three years.
Yes, so Travis please use this ticket number for your patch!
It has been done. I basically just called
Certainly something that's been though of a lot, and deserves yet more
thoughts. Have you explored the related:
-http://combinat.sagemath.org/code/file/tip/sage/categories/with_reali...
-http://combinat.sagemath.org/code/file/tip/sage/categories/examples/r...
I looked at them, and I don't
Here's the new patch:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12314
I know that skew_partitions/tableau also needs a latex output as well,
is there anything else? Also I am thinking of changing the structure
instead of the output file (which just contains the array_to_tex()
function and I
Hey everyone,
Sorry about that, my editor did that automatically. I've turned off
that feature.
Thank you for doing that Nicolas.
Travis
On Mar 5, 1:50 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Hi Travis,
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:49:07AM -0800, Anne Schilling
Hey Nicolas,
First off, when I try to apply the queue, I get the following conflict:
patching file doc/en/reference/combinat/index.rst
Hunk #1 FAILED at 3
1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
doc/en/reference/combinat/index.rst.rej
patch failed, unable to continue (try -v)
patch
Okay, then its something with 5.rc0. However its moot since the support for
pre-5.x is dropped.
Thanks Nicolas and Florent for all your hard work!
Best,
Travis
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:16:33 AM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
Travis,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:05:02PM -0700, Travis
Schilling wrote:
On 5/15/12 12:18 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:41:51AM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
Okay, then its something with 5.rc0. However its moot since the
support
for pre-5.x is dropped.
Don't tell the others, but I am still running rc0
Hey everyone,
So the old permutations patch was sufficient (minus a few doc-strings
tests which were in #9831 that is no longer in the queue), and I couldn't
produce an error with WeightedIntegerVectors. However there is still the
previously noted conflict with
if:
- an input is a matrix (or coerce-able into one)
- a matrix has (non-negative) integer entries
- check if the matrix is sparse (to improve iterations)
Best,
Travis
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:19:11 PM UTC-7, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
Hey everyone,
So the old permutations patch was sufficient
Biwords. Makes sense. Stanley just referred to them as generalized
permutations or 2-line arrays.
While I can implement biwords easily, how about my original question on
checking if an input is a matrix (or coerseable into one)?
Thanks,
Travis
On Friday, May 18, 2012 5:17:38 AM UTC-7,
I don't really know; you probably want to ask on sage-devel.
Will do. Thanks.
Now to properly separate out the generalized permutations / two-line array
/ biwords, I'm thinking of creating two new classes.
The first I'd call TwoLineArray which inherits from CombinatorialObject
which
11305 patch changed.
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:14:19 PM UTC+1, John H Palmieri wrote:
In the combinat queue, some files contain non-ascii characters. Several
participants at Sage-Combinat Days 40 have run into problems with this:
when there are non-ascii characters, if
Hey,
I'm also getting an error when
applying trac_9265_tableaux_categories_jb.patch. Is this related?
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 7:46:15 PM UTC+1, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi!
The patch queue is currently broken with sage-5.1.
Nicolas claims that he fixed this before lunch,
of sage are
you using?
You should upgrade to sage-5.1 most likely!
Anne
On 7/13/12 4:23 AM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
Hey,
I'm also getting an error when applying
trac_9265_tableaux_categories_jb.patch. Is this related?
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 7:46
' patch.
I'll try to restore them later.
-Mike
On Friday, 13 July 2012 09:14:47 UTC-5, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi Travis,
For me everything applies fine under sage-5.1. Which version of sage are
you using?
You should upgrade to sage-5.1 most likely!
Anne
On 7/13/12 4:23 AM, Travis
Nicolas,
I'm apply the same guard to #6538. Let me know if there's a better
approach to this.
With #12925 applied, #6538 applies for me. Thus the queue should work now
(at least with respect to my patch).
Thanks,
Travis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
above).
For pictures in latex, I usually prefer the Ferrers diagram notation. This
is also useful for
the upcoming rigged configuration code. But we could indeed have two
methods. I think Travis Scrimshaw
(my student) is the person who recently changed this.
Yes, I was the one who changed
Hey Andrew,
I like the named argument suggestion except that it having routines parse
input is, I think, generally a bad idea as it leads to slower code.
Currently most of these routines actually accept as input EITHER two
integers, i and j say, or a cell=(i,j) and then they have to decide
Hey Andrew,
I guess that no one is working on converting partitions to the category
framework since no one has said anything. I'll volunteer to do this
once/if? my partition tuples patches make it through. Until it's clear what
is happening with these I'd rather not start another large
Also, for reference, I'm running Ubuntu 10.02 (on a VirtualBox VM from a
host OS of Vista).
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, August 9, 2012 1:44:49 AM UTC-7, Christian Stump wrote:
Since there were still people having problems to install sage 5.2 (or
higher), here is a discussion on sage-support
Hey Andrew,
I will be doing my review this week (sorry for the delay). Please make
sure the patch on trac is current.
Thanks,
Travis
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 5:51:39 AM UTC-7, Andrew Mathas wrote:
I rebased Jason's trac_9265_tableaux_categories_am.patch and moved it to
the top of the
Hey Andrew,
I have no complaints. I've put myself down as the reviewer on the trac
ticket, so let me know when the patch is ready for a review.
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 5:11:03 PM UTC-7, Andrew Mathas wrote:
I remembered that I did in fact discuss doing these deprecations
Hey,
For partitions, compositions, tableau it might make sense for a slice to
return an object of the same type. Although I would be against making this
feature completely consistent because, for example, I definitely want the
following behaviour to remain:
sage: Partition([4,4,3,2])[2]
Anne,
Can I just say that I really don't like vimdiff and it never has wanted
to work for me. Thank you for correcting this.
Sorry,
Travis
On Monday, September 10, 2012 10:44:52 PM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi Travis,
I think you completely messed up the series file with your last
Hey
In the long run I definitely vote for option 1, with
sage.combinat.partitions.number_of_partitions pointing at any time to
whatever implementation is fastest. I am also all fine with option 1
in the short run if the user gets a useful error message when passing
extra options;
Hey Andrew,
Thanks for rebasing. I've fixed all of the doctests errors that I
introduced and it now all tests pass (on the modified files) at
partition_options-ts.patch, so what is the error that you get?
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:33:17 PM UTC-7, Andrew Mathas wrote:
Hey Andrew,
Both errors were caused by me and has been fixed.
Thanks,
Travis
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 6:26:53 AM UTC-7, Andrew Mathas wrote:
Hi Travis,
The errors that I got were:
sage -t devel/sage-combinat/sage/combinat/skew_partition.py
Thanks Nicolas!
Best,
Travis
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 1:43:53 PM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Dear Justin, Travis, Andrew,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 07:42:46AM -0700, Justin Kerney wrote:
I've been unable to get combinat to install. I installed
sage-5.3-OSX-64bit-
Hey Andrew,
I will just change it in my patch since mine is (will be) making a fair
amount of change to partition.py. Also, I'm operating under the assumption
that #13072 and #13074 will be merged long before mine is done. I also
believe all of your patches are ahead of
Should be fixed.
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:22:27 AM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi Travis,
The patch trac_13382.patch that you added to the queue does not apply to
sage-5.4.rc0 (at least).
Please fix that!!
Anne
skipping trac_13404-sf-nt.3.patch -
Hey everyone,
On Sunday, October 28, 2012 2:13:07 AM UTC-7, Andrew Mathas wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
Not OK (this could break e.g. Symmetric Functions):
sage: Partitions().options(cmp=dominance)
In his patch Travis has an option for changing the default comparison
method and I think
Hey Nicolas,
- IntegerListsLex no longer inherits from CombinatorialClass, but
instead
from Parent with elements of ClonableArray
Have you made some timings to measure the improvement?
No I haven't. I just remove the (deprecated-ish) CombinatorialClass and
made sure
Hey Nicolas,
On Monday, November 5, 2012 3:10:11 PM UTC-8, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Hi Travis!
Answering on sage-combinat-devel since trac access is to slow from
here.
- Forwarded message from Sage wst...@math.washington.edujavascript:
-
Right now the category
Hey Andrew,
If you have he stomach for it, I think that it would also be good to name
the class Partition_class as Partition -- and make the current Partition
function its __classcall_private__ method.
I don't think this is will really work because Partition_class is a
subclass of
Hey Nicolas,
- Would anyone object to making from_* private (i.e. _from_*) since they
are internal helper functions?
I do :-) Those are also meant to be called directly by the developer
when speed matters. Although arguably one would possibly want:
sage:
Hey everyone,
Just checking since I haven't followed seriously sage-combinat-devel
lately; for the semantic-changing options:
+1 on Partitions(order=...)
-1 on Partitions().options(order=...)
For doing the ordering option, how do we want to compare two elements
with different
Hey Hugh, Florent, and Andrew,
- I rebased the partition_leg_speedup-fh.patch since noone has seems to
have touched it in awhile and I making partitions.py Python 3 compliant.
- I disabled partitions_speedup_jb.patch since I wanted to ask if it is
okay that I remove this since I ended up
Hey Nicolas,
If it was just for me, I would forbid to compare with '' two objects
with different parents (possibly with some well chosen exceptions like
1/2 1).
In other words: if you get into a situation where you have a serious
doubt about the semantic (and thus probably even more so
Hey Nicolas,
This could be a good candidate for a lazy_import.
I'll give it a try.
Hey Hugh,
What Andrew said was correct, it's because we are removing
Partition_class. I will setup an alias with a deprecation warning.
Best,
Travis
--
You received this message because you are
Hey Hugh,
No problem. Sorry this has been such a hassle.
Also, I've rebased concrete_combinatorial_statistics_and_maps-cs.patch
(with Christian's approval), so the whole queue should (at present) apply
cleanly.
Best,
Travis
On Sunday, November 11, 2012 11:54:20 PM UTC-8, Hugh Thomas
Hey everyone,
I believe the repo is down again. Any estimated time on a revival?
Thanks,
Travis
On Monday, November 5, 2012 7:18:28 AM UTC-8, Christian Stump wrote:
Hi all,
any idea what the problem with the sage-combinat repository is, or
when it will be alive again?
Thanks,
amount of RAM in it, which I guess increases
the chances of failure...
-- William
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:55 AM, William Stein
wst...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Travis Scrimshaw
tsc...@ucdavis.edujavascript:
wrote:
Hey everyone,
I
Hey Hugh,
Travis: trac_12587-simplicial_complex_hash-ts.patch needs to be rebased
over 13590 (easy -- I could take care of it if you want).
I added #13590 to the queue and rebased #12587.
Thanks,
Travis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Thanks Andrew!
Travis
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 4:29:37 PM UTC-8, Andrew Mathas wrote:
On 14/11/12 6:24 AM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
Also in regard to the partition options patch, I can't seem to find the
Partitions_all_cache when the queue is applied up to there (I'm running
5.4
Hey,
Sorry to sound like a broken record, but I believe the sage-combinat
server is down again. What's the status on getting it back up?
Thanks,
Travis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To view this discussion on the web
...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
There may be a memory issue. I'm going to the server room to
physically reboot it again right now.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Travis Scrimshaw
tsc...@ucdavis.edujavascript:
wrote:
Hey,
Sorry to sound like a broken record, but I believe
Hey everyone,
Here's how you can get an infinite loop in two lines with Permutation.
sage: p =
Permutation([(1,10,11,13,9,3,16,0,22),(8,2,15,18,24,26,20,21,4),(5,6,17,12,25,7,23,14,19)])
sage: p.to_cycles()
Of course it has to be because my permutation goes from 0 to n-1
Hey Nathann,
The main reason why I stalled on the permutations input was mainly
trying to figure out how to handle generalized permutations (a.k.a.
bi-words, two-line arrays, in bijection with N-matrices) so the RS(K)
examples will still work (and as a 2fer, getting the full RSK working),
That was my fault due to changes in trac_13605-partition_options-ts.patch.
.
.
Andrew, I've rebased the patch by changing the compact option in _repr_()
to the method _repr_compact() (to fit into the display options framework
for partition/tableau objects).
The queue should now apply cleanly.
Hey everyone,
I just had an idea, and maybe this is more wishful thinking, but I feel
like we should be able to pass a poset/lambda function(s)/class which
contains comparison methods into a parent and have that be able to override
the default ordering (similar to what C++ does in the STL).
Hey Christian,
I've upgraded, so feel free to push your changes and I'll rebase #13605
as needed.
Best,
Travis
On Friday, November 23, 2012 6:44:17 AM UTC-8, Christian Stump wrote:
Ok, I'll work now on rebasing my patch for 5.5.rc0. Sorry it's taking
so long.
It's not that I need
Martin,
You mentioned that you had code for variants of RSK, could you
repost/reference that?
Thanks,
Travis
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 2:58:21 PM UTC-8, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
Hey everyone,
I've been trying to figure out how to handle generalized
permutations (a.k.a. two-line
Hey,
In a few places, I think we already are assuming generators are for
finite lists. However I also think its better to use IterableFunctionCall
since if we do something like:
{{{
sage: L = CarteseanProduct(Partitions()) # Maybe for a better example
Partitions_all.__iter__()
sage: for x in
Hey everyone,
Here's the current update of the options patch #13605:
- I've added containment as an additional order option which are set in
the parent objects
- I've had to leave `Partitions_all` alone for the most part, deprecating
it caused pickling/TestSuite errors I couldn't figure out
is not facades,
but instead the equality comparison method is not robust enough.
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, November 29, 2012 2:36:05 PM UTC-8, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 06:53:56PM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
Hey everyone,
I just had an idea, and maybe this is more
Hey Anne, Darij,
I missed one of the *length_tableau() functions when I was removing it.
It should work now.
Best,
Travis
On Friday, November 30, 2012 12:10:15 AM UTC-8, Andrew Mathas wrote:
Hi Anne,
The problem appears after trac_13605-partition_options-ts.patch is applied.
Andrew
Hey everyone,
#13605 has now been rebased and the queue applies cleanly for me.
Best,
Travis
On Friday, November 30, 2012 4:56:20 PM UTC-8, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi Sage-combinat Folks,
I have just added Chris Berg's patch 13762 to the sage-combinat queue.
Unfortunately, it has a
And now sage actually starts and creates the partitions and k-bounded
partitions.
Best,
Travis
On Friday, November 30, 2012 5:22:26 PM UTC-8, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
Hey everyone,
#13605 has now been rebased and the queue applies cleanly for me.
Best,
Travis
On Friday, November 30
Hey Andrew,
It sounds more like you want to use a spare matrix (or even just a
dictionary with a tuple as the key) and fill in entries as you compute them.
Best,
Travis
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 3:29:27 AM UTC-8, Andrew Mathas wrote:
huh?
sage: m=matrix([[1,2],[3,4]])
sage: m
Hey everyone,
What is the reason why facade=True is allowable by Parent? It seems like
we always want to pass in the parent(s) which our facade parent is acting
for.
Best,
Travis
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:23:01 AM UTC-8, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
Dear facade lovers,
I just
/6 Travis Scrimshaw tsc...@ucdavis.edu javascript::
What is the reason why facade=True is allowable by Parent? It seems
like
we always want to pass in the parent(s) which our facade parent is
acting
for.
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:23:01 AM UTC-8, Vincent Delecroix
wrote
is mainly about
the naming convention.
Best,
Vincent
2012/12/6 Travis Scrimshaw tsc...@ucdavis.edu javascript::
Hey Vincent,
I found this ticket #5039 in which it mentions in the combinat queue
(although it seems like it got integrated into sage at some point...),
they
created
Perhaps it would be better it would be better to set _facade_for = facade
in parent.pyx by un-indenting the line one step in Parent.__init__() rather
than doing a getattr().
That was suppose to be (its been a long day, please forgive me):
Perhaps it would be better to set _facade_for =
Hey Andrew,
The easy one first: should the reverse ordering also exist? That is,
reverse lex, reverse dominance, reverse containment? If people agree
that it is worth including these explicitly it would be good if there was a
systematic way to organise all of the orderings...will let
Ah I see. I will implement a (naive) __reversed__() method for the
partitions (see http://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#reversed)
since we've removed __len__() from the partition parents. That way you can
just call `reversed(Partitions(5))` to iterate through in reverse. Expect
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:32:49 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I should mention that this kind of error was reported on
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13143
but nobody was able to say exactly where the problem lies.
Now we know, it's Firefox-specific.
I can also add
Hey Alexm
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 09:04:40AM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
Thanks for the hints. I hadn't noticed the magic incantation with
max_slope and length; that's the kind of thing I was looking for.
There seems to be quite a bit of overhead involved. Here are some
timings,
, Travis Scrimshaw a écrit :
Hey Jean-Baptiste Priez,
I disabled your recently added patch
trac_13793-some-hopf-algebra-f-w-pqsym-EliX-jbp.patch since it did not
apply in the queue for me (the failure was in setup.py and I'm running
5.5.rc0).
Thanks,
Travis
--
You received this message
Hey Nicolas,
Thanks for investigating this! If you feel like it, I am all in favor
of a small patch taking care of the most urgent optimizations before
we go for the full cythonization. I am not surprised by the results of
your timings. In MuPAD we had done a similar optimization by using
Hey Hugh,
Below are the results of my attempt to apply the queue on 5.6.beta2.
Thanks Hugh.
Nicolas: trac_10193-graded_enumerated_sets-nt.patch needs to be rebased
over #13742 (Nathann's ticket about the permutations code), which needs to
be added into the queue.
Also,
Nicolas: trac_10193-graded_enumerated_sets-nt.patch needs to be rebased
over #13742 (Nathann's ticket about the permutations code), which needs to
be added into the queue.
Also, category-symmetric_groups-nt.patch needs a trivial rebase over
#13366
Nicolas, I've added the #13742
Hey Christian,
@Travis: did you introduce #+5_6_beta1, 10193_rebase ? This way, one
cannot install the combinat queue anymore since sage -combinat
qselect doesn't understand this guard...
Yes I did. I thought that was how to get 2 guards on a patch. Sorry about
that.
Best,
Travis
--
Hey Jean-Yves,
If you want to write a small patch to fix this to get something merged
into sage, please let me know because I might need to rebase
trac_8392-check_permutation-ts.patch (I can also review it). Otherwise I
can work the fix in my aforementioned patch because I'm reworking the
Hey everyone,
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:42:55 AM UTC-8, Jean-Yves Thibon wrote:
Yes ! As you probably already guessed, everything is not yet in a clean
state... The first call should raise the same error than the second one.
I understand, but in this case, one should teach
Hey Anne,
Thanks for your work on this!
XD I say Andrew is doing the hard work on this.
I am reviewing Travis' patch #13605 which is great as it implements some
needed improvements. I have a few minor issues which I think shouldn't be
decided between just the two of us -- apologies
Hey Hugh,
Thanks for checking this. (And yay!)
Best,
Travis
On Friday, February 1, 2013 8:01:22 AM UTC-5, Hugh Thomas wrote:
Hi everyone!
The queue applies on 5.7.beta2, and sage starts.
cheers,
Hugh
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 7:26:48 PM UTC-4, Hugh Thomas wrote:
Hi everyone!
Hey Anne and Nicolas,
I caused this when I rebased #10963. I've fixed it and pushed the changes.
Sorry!
Travis
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 9:54:59 AM UTC-5, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi!
Applying all patches in the sage-combinat queue needing review (and no
further)
currently breaks
Hey everyone,
Mike Z. first noticed that the docbuild crashes when the full combinat
queue is applied, and the patch which this starts to occur is Mike H.'s
attrcall-mh.patch.
travis@travis-virtualbox:~/sage-5.7.beta3/devel/sage-combinat/sage/combinat$
sage -docbuild reference html
Hey everyone,
I have (a few) patches which modifies the documentation, so I need to
add ticket #6495 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6495 to the
combinat queue. This will likely break a fair number of patches and you
*will* need to download the spkg at
Here's the list of patches I disabled:
- trac_10193-graded_enumerated_sets-vd_no_more_nt.patch
- trac_10193-review-nb.patch
- trac_10193-more-vd.patch
- trac_12940_affine_permutations-td.patch
- trac_8703-trees-fh.patch
- trac_13987_mary_trees-vp.patch
- trees_symmetry_factor-fh.patch
-
-5, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 05:20:20AM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
I have (a few) patches which modifies the documentation, so I need
to
add ticket #6495 to the combinat queue. This will likely break a fair
number of patches and you *will* need
Hey Andrew,
There could likely be other dependencies that don't show up on trac
because they were already merged into sage before the ticket came up for
review. What I found was look for files which you get rejects on and see if
there are any patches which modify said files between your
Just as a gotcha!, make its recommended on the ticket that you delete
the old output directory before you rebuild the new documentation because
the old files still hang around.
Best,
Travis
On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:13:37 AM UTC-5, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
Here's the list of patches
Hey Franco,
These all percolate from #6495 not applying. Andrew also came across
this problem (I think he upgraded) Tomorrow I will dig through and see if I
can find out what patch(es) are missing.
Best,
Travis
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:50:45 PM UTC-5, Franco Saliola wrote:
Hey Franco (and Andrew),
Could you post the reject file that you're getting so I'll know where to
look?
Thank you,
Travis
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:35:39 PM UTC-5, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
Hey Franco,
These all percolate from #6495 not applying. Andrew also came across
Hey Franco,
I noticed that this morning and fixed it (about an hour ago and it was
an error on every version caused by me).
Best,
Travis
On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:55:03 AM UTC-5, Franco Saliola wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
I'll check as soon as I get in that trac_13872-RC_bijections-ts.patch still
applies and reupload #13605 to trac. However on 5.8.beta1, I get this
reject:
patching file doc/en/thematic_tutorials/index.rst
Hunk #1 FAILED at 4
1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
Hey everyone,
You know when you get warnings like:
[combinat ]
/home/travis/sage-5.8.beta1/devel/sage/doc/en/reference/combinat/words.rst:4:
WARNING: toctree contains reference to nonexisting document
'sage/combinat/words/abstract_word'
and typically one has to delete the entire doc output
Hey Vincent and Nicolas,
It should be fixed now. I rebased it over #14054.
Best,
Travis
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:17:55 AM UTC-5, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
Hi,
Just to let you know, sage -combinat install still failed to apply on
sage-5.7
{{{
applying
Right now, the _repr_ method for posets returns a very generic statement:
sage: Posets(4)[0]
Finite poset containing 4 elements
This makes two posets with the same number of elements indistinguishable
from their _repr_. I would like to change this. Possible suggestion:
Poset on n
Hey Simon,
Because the ABC Partitions has a __classcall_private__() which returns
the correct parent and is acting as a factory. This is applied to all of
its subclasses which doesn't make sense there and caused exceptions to be
raised (at least, that's what I remember, it's been awhile
Hey Simon,
No, certainly not. From the docs of sage.misc.classcall_metaclass:
Another difference is that ``__classcall__`` is inherited by
subclasses, which may be desirable, or not. If not, one should
instead define the method ``__classcall_private__`` which will
Hey,
Thanks Kannappan for your work on this! By the way: would you mind
using the occasion to move this method to the CoxeterGroups category?
Of course, calling W.longest_element() for an infinite coxeter group
W is not a wise thing to do; but we recently had the need for
computing
That might be my patch on speeding up k_dual since I made some minor tweaks
the partitions.py...I'll look into it today.
Best,
Travis
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 11:11:19 PM UTC-5, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi!
I noticed today that some patch between the beginning and trac_14102 in
the
PS - The patch I'm referring to is trac_14228-sym_speedup-ts.patch.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hey Anne,
I was the culprit, but it was in
trac_12453-refactor_integer_vectors-ts.patch. I've disabled this patch for
now, so kschurs should now be working.
Sorry for the trouble,
Travis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel
1 - 100 of 1182 matches
Mail list logo
