Here is another bug apparently related to the preparser and "\":
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/37467
Regards,
Max
On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 1:01:54 AM UTC-4 John H Palmieri wrote:
> By the way, see https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36194 for a bug
> related to the
By the way, see https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36194 for a bug
related to the preparser and "\".
On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 9:59:47 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote:
> The votes are overwhelmingly in favor of deprecating. I have opened
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36394
The votes are overwhelmingly in favor of deprecating. I have opened
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36394 for this.
On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 3:42:38 AM UTC-7 kcrisman wrote:
> Though I am sympathetic to the pro-deprecation arguments and recognize
> they will win, I vote do not
Though I am sympathetic to the pro-deprecation arguments and recognize they
will win, I vote do not deprecate, as mission includes Matlab, and for
backwards compatibility. As an example, the first edition of the
AMS-published "Sage for Undergraduates" used the backslash operator in a
number
Deprecate the pre-parsing of \
the backslash operator please.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view
+1 for deprecation
Eric;
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
